PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Zeiss Loxia 2/35

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Zeiss Loxia 2/35 - Digital Cameras
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Zeiss Loxia 2/35 is a solid choice for manual focus aficionados. It's sharp, well-built, and a pleasure to use.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Strong center sharpness.
    • Excellent manual focus experience.
    • No distortion.
    • Physical aperture ring.
    • Superb build.
    • Dust and splash resistant.
    • Lacks image stabilization.
    • Some edge softness at wide apertures.

Zeiss Loxia 2/35 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 35
Dimensions 2.4 by 2.3 inches
Lens Mount Sony E
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 12

Zeiss and Sony have a close relationship, with many Sony-made lenses bearing the Zeiss badge. But that hasn't stopped the company from making its own lenses for Sony camera systems, notably the autofocus Touit line for APS-C mirrorless models. The Loxia series, which covers the full-frame format and is compatible with Sony Alpha 7 series cameras, is purely manual focus. The Loxia 2/35 ($1,299) is one of two lenses that are launching the series, and it's a good one, especially if you value its f/2 maximum aperture and smooth manual focus operation. But we give preference to the Sony Zeiss Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA ($798.00 at Amazon) , an autofocus lens that's impeccably sharper and less expensive, as our Editors' Choice—but its focus-by-wire manual focus system doesn't offer the same tactile feel as the Loxia.

Zeiss has placed an emphasis on size with the Loxia series. The 35mm lens ($1,299.00 at Amazon)  measures 2.3 by 2.4 (HD) inches, weighs 12 ounces, and supports 52mm front filters. If you plan on buying other lenses in the Loxia series—right now the Loxia 2/50 ($949.00 at Amazon) is the only other that's been announced—you'll be able to share filters among them, as Zeiss plans on keeping the filter size at 52mm throughout the line. Even though it's a manual focus lens, it does communicate with the camera, so EXIF data is saved in images.

Zeiss Loxia 2/35 : Sample Image

The lens barrel is metal, and there is a seal at the lens mount that preserves the weather-sealed design of the Sony cameras with which it is compatible. The manual focus ring has a long focus throw for precise adjustments; it turns 180° to move from the 0.3-meter close focus distance to infinity. The focus action is neither too loose nor too tight; there's just the right amount of resistance, and the action is consistent throughout the focus range.

The aperture can be set from f/2 through f/22 in third-stop increments. A printed depth-of-field scale has markings for f/4, f/8, f/16, and f/22, and the focus throw is precise to the point where zone focus is practical. Zeiss includes a tool with the lens to turn a screw on the mount that disable the detents, cementing the Loxia's place as a video lens. It does omit image stabilization, which is beneficial for handheld video, but for that type of work it can be paired with the Alpha 7 II ($898.00 at Amazon) , which includes in-body stabilization.

Zeiss Loxia 2/35 : Sample Image

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of images captured by the Loxia when paired with the 24-megapixel Alpha 7 . At f/2 it scores 2,157 lines per picture height on a center-weighted sharpness test. That's better than the 1,800 lines we look for in a photo, and that quality is maintained through most of the frame; but the outer edges are a bit soft, showing just 1,340 lines. Stopping down to f/2.8 improves the center-weighted score to 2,457 lines, and edges sharpen to 1,697 lines, which is fine for the periphery of the frame.

At f/4 things are even better. The center-weighted score is 2,839 lines, and edges are crisp at 2,100 lines. The lens improves at f/5.6 (2,921 lines) and peaks at f/8 (2,948 lines), with even sharpness from edge to edge at both apertures. It loses a bit of detail due to diffraction at f/11 (2,850 lines), but even at f/16 (2,733 liens) and f/22 (2,275 lines) it produces sharp results. Distortion is a complete nonissue.

Zeiss Loxia 2/35 : Sample Image

The Zeiss Loxia 2/35 is a gem of a lens, but it's only for shooters who value manual focus. The Loxia does capture twice as much light as our favorite 35mm lens for the Sony full-fame mirrorless system, our Editors' Choice Zeiss Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA, but it's also more expensive than the autofocusing Sonnar. If you prefer the feel of a manual focus lens, or are primarily a videographer looking for a top-notch lens with a clickless aperture and a manual focus ring that's suitable for use with a focus pulling rig, the Loxia won't disappoint in terms of build quality or optics.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Zeiss Loxia 2/35 - Digital Cameras

Zeiss Loxia 2/35 Review

4.0 Excellent

The Zeiss Loxia 2/35 is a solid choice for manual focus aficionados. It's sharp, well-built, and a pleasure to use.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio