PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM - Digital Cameras
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM is a solid alternative to Leica glass for rangefinder shooters, but it's not that sharp at the edges.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Wide field of view.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Excellent center-weighted sharpness.
    • 0.5-meter close focus.
    • Solid build quality.
    • Edges of the frame are a little fuzzy.
    • Manual focus only.
    • Hood not included.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 21
Dimensions 3 by 2.1 inches
Type Lens
Weight 9.9

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM ($1,428 list) is one of two 21mm lenses available from Zeiss for Leica and other M-mount rangefinder cameras. It's quite compact compared to similar SLR lenses that cover a full-frame field of view, and manages to show very little distortion. Via a simple adapter it can also be paired with mirrorless cameras, ranging from Micro Four Thirds models from Olympus to pro-level full-frame Sony Alpha 7R($629.99 at Amazon). Its field of view will narrow a bit if you use it on a camera without a full-frame sensor: its field of view is roughly 42mm on Micro Four Thirds and 32mm on APS-C.

The lens measures in at 3 by 2.1 inches (HD), weighs about 9.9 ounces, and supports 46mm front filters. It's available in a silver or black finish, but there's no hood included. You can add the Zeiss hood for $84; that hood can also be used for the Distagon T* 2,8/25 ZM lens. The aperture can be narrowed to f/22 in third-stop increments. It can focus to 0.5 meter, which is a bit closer than the closest equivalent Leica lens, the Super-Elmar-M 21mm f/3.4 ASPH. ($2,995), which is limited to 0.7-meter focus—but if you use a rangefinder camera, you'll only have coupled focus to 0.7 meter. Voigtlander makes one film rangefinder with 21mm framelines in the finder, but most shooters using cameras that don't support Live View will need to invest in an external optical finder in order to get accurate framing—Zeiss sells one for $375. Like all M-mount glass, only manual focus is supported.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM : Sample Image

Compared to SLR lenses that cover a similar field of view, the Zeiss Biogon is impressively compact. But it's not the smallest 21mm you can get for a rangefinder camera. Voigtlander sells the 21mm Color-Skopar f/4 ($419), which is small enough to qualify as a pancake lens, and Zeiss also has the compact C Biogon T* 4,5/21 ZM( at Amazon) in its lineup. If size isn't your primary concern, there's also the 21mm Voigtlander Ultron f/1.8 ($1,149), which captures more than twice as light as the Biogon T* 2,8/21 at its maximum aperture.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness and distortion characteristics of the lens when paired with the full-frame Leica M (Typ 240)($2,969.00 at Amazon). At f/2.8 it is impressively sharp using our center-weighted testing method, scoring 2,367 lines per picture height. But this high score (much better than the 1,800 lines we require for a photo to be called sharp) doesn't hold up at the edges of the frame. The right and left sides of our test chart are noticeably fuzzy, and Imatest shows that the lens manages to just 462 lines along the edges at f/2.8.

Sharpness improves as you narrow the aperture. At f/4 the center-weight score is 2,750 lines, but edges are still fuzzy (538 lines). Moving to f/5.6 improves the average score to 3,070 lines, and the edges improve to 797 lines. Close examination shows some fuzziness, but edges are more defined than they were at f/4. At f/8 the lens delivers its best overall performance: 3,066 lines using the center-weighted score, and the edges improve to 1,253 lines. There's some more improvement along the edges at f/11—they hit 1,675 lines, which is visibly crisp to my eye—but the center and overall score drops to 2,800 lines due to diffraction. There's just a little bit of distortion, about 0.7 percent of the pincushion variety, but that's negligible in field conditions.

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM : Sample Image

If you like a wide field of view and are a rangefinder shooter, the Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM is a solid option, especially if a Leica lens is out of your budget. There are other options available for this focal length, including a smaller lens from Zeiss and a pair of lenses from Voigtlander, but the Biogon T* does a good job balancing image quality, cost, and size. Its edge sharpness at wider apertures leaves a bit to be desired, but it does deliver at narrower apertures. If you want a lens that does a better job from edge-to-edge in this price range, the Zeiss C Biogon T* 4,5/21 ZM is worth a look, but keep in mind that it shows color shift in the corners that requires some work with software (or black-and-white conversion) to remove.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM - Digital Cameras

Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM Review

3.5 Good

The Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM is a solid alternative to Leica glass for rangefinder shooters, but it's not that sharp at the edges.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio