PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art - Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

You might not like the bulk, but you won't find many faults with the optics inside Sigma's 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art lens.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Outstanding optics.
    • Bright f/1.2 design.
    • Full-frame coverage.
    • Available for Sony and L-mount systems.
    • Declickable aperture ring.
    • Dust, splash, and fluorine protection.
    • Big and heavy.
    • Audible focus motor.

The Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art ($1,499) is another big, heavy lens, a continuing design trend in the industry. It backs up its heft with impeccable optics, excellent build quality, and a relatively attractive asking price. If you're willing to deal with its size, it will deliver impeccable shots with an extremely shallow depth of field. But you shouldn't discount good f/1.8 or f/2.8 alternatives, like Sigma's own 45mm F2.8 DG DN Contemporary, which delivers strong optical performance in its own right, in a much smaller, more affordable package.

Heavy Optics Required for F1.2 Aperture

The Sigma 35mm F1.2 comes in at 5.4 by 3.5 inches (HD) and 2.4 pounds. It's massive for a prime, especially when you consider that you'll be pairing it with a mirrorless camera rather than an SLR. Its front element is big too, requiring 82mm filters. A hood, caps, and carrying case are included.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

The large size is necessitated by the aperture. At f/1.2 it captures about 50 percent more light than an f/1.4 lens. In order to do so, and deliver images that are sharp from edge to edge, larger, heavier glass elements are a necessity. For comparison, Sony's FE 35mm F1.4 ZA is about a pound lighter and an inch shorter.

It's an example of a recent trend. Sigma also makes a big 40mm F1.4 for SLRs, and we've seen first-party mirrorless options swell in size too. Canon's RF 50mm F1.2 L is another example. Sigma doesn't sell the lens for Canon cameras, however. You can get it for Sony E-mount bodies, as well as L-mount cameras made by Leica, Panasonic, and Sigma.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

There are alternatives available. Sony offers the small FE 35mm F1.8 for E-mount, and L-mount owners can look to the svelte Sigma 45mm F2.8. Of course, you'll sacrifice light gathering to get there—the f/1.8 lens is nearly a full stop slower than the f/1.2, and the f/2.8 option is two stops behind.

Built Tough

The 35mm F1.2 is housed in a sturdy housing, a mix of metal and polycarbonate materials. It's protected against dust and splashes, like many of the cameras with which it will be paired, and also incorporates fluorine protection on the front element. It prevents smudges or water droplets from adhering to the surface, especially helpful given its large size.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

Controls include a manual focus ring, finished in textured rubber, and an aperture control ring with a knurled metal finish. The aperture ring can be set from f/1.2 through f/16 in third-stop increments and also has an A position to move aperture control to the camera body. The ring can also be set to turn smoothly, without detent clicks, a plus for video work where smooth iris adjustment is desired.

It's easy enough to switch between the two options—a switch on the barrel toggles aperture clicks. Other on-lens controls include an AF-L button and the standard MF/AF focus toggle. Some cameras will allow you to adjust the AF-L button's function—on our a7R IV test body, I was able to set it to perform dozens of sundry functions.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

Autofocus is quick, but not entirely silent. I noticed a slight clicking noise when using the lens in AF-C. It's not overly loud—you won't hear it over background noise—but it can appear on video soundtracks if you're using your camera's internal microphone. There have been some reports of focus inaccuracy when pairing the L-mount version of the lens with Panasonic cameras, but I wasn't able to try the combination myself. In my short time with the L version of the lens and a pre-production Leica SL2 I enjoyed accurate autofocus.

Focus is available to 11.8 inches, measured from the sensor. This gives the lens a good close-up working distance, so you'll rarely have to back away from a subject to get a shot. It's good enough to net 1:5.1 life-size reproduction at the closest focus distance.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

There's no optical stabilization, which isn't surprising. The feature isn't commonly found in bright prime lenses. But, with more and more cameras offering in-body image stabilization (IBIS), and the bright aperture making shorter shutter speeds possible in many situations, it's not a big concern.

Incredible Resolution

I paired the 35mm F1.2 with the 60MP Sony a7R IV and the 47MP Leica SL2 in the field, and tested it in the lab with the a7R IV and Imatest software. Its imaging capabilities are, in a word, fantastic. At f/1.2, it manages 4,414 lines on a center-weighted evaluation, but there's no drop in quality as you move from center all the way to the edges of the frame. You'll get resolution that is excellent, wide open, from edge to edge.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

There's a slight improvement at f/1.4 (4,542 lines) and f/2 (4,696 lines). At f/2.8 resolution crosses into outstanding territory (5,385 lines), which is maintained all the way through f/8. We see a modest drop at f/11 (4,558 lines) and a bigger one at f/16 (3,918 lines), but really, you should feel comfortable using any f-stop. You'll be able to capture shots with multi-point sunstars at f/16.

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

Optics aren't absolutely perfect. The lens shows modest barrel distortion, about 2.2 percent, which may detract from scenes with perfectly straight lines. You can correct for this pretty easily—if you use Adobe Lightroom you'll enjoy one-click correction, but most Raw processors offer manual distortion correction.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

There's also a vignette visible at f/1.2 and f/1.4. The Lightroom profile removes it, brightening corners so they're as well illuminated as the center of your image. It's not something you'll notice in every shot, and you may prefer to leave it unadjusted, as it gives portraits a natural frame.

Cost of Performance

If all we cared about was resolution, the Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art would be a five-star performer. You will be hard-pressed to find another lens to match it. It opens to f/1.2, something that few full-frame lenses offer, and delivers outstanding resolution from center to edge. Add in build quality that's decidedly pro, and you've got a lens that can capture stunning scenes, and do so in environments where you daren't take others.

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art : Sample Image

You pay for this, though not in the way you might expect. At $1,500, the Sigma 35mm is certainly pricey, but it's not out of line. The Sony FE 35mm F1.4 costs $100 more, and while Panasonic doesn't sell a 35mm in L-mount at this point, its Lumix S Pro 50mm F1.4 costs $2,300.

But, if you're walking around a city with your camera around your neck, or on your feet from day to night covering a wedding ceremony and reception, the Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN weighs on you. Whether or not you're willing to live with that is your decision entirely.

I'm happy that lenses like the Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art exist. They've got a lot of appeal for photographers who value performance over everything. But, aside from the f-stop, you won't lose much by opting for the $750 Sony FE 35mm F1.8, a 9.9-ounce featherweight, or Sigma's own compact 45mm F2.8 DG DN Contemporary.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art - Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art

Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art Review

4.0 Excellent

You might not like the bulk, but you won't find many faults with the optics inside Sigma's 35mm F1.2 DG DN Art lens.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio