PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 Review

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 Review - Lenses
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 brings the convenience of a zoom lens to medium format photography, but it's not as sharp as other lenses for the Pentax 645 system.
Best Deal£419

Buy It Now

£419

Pros & Cons

    • Light and compact.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Even illumination.
    • Focus clutch system.
    • Not as sharp as other medium format lenses.
    • Narrow maximum aperture.
    • Aperture dims viewfinder.
    • Design isn't weather resistant.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 87 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 43.5
Dimensions 4.1 by 3.5 inches
Lens Mount Pentax 645AF2
Optical Zoom 2 x
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 1.1

The Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 ($1,699.95) is a zoom lens for the company's 645D ($2,175.00 at Amazon) and 645Z medium format cameras. Its zoom ratio is a modest 2x, but it captures a slight wide angle to medium telephoto field of view, and considering that it covers a medium format image sensor, it's surprisingly light and compact. There are some compromises—the lens isn't sealed against dust and moisture like the digital 645 bodies are, it's not as crisp as pricier prime lenses, and it doesn't capture as much light as a prime. But given its price, and the versatility that a zooming design delivers, it's a solid choice for Pentax medium format owners.

Design
The 55-110mm ($698.00 at Amazon) is a sturdy lens, with a metal barrel, manual aperture ring, and rubberized zoom and focus control rings—but it doesn't have the o-ring seal at its base that completes the weather-resistant design of Pentax 645D and 645Z ($5,023.51 at Amazon) cameras. It measures 4.1 by 3.5 inches (HD) at its shortest, weighs 1.1 pounds, and supports 82mm front filters. It's at its most compact at about 75mm, as the barrel extends slightly when zooming to 55mm or to 110mm. A reversible lens hood, with a removable cutout window so you can adjust a circular polarizer with the hood mounted, is included.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 : Sample Image

When used on a digital body it's best to keep the aperture ring set to its A position, as that allows the f-stop to be adjusted via the camera body. If you're still shooting film, manual aperture control (from f/8 through f/32 in half-stop increments, along with full-stop jumps to f/45 and f/5.6) is available via the ring. Digital bodies are able to adjust the aperture with third-stop precision through its entire range. The zoom range is rather modest—2x—matching the field of view of a 43.5-87mm field of view mounted to a full-frame 35mm camera.

The lens can focus as close as 2.6 feet (0.8 meter). That doesn't give it a huge magnification capability—it captures objects at about 1:6.25 life size at 110mm—but is a solid working range for portraiture and casual photography. It's easy to switch between manual and autofocus—the focus ring is a clutch that is pushed forward to engage the autofocus system and pulled back to switch to manual focus control. There's no internal focus motor; instead the lens is driven by the body's autofocus screw drive.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 : Sample Image

Because the maximum aperture is a mere f/5.6, you'll notice that the viewfinder is dimmer than when shooting with an f/2.8 lens like the SMC D FA 645 55mm F2.8 AL (IF) SDM AW ($769.95 at Amazon) . It's not a huge deal in sunlight, but could be a concern for photographers working indoors, either in an event space or in a studio without modeling lights.

Image Quality
I tested the 55-110mm with the 50MP 645Z. At 55mm f/5.6 it scores 3,170 lines on Imatest's center-weighted sharpness test. That's better than the 2,200 lines we hope to see in a high-resolution camera like the 645Z, but it lags behind other medium format lenses at the same f-stop. The HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 ($1,599.95 at Amazon) hits 4,308 lines at f/5.6.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 : Sample Image

Edge performance at 55mm is a bit weak as well, with the periphery of the frame coming up soft at 1,769 lines. Stopping down to f/8 improves things all around, bumping the overall score to 3,683 lines with crisper edges (2,361 liens). At f/11 the lens scores 3,689 lines, and the edges put up an excellent 3,124 lines. Peak resolution is at f/16 (3,902 lines), with edges that barely lag behind the center of the frame in crispness. Diffraction reduces sharpness at narrower settings—3,501 lines at f/22, 2,766 lines at f/32, and 1,848 lines at f/45.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

At 80mm the edges of the frame are much sharper, keeping up with the center even at f/5.6, where the average score is 3,447 lines. At f/8 it improves to 3,828 lines, and peaks at f/11 (4,034 lines). Numbers remain solid at f/16 (3,982 lines), but dip at narrower apertures—3,578 lines at f/22, 2,880 lines at f/32, and 1,891 lines at f/45.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 : Sample Image

Sharpness drops off at 110mm. At f/5.6 the lens shows just 2,626 lines, although with even performance across the frame. Stopping down to f/8 gives it a boost to 3,291 lines, and it improves again at f/11 (3,694 lines). Peak performance is at f/16 (3,743 lines), before giving way to diffraction at f/22 (3,442 lines), f/32 (2,883 lines), and f/45 (2,076 lines).

There's a little bit of barrel distortion at 55mm, just about 1.3 percent. That adds a slight outward curve to straight lines, but is something that can easily be removed using processing software like Adobe Lightroom ($9.99/Month at Adobe) . At 80mm and 110mm distortion is a nonissue.

I also used Imatest to evaluate how even light falls on the image sensor using an ExpoDisc to shoot a flat gray frame and the Uniformity tool to analyze it. At f/5.6 the corners lag behind the center by a little less than 1 f-stop (1EV), which is just within the tolerance of what we like to see. At narrower apertures corner illumination is within a third of a stop of the center, which isn't something you're going to notice in the field. The 55-110mm benefits from its design here; it covers a full 645 format film frame, and the sensor that Pentax uses in its digital medium format line is slightly smaller.

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 : Sample Image(Photo Credit: Elisa D. Keller)

Conclusions
The Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 is a solid workhorse lens for medium format photographers who have invested in the Pentax 645 system. It's not a standout performer like the company's excellent HD D FA 645 Macro 90mm F2.8 ED AW SR ($500.00 at Amazon) , but its price tag is more down to earth. It captures images that pass muster on our sharpness test, don't show a lot of distortion, and are evenly illuminated. It's a relatively inexpensive zoom lens, so don't expect it to keep up with a prime like the excellent 35mm F3.5, which can take full advantage of the 645Z's 50MP image sensor. The narrow maximum aperture is an issue, presenting a dimmer image in the viewfinder than a prime lens or a pricier zoom like the SMC FA 645 45-85mm f/4.5 ($2,399.95), but as long as you're working under the sun or in a studio with modeling lights, you'll be able to see your subject without issue. Overall, the 55-110mm is a solid choice if you want the convenience of a zoom lens, but don't want to break the bank.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 Review - Lenses

Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 Review

3.5 Good

The Pentax SMC FA 645 55-110mm f/5.6 brings the convenience of a zoom lens to medium format photography, but it's not as sharp as other lenses for the Pentax 645 system.

Get It Now
Best Deal£419

Buy It Now

£419

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio