PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sony 35mm f/1.8 Prime Lens

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras
 & More »
Our Experts
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sony 35mm f/1.8 Prime Lens - Digital Cameras
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS lens offers a bright aperture and standard angle of view for capturing sharp images with a shallow depth of field.
Best Deal£319

Buy It Now

£319

Pros & Cons

    • Light and compact.
    • Wide aperture.
    • Optical stabilization.
    • Sharp results.
    • Distortion-free photos.
    • Some off-center softness at wide aperture.
    • Omits weather protection.

Sony 35mm f/1.8 Prime Lens Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) N/A mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 52.5
Dimensions 1.8 by 2.5 inches
Lens Mount Sony E
Stabilization Optical
Type Lens
Weight 5.4

The Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS ($449.99) is the company's standard-angle lens for its APS-C mirrorless camera system. The compact prime—it doesn't offer zoom—opens all the way up to f/1.8, so you can capture better shots in dim light and blur backgrounds behind your subject. It also sports optical stabilization, a plus for both stills and video. The only thing missing is weather protection, a feature that rival Fujifilm builds into its APS-C mirrorless lenses, but Sony reserves for full-frame glass. If you use a sealed camera, consider pairing it with the full-frame FE 35mm F1.8 ($749.99), but be aware you'll lose stabilization and pay a premium.

Compact Standard Prime

The E 35mm F1.8 OSS is a featherweight, measuring just 1.8 by 2.5 inches (HD) and weighing in at 5.4 ounces. It supports 49mm front filters, the same size used by many other of the lenses Sony sells for its APS-C mirrorless system. A reversible lens hood is included, along with front and rear caps.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Sample Image

Some Sony bodies, including the latest a6400 and the premium a6500 include weather protection. But the company hasn't added similar protection to any of its APS-C lenses to date. If weather sealing is a priority, the Fujifilm X system is likely a better platform for your photography. But if you're invested in Sony, using the FE 35mm F1.8 or FE 35mm F2.8, both of which offer dust and splash protection, and can also be used with full-frame Sony cameras.

When paired with an APS-C camera, the E 35mm captures a very similar angle of view to a 50mm on a full-frame system. It's the classic standard angle of view, and when shot at wider aperture your images will show a shallow depth of field, with a sharp plane of focus and blurred background. If you mount the lens to a full-frame camera you can use it with just the APS-C sensor area (at reduced resolution to match the crop), or with the full-frame angle of view. There's a big vignette on a full-frame sensor, shown below.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Full-Frame Vignette

The manual focus ring is the only control surface—stabilization and focus settings are adjusted via the camera body. It turns smoothly, with a ramped response that adjusts focus more quickly as you turn it faster. Peaking and magnification are available as in-body manual focus aids on most Sony cameras. Most folks will opt for autofocus, and the lens delivers quick, quiet focus.

It can lock on as close as 11.8 inches. It's good enough for 1:6.7 magnification. You can certainly snap shots of larger flowers and fill the frame, like the shot above. If you want a true 1:1 macro, Sony offers the E 30mm F3.5 Macro.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Sample Image

The Macro lens doesn't offer stabilization, though, and doesn't capture nearly as much light. The E 35mm opens up to f/1.8 and includes stabilization. With the camera to my eye I was able to shoot consistently shake-free images at shutter speeds as long as 1/8-second.

The stabilization makes the E 35mm a better option for photography in dim light. Of course, you'll have to make sure that you're working with a cooperative subject—candid portraits are out at long shutter speeds. If you really dig shooting in dim light, don't forget about the Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary, which captures more light and costs less, although it's a bit larger.

Good Wide Open, Outstanding Stopped Down

I tested the E 35mm OSS with the 24MP a6400 and Imatest software. The pair manages 1,933 lines when shot wide open, a result that falls in our acceptable range. Images are going to look great on Instagram, but if you start to crop in or want to print really big, you'll notice that some details aren't as crisp as others.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Sample Image

Results are just a little bit better at f/2 (1,966). Edges are on the soft side at both f/1.8 and f/2, hovering around 1,600 lines, though the shallow depth of field will make them irrelevant for most images. But if you're shooting a landscape or other scene where everything is at distance, use a narrower f-stop if there's enough light to do so.

There's a significant jump in resolution at f/2.8, to 2,534 lines, an excellent result. There is a drop in resolution as you move away from center, to about 2,100 lines—good, but not excellent.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Sample Image

For landscapes and other shots where you're more concerned about ultimate resolution than shallow depth of field, we recommend working at f/4 (3,143 lines), f/5.6 (3,309 lines), or f/11 (2,974 lines). Diffraction reduces image quality at the narrowest settings—2,430 lines at f/16 and 1,384 lines at f/22.

The Sigma 30mm lens is sharper at wider f-stops, but not quite as crisp when stopped down—pretty typical for an f/1.4 design. We also tested it on an a6400 with the same chart, so a direct comparison is possible. It shows 2,302 lines at f/1.4, 2,851 lines at f/2, and settles in around 3,000 lines at f/2.8 through f/8.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Sample Image

The Sigma does show some barrel distortion (2.8 percent), where the Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS shows none. Likewise, the Sigma lens shows a little bit of a corner vignette at f/1.4 (-1.3EV), while the corners of the Sony lens show an imperceptible -0.7EV drop. We don't put a lot of weight on either issue, as they're not likely to distract from a lot of images, and are very easily rectified with basic software. Adobe Lightroom includes a one-click correction profile for both lenses.

Small, Light, and Stabilized

The E 35mm F1.8 OSS is a little gem of a lens. It's tiny and light, so it's not going to add too much weight to your camera bag. Stabilization is handy, especially if you use a body without it, and it has a bright aperture for working in dim light and for capturing photos with a blurred background.

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS : Sample Image

We wish Sony included weather protection, a feature it includes in its full-frame lens lineup. The a6400 and a6500 both offer dust and splash protection, but only when paired with a full-frame FE lens.

We're awarding the E 35mm F1.8 OSS the same rating as the Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary. The Sony wins on stabilization and weight, while the Sigma earns marks in sharpness and price. Both are fine options for Sony system owners.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sony 35mm f/1.8 Prime Lens - Digital Cameras

Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS Review

4.0 Excellent

The Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS lens offers a bright aperture and standard angle of view for capturing sharp images with a shallow depth of field.

Get It Now
Best Deal£319

Buy It Now

£319

About Our Experts

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio