PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO Review

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO Review - Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro delivers top-end image quality and a bright aperture for the Micro Four Thirds system, but is a bit too big for smaller cameras.
Best Deal£709.99

Buy It Now

£709.99

Pros & Cons

    • Bright maximum aperture.
    • Very sharp.
    • No distortion.
    • Strong close focus capability.
    • All-weather build.
    • Manual focus clutch.
    • Moderate corner dimness at f/1.2.
    • No optical stabilization.
    • Doesn't pair well with smaller bodies.
    • Pricey.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro Specs

Dimensions 3.4 by 2.7 inches
Full-Frame Equivalent (Wide) 34
Mount Micro Four Thirds
Optical Stabilization None
Weight 13.8

Olympus wowed us last year with its first f/1.2 prime lens, a standard-angle 25mm prime with excellent build quality and optics. Now photographers who crave a wider angle can benefit from the same bright aperture, build quality, and top-end imaging with the Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO ($1,199). Like its 25mm and 45mm siblings it is sturdily built, with a metal barrel, manual focus clutch, and weather sealing, and like them it earns our Editors' Choice. It's the lens to get if you're a fan of a moderately wide angle of view and crave the depth of field control offered by an extremely wide aperture. If your budget is tighter, or you put more of a value on a compact, lightweight design, don't forget about the M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f1.8, which is a strong performer in its own right.

Design

Olympus set the design motif for the f1.2 PRO series with its first release, the 25mm f1.2. The 17mm is about the same size, coming in at 3.4 by 2.7 inches (HD) and 13.8 ounces, with support for 62mm front filters. Compare that with the svelte 17mm f1.8, which covers the same angle of view but only gathers about 40 percent as much light at its widest f-stop. The 17mm f1.8 is 1.4 by 2.3 inches and weighs 4.2 ounces.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO : Sample Image

But it's not just the extra light that sets the 17mm f1.2 apart from the smaller f1.8 lens. The f1.2 PRO is sealed against dust and moisture, so it pairs well with cameras with weather sealing. That's good, because you really want to pair the big lens with a body with a deeper handgrip like the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II or Panasonic G9. It will be a bit front heavy on smaller, slimmer cameras.

The 17mm is housed in a black metal barrel with silver and blue rings toward the front. A reversible lens hood is included, as are caps and a soft carrying pouch. There is a lone control button on the barrel, marked L-Fn—its function can be set by an Olympus camera. Unlike some Micro Four Thirds lenses, there is no optical stabilization built in. Instead the 17mm relies on the in-body stabilization offered by Olympus cameras. Thankfully the system is effective for the wide angle—about 35mm in full-frame terms—captured by the lens.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO : Sample Image

The knurled metal focus ring occupies much of the barrel. To switch to manual focus you pull it back toward you. Because of the design, the lens delivers solid resistance and tactile feedback when focusing manually, with hard stops at the minimum focus distance and infinity. It's a departure from many mirrorless lenses, which typically have focus rings that turn continuously without any additional resistance.

Close focus is available to 7.9 inches (0.2-meter). The wide field of view means that the lens is hardly useful for macro shots, but you can still get pretty close to your subject. At the closest focus distance it projects subjects onto the image sensor at 1:6.7 life-size. That's about twice as large as the Olympus 17mm f1.8 ($349.00 at Amazon) , which focuses to 9.8 inches and captures subject at 1:12.5 at its closest focus setting.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO : Sample Image

Image Quality

I tested the 17mm f1.2 with the 20MP OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The lens delivers very sharp results from edge to edge, even when shot wide open. At f/1.2 it scores 2,643 lines on a standard center-weighted Imatest sharpness test. Resolution is strong right up to the edges of our test chart, which show 2,618 lines. These are excellent numbers for a 20MP camera; we consider results to be acceptable at 1,800 lines.

Resolution is steady at f/1.4, with 2,679 lines. It plateaus early, showing the strongest results at f/2 (2,820 lines), f/2.8 (2,851 lines), and f/4 (2,860 lines). There's a negligible drop at f/5.6 (2,728 lines). You lose a little bit of clarity at f/8 (2,585 lines) and f/11 (2,322 lines), but you should feel free to use them when you need a larger depth of field. You should avoid shooting at the minimum aperture, f/16, as diffraction drops the score to 1,827 lines.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO : Sample Image

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

Olympus touts the quality of the bokeh, the out-of-focus area behind your subject, describing it as feathered. I recommend taking any claims of bokeh quality with a grain of salt. The distance between camera and subject, in conjunction with the makeup and distance between subject and background, and of course the working aperture, all contribute to how the background of your image looks. You can certainly blur out backgrounds with the 17mm at wider apertures, and I didn't note any oddities in backgrounds in shots with a shallow depth of field.

The sequence above, shot handheld (apologies for the slight changes in framing), is just one example of how the lens draws a scene from f/1.2 through its minimum f/16 aperture. I was working reasonably close to the minimum focus distance, in order to blur out the background as much as possible. But remember that this is a 17mm lens, so you're going to start to see distant subjects take shape at wider apertures.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO : Sample Image

The lens doesn't show any distortion. There is some corner dimness at wider apertures, but it's not extreme. We see a -1.4EV drop at f/1.2 and -1.1EV at f/1.4. This gives scenes a very modest. but visible, vignette. At narrower settings the vignette is barely noticeable, and then gone. We see -0.9EV at f/2, -0.7EV at f/2.8, and from f/4 and beyond a completely negligible -0.4EV.

Conclusions

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO doesn't offer quite the same amount of depth of field control as a good 35mm f/1.4 lens on a full-frame system, but it comes fairly close, and it does so while delivering extremely crisp results from edge to edge. And while it's larger for a Micro Four Thirds lens, it does well with the pro-level bodies with which it's likely to be paired. It earns our Editors' Choice, and should be at the top of the list for M43 photographers who love the 35mm angle of view and crave the best image quality available, with build quality to match. It is a little pricey, so if you're on a budget, prefer a lighter lens, and don't need weather sealing, take a look at the more affordable Olympus 17mm f1.8 as an alternative.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO Review - Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 17mm f1.2 PRO Review

4.0 Excellent

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.2 Pro delivers top-end image quality and a bright aperture for the Micro Four Thirds system, but is a bit too big for smaller cameras.

Get It Now
Best Deal£709.99

Buy It Now

£709.99

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio