PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 Review

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 Review - Lenses
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 is a sharp wide-angle lens for the 645 medium format system, but it does show a little barrel distortion.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Crisp optics from edge to edge.
    • Light and compact.
    • Focus clutch system.
    • Some barrel distortion.
    • Dim corners at wide apertures.
    • Lacks weather sealing.

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 27
Dimensions 3.5 by 3.5 inches
Lens Mount Pentax 645AF2
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 1.3

The Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 ($1,599) covers a wide-angle field of view when paired with a Pentax 645Z ($5,023.51 at Amazon) or 645D ($2,175.00 at Amazon) medium format camera. Considering that it's designed to cover an image sensor larger than you'll find in full-frame SLRs, it's surprisingly light and compact. Although it shows some barrel distortion, the lens is very sharp. It's a solid option for Pentax medium format photographers.

Design
The HD D FA 645 35mm ($1,599.95 at Amazon)  measures 3.5 by 3.5 inches (HD), weighs 1.3 pounds, and supports 82mm front filters. It wouldn't be considered overly large when paired with a full-frame SLR, and is downright svelte in the world of medium format, especially when you consider its wide-angle coverage. The lens captures a field of view that's roughly equivalent to a 28mm prime on a full-frame 35mm camera.

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 : Sample Image

The lens barrel is metal and free of toggle switches. It does have a physical aperture ring (you'll want to set it to the A position to use it with a digital camera) and a manual focus ring. The focus ring is wrapped in knurled rubber and doubles as a clutch; pulling it back toward you changes operation to manual focus, and pushing it forward activates autofocus. The lens doesn't incorporate an internal focus motor in its design; instead it's driven by your camera's screw drive, part of the lens mount. The focus speed is quick, but is on the noisy side.

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 : Sample Image

The 35mm is by no means a macro lens, but it can focus pretty close. At its closest focus distance, 11.8 inches, it projects objects at one-quarter life size onto the image sensor. The close focus capability is a plus for capturing subjects nearby, while showing some of the surrounding environment at the same time.

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 : Sample Image

The lens does omit weather sealing, which is included in both of Pentax's 645 digital cameras. You'll want to take care to cover the lens and mount when working in rain or snow. If you want a weather-sealed lens that covers this angle of view for the 645, Pentax does have the HD DA 645 28-45mm f/4.5 ED AW SR zoom. It's larger, heavier, and a lot more expensive—$4,999.95—but does offer image stabilization as well, another feature the HD D FA 645 35mm doesn't include. Image stabilization isn't nearly as common in the medium format world as it is in 35mm and APS-C cameras.

Image Quality
I used Imatest to analyze the image quality that the HD D FA 645 35mm is able to muster when paired with the 50-megapixel 645Z. At f/3.5 the lens shows excellent sharpness, well in excess of the 2,200 lines we aim to see from a high-resolution camera. It scores 3,778 lines on a center-weighted test, with image quality that is dead even from center to edge.

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 : Sample Image

Stopping down to f/4 delivers a significant jump in resolution, 4,046 lines, and at f/5.6 the lens shows 4,308 lines. Its peak resolution is at f/8 (4,376 lines), but it's still a solid performer at f/11 (4,168 lines). Diffraction takes a more noticeable toll at f/16, reducing the resolution to 3,757 lines, so you should avoid stopping down that far unless it's absolutely required to get ample depth of field for a shot. You can also shoot at f/22 (3,091 lines) and f/32 (2,178 lines), but image quality isn't as good at those narrow settings as it is at wider apertures.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

There's a bit of barrel distortion, about 2.3 percent. This gives straight lines the appearance of an outward curve in photographs. It's noticeable in field conditions, especially when photographing architecture, but is corrected with ease when editing photos in software like Lightroom ($9.99/Month at Adobe) .

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 : Sample Image

Corners are a little dim when the lens is shot at wide apertures. I used an ExpoDisc to shoot flat gray images, and analyzed them using Imatest's Uniformity tool. At f/3.5 the corners are noticeably dim, about 2.2 stops (2.2EV) darker than the center of the image, and sides lag behind the center by about 1.3EV. Stopping down to f/4 brightens the corners to -1.7EV and the sides to -0.9EV. At f/5.6 and beyond the corners are within 1EV of the center, barely noticeable in the field, and the sides are within a half-stop, completely negligible. Periphery illumination, like distortion, can be corrected with ease in Lightroom.

Conclusions
The Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 is a strong performer, capturing images that are evenly sharp from edge to edge, an important consideration for landscape photographers who want detail at the edge of the frame to be just as crisp as it is at the center. It's also quite compact for a medium format lens, especially when you consider its wide field of view. It's not without its drawbacks—there's some barrel distortion, and corners are dim when shooting at wider apertures. It's also pricey when compared with similar lenses for full-frame systems, though not at all out of line with medium format lenses of this type—similar lenses from Hasselblad, Phase One, and Leica range in price from $3,000 to $7,000. Pentax 645D and 645Z owners in want of a wide-angle prime should take a close look at the HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 Review - Lenses

Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 Review

4.0 Excellent

The Pentax HD D FA 645 35mm F3.5 is a sharp wide-angle lens for the 645 medium format system, but it does show a little barrel distortion.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio