PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH.

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. - Digital Cameras
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. lens makes some compromises to achieve its small size, but it's impressively sharp and optically stabilized.
Best Deal£169

Buy It Now

£169

Pros & Cons

    • Sharp throughout zoom range.
    • Very compact.
    • Optically stabilized.
    • No manual focus ring.
    • Distortion at wide angle.
    • Modest zoom range.
    • Pricey.

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 64 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 24
Dimensions 0.9 by 2.2 inches
Lens Mount Micro Four Thirds
Optical Zoom 2.7 x
Stabilization In-Lens
Type Lens
Weight 2.5

The Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. ($349.95 direct) is a compact zoom lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras. It was introduced as the standard kit zoom for the pocketable Lumix GM1($660.00 at Amazon), but is also available for purchase on its own. Its slim design is made possible by its collapsible design, but it also omits a few common features (including a manual focus ring) in order to maintain its figure. It's not quite as slim as a power zoom lens like the Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ($224.00 at Amazon) or Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH.($349.00 at Amazon), but it's sharper than either of those lenses and offers a slightly wider field of view.

The 12-32mm($230.33 at Amazon) offers a full-frame equivalent field of view of about 24-64mm, placing it in the wide-angle to long standard-angle category. It's a bit wider, but lacks the telephoto reach, of most Micro Four Thirds kit lenses; they are typically 14-42mm designs. When collapsed, the 12-32mm measures just 0.9 by 2.2 inches (HD). It weighs 2.5 ounces and uses small 37mm front filters. There's no need to trip a locking switch when moving in and out of the collapsed state, as you do with the Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II R($224.00 at Amazon), which is a win in terms of ergonomics. The Panasonic lens also has a metal mount, and feels a lot sturdier than the all-plastic collapsible Olympus lens.

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. : Sample Image

The minimum focus distance is 7.9 inches, which delivers a decidedly non-macro 0.13x magnification factor. This isn't the best lens for getting close; if you want a Micro Four Thirds zoom lens with a good macro function, consider the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm, but be aware that's a much larger lens. The Olympus lens, like the others made by that company, lacks optical stabilization—Olympus puts that into camera bodies, not lenses. So if you shoot with a Panasonic Micro Four Thirds body, you're best served with a lens that has integrated stabilization, as most from Panasonic do.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the lens when paired with the GM1. At 12mm f/3.5 it scored 2,118 lines per picture height using a center-weighted test, better than the 1,800 lines we require to call a photo sharp. Most of the frame held up, with only the outer edges showing some softness (1,357 lines). Narrowing the aperture does nothing to improve the performance; resolution actually dropped off at f/8 due to diffraction. I measured some barrel distortion at 12mm at about 2.2 percent, which makes straight lines appear noticeably curved outward. This can be corrected in Lightroom or a similar application, but keep in mind that your frame will narrow slightly with correction due to the scope of the distortion.

Zooming to 18mm drops the distortion to 0.8 percent, which is barely worth worrying about. The maximum aperture is f/4.2 at this focal length, and the lens still shows good sharpness. It recorded 2,132 lines, and the very outer edges held up well at 1,625 lines. Stopping down to f/5.6 bumped performance just a bit to 2,249 lines, with edges just shy of 1,700 lines. At the maximum 32mm f/5.6 focal length the lens shows about the same amount of barrel distortion (0.9 percent), and sharpness holds up; it scored 2,065 lines on the center-weighted test, with some falloff at the very edges of the frame (1,537 lines). Considering its size, the lens exceeded our expectations. It outperforms both the Olympus and Panasonic 14-42mm power zooms, although it doesn't offer the telephoto reach of either of those compact zooms.

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. : Sample Image

If you're in the market for a slim zoom for a Micro Four Thirds camera, the Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. is a solid choice. It doesn't have the reach of the 14-42mm power zooms that are offered by Panasonic and Olympus, but it's a bit wider and sharper than either of those lenses. The 12-32mm does have a few drawbacks—there's noticeable distortion at its widest angle, and videographers who prefer manual focus will want to look elsewhere as there's no physical focus ring on the lens. But if you're in want of a slim zoom for your Micro Four Thirds camera, and don't feel that the Olympus or Panasonic 14-42mm power zoom lenses are right for you, the Lumix G Vario 12-32mm is worth consideration.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. - Digital Cameras

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. Review

3.5 Good

The Panasonic Lumix G Vario 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. lens makes some compromises to achieve its small size, but it's impressively sharp and optically stabilized.

Get It Now
Best Deal£169

Buy It Now

£169

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio