PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R Review

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R Review - Lenses
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R is a fast, compact standard-angle lens for Fuji mirrorless cameras, but focus is a little slow and edges are on the soft side.
Best Deal£549

Buy It Now

£549

Pros & Cons

    • Sharp center.
    • Uniform illumination.
    • Wide aperture.
    • Nominal distortion.
    • Physical aperture ring.
    • Soft edges.
    • A bit slow to focus.
    • Electronic manual focus.
    • Omits optical stabilization.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 52
Dimensions 2.2 by 2.6 inches
Lens Mount Fujifilm X
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 6.6

Fujifilm's X camera system launched in early 2012, and the Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R ($599) was one of the first three lenses available for photographers who were captivated by the appealing X-Pro1 ($399.00 at Amazon) . It covers a standard-angle field of view, and when shot at a wide aperture allows you to capture images with a shallow depth of field, which makes it an ideal first lens for the system. It's a good performer, although it doesn't focus as quickly as more recent Fuji lenses and sharpness drops off as you near the edges of the frame. Our Editors' Choice is a newer offering, the Fujinon XF 35mm F2 R WR ($399.00 at Amazon) —it's a stop slower, but is quicker to focus, smaller, sharper, weather-resistant, and less expensive.

Design
The XF 35mm F1.4 ($599.00 at Amazon)  measures 2.2 by 2.6 inches (HD), weighs 6.6 ounces, and supports 52mm front filters. It's no by means a large lens—it balances quite well even on a smaller body like the Fujifilm X-T10 ($269.99 at Amazon) . But it is larger than the XF 35mm F2 (1.8 by 2.4 inches, 6 ounces) and lacks its weather-resistant design.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R : Sample Image

A lens hood is included. It's metal, and attaches with bayonet action. It's not reversible; if you leave it attached, the height of the lens will extend by about an inch, taking up a bit more room in your bag. If you frequently use a neutral density or polarizing filter, be aware that you'll want to remove the hood to install or remove the filter, but the bayonet design makes that an easier proposition than the screw-in filter that ships with the XF 35mm F2.

There's a physical ring on the lens to adjust aperture, from f/1.4 through f/16 with third-stop precision and a knurled metal finish. You can also set it to the A position for automatic aperture control. The manual focus ring sits ahead of the aperture ring, also finished in knurled metal with ridges that are closer together than those of the aperture ring.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R : Sample Image

Manual focus is performed electronically—turning the ring activates the focus motor to move lens elements rather than turning them physically, as you get with a lens with mechanical manual focus control. It's not a manual focus experience I particularly enjoy, but is par for the course with most mirrorless cameras. When paired with the X-T10, autofocus speed is little slow—it requires about 0.2-second to lock focus and fire, compared with 0.1-second when paired with the Fujinon XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS ($659.00 at Amazon) .

The 35mm focuses as close as 11 inches, which is pretty typical for a lens of this type. It's by no means a macro—at the closest focus distance it projects images on to the image sensor at 1:5.9 life-size. But it does provide a good working distance for everyday photography. If you want a macro for your X camera, consider the Zeiss Touit 2.8/50M ($700.00 at Amazon) or the Fujinon XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro ($649.00 at Amazon) .

Image Quality
I used Imatest to see how the 35mm performs when paired with the 16-megapixel X-T10. At f/1.4 it captures images that are sharp throughout most of the frame, but noticeably blurry at the outer third. This translates into a center-weighted resolution of 2,305 lines per picture height, which is in excess of the 1,800 lines we want to see in an image. But the outer third of the frame, 1,167 lines, is the problem area.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R : Sample Image

Image quality holds steady at f/2, but there is an improvement at f/2.8—the average score improves to 2,525 lines and the edges are a more respectable 1,500 lines. At f/4 the center-weighted score holds steady, but we finally see crisp results to the edge of the frame, with the periphery notching 1,760 lines.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

Peak performance is at f/5.6. The overall score is an excellent 2,669 lines, and the edges don't lag that far behind at 2,212 lines. Resolution starts to drop at f/8, but the lens still nets 2,580 lines there and 2,671 lines at f/11. Diffraction is more of an issue at f/16, but the lens still manages 2,357 lines at its smallest f-stop. The XF 35mm F2 is a stronger performer—it scores 2,757 lines at f/2, better than the XF 35mm F1.4 can do when stopped down.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R : Sample Image

Distortion is a nonissue—that's a big plus for a fast standard-angle lens, a design that often shows some barrel curvature. Illumination is also quite even. At f/1.4 the corners are just a little dim, -1EV when compared with the center of the frame. At narrower apertures the difference is less than a stop at the corners and less than a half-stop at the edges.

Conclusions
An f/1.4 lens is always appealing for photographers who like to capture images in dim light or with a very shallow depth of field. The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R hits those notes, and it delivers images that are crisp through most of the frame, free of distortion, and evenly illuminated. Yes, there's some muddiness at the edges at wide apertures, but a shallow depth of field will do a good job hiding those, as long as you aren't framing your subject at the periphery of the frame. But photographers using the Fujifilm mirrorless system have another option that delivers crisper images from edge to edge. Our Editors' Choice, the Fujinon XF 35mm F2 R WR, only captures half the light at its widest f-stop, but images show more detail. It's also smaller, weather-sealed, and less expensive. If you really crave the look of an f/1.4 lens, the XF 35mm F1.4 R is a solid choice, but its smaller f/2 sibling offers better performance and value.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R Review - Lenses

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R Review

3.5 Good

The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm F1.4 R is a fast, compact standard-angle lens for Fuji mirrorless cameras, but focus is a little slow and edges are on the soft side.

Get It Now
Best Deal£549

Buy It Now

£549

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio