PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS - Digital Cameras
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS is a compact 4.4x zoom that offers a constant f/4 aperture and optical stabilization.

Pros & Cons

    • Sharp throughout zoom range.
    • 4.4x zoom ratio.
    • Optically stabilized.
    • Compact.
    • Sturdy build.
    • Includes hood.
    • Pricey.
    • Some softness at edges.
    • A little distortion.

Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 105 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 24
Dimensions 3 by 2.6 inches
Optical Zoom 4.4 x
Stabilization Optical
Type Lens
Weight 10.9

The Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS ($999.99) is a compact zoom lens for Sony E-mount cameras. It's designed for use with APS-C models like the Alpha 5000, but will also work (at a lower resolution) with the full-frame Alpha 7 and 7R($629.99 at Amazon). It's a 4.4x zoom that covers a 24-105mm (35mm equivalent) field of view, with a maximum f/4 aperture throughout. It's one of the better zooms that we've seen for mirrorless cameras, but doesn't quite match the edge-to-edge sharpness and f/2.8 aperture that Olympus achieved with its Editors' Choice winning M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f2.8 PRO($849.00 at Amazon) zoom for the competing Micro Four Thirds system.

The lens($998.00 at Amazon) measures 3 by 2.6 inches (HD), weighs 10.9 ounces, and supports 55mm front filters; all-in-all it's an impressively compact package when you consider its zoom range and aperture. The lens barrel is metal and a reversible hood is included. Despite utilizing a telescoping design that extends a bit when zoomed, it feels quite sturdy; there's no give or wobble to the barrel when extended. Both the large zoom ring and narrower manual focus ring have a ribbed, textured surface that offers quite a bit of grip when adjusting the lens. There are no switches on the lens—it does have optical stabilization, so if you want to disable that you'll have to dive into a camera menu to do so.

Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS : Sample Image

I used Imatest to check the sharpness and distortion characteristics when paired with the 20-megapixel Alpha 5000($549.95 at Amazon). At 16mm f/4 it does much better than the center-weighted 1,800 lines per picture height score that we use to define an image as sharp; it manages 2,475 lines there, and maintains its sharpness through all but the outer edges of the frame (1,538 lines). Stopping down to f/5.6 bumps the center and edge scores (2,529 and 1,674 lines respectively), and at f/8 the edges top 1,800 lines. There's some barrel distortion here, about 1.7 percent. It's noticeable, but pretty easy to correct with minimal changes to your frame in Lightroom or another workflow application.

At 23mm the sharpness holds up, even at f/4 (2,366 lines), but the edges are a bit softer—1,382 lines at f/4 and 1,523 lines at f/8. If you have in-focus details at the outer parts of the frame you'll notice some softness, but for most shots it won't be a major concern. The edge sharpness story remains the same through 70mm. This focal length is where we see almost zero distortion.

When zoomed to 35mm the distortion switches to pincushion, which causes straight lines to curve inward instead of outward. There's only 1.2 percent (a figure match through the rest of the zoom range), which will be noticeable in some shots, but is very easy to correct. The center-weighted sharpness at f/4 is 2,239 lines and at f/5.6 it's 2,437 lines. At 53mm f/4 the lens shows 2,198 lines, improving as you stop down until it peaks at 2,480 lines at f/8.

Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS : Sample Image

The weakest performance is at 70mm; the lens shows 1,951 lines using the center-weighted score. The mid-parts of the frame—the area between the center third and the outer edges—are a tad soft at 1,733 lines. Stopping down to f/5.6 bumps the overall score to 2,246 lines with all but the outer edges topping 2,000 lines.

The Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS isn't the flat-out best zoom we've seen for a mirrorless camera, but it's certainly the best one available for owners of the NEX-7($656.86 at Amazon) and other APS-C Sony E-mount cameras. There's a little bit of distortion, and some softness at edges and corners of the frame, but overall it's an optic that I wouldn't hesitate to shoot at its maximum aperture at any focal length. It's quite compact given its zoom range, and sturdily built. Many Sony shooters who are willing to spend $1,000 on a lens have undoubtedly upgraded to a full-frame mirrorless Alpha model, but shooters who prefer the telephoto advantage and larger depth of field that go hand-in-hand with an APS-C sensor can look to this lens as a long overdue premium option for the E-mount system. We didn't quite like it enough to call it Editors' Choice (the Olympus PRO zoom for Micro Four Thirds is just a bit better, albeit with a shorter zoom range), but it didn't fall too short of that mark.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS - Digital Cameras

Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS Review

4.0 Excellent

The Sony Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS is a compact 4.4x zoom that offers a constant f/4 aperture and optical stabilization.

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio