PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Pros & Cons

If you've shopped for an ultra-wide zoom in recent years, you've no doubt come across the excellent Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD. But Tamron doesn't make its wide-angle marvel for Pentax cameras, at least under its own banner. The Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR ($1,449.95) is a rebadged version of the Tamron zoom, without the stabilization system, a feature that Pentax builds into its camera bodies rather than its lenses. It's a bulky zoom, even when paired with the full-frame K-1, but an excellent performer and a solid choice for Pentax shooters in want of an ultra-wide zoom.

Design
The 15-30mm measures 5.7 by 3.9 inches (HD), weighs 2.3 pounds, and has a huge, bulbous front element that precludes the use of lens filters. An o-ring sits at the base, completing the weather sealing that you get with a Pentax SLR. A modest lens hood is built in—and while I didn't see any flares or ghosting when shooting with the Pentax version of the lens, they did appear occasionally when shooting with the Tamron, so be mindful of where the sun is when shooting at 15mm.

Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR : Sample Image

The lens doesn't have any control switches—image stabilization isn't included, as that feature is built into Pentax SLR bodies. Zoom is adjusted via a large, rubberized focus ring, finished in a texture that's easy to grip. Focal length is marked at 15, 18, 20, 24, and 30mm.

A narrower manual focus ring sits closer to the mount, finished in the same texture. It can turn at any time, even when the camera is set to autofocus, so you can make fine adjustments to focus as desired. A window shows the current focus distance, marked in both feet and meters. Focus is driven by an internal motor that's quick to move the glass inside the lens to acquire a lock. It's also quiet.

Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR : Sample Image

The 15-30mm focuses from 11 inches (28cm) to infinity, as measured from the image sensor. This allows you to focus very close to the front element, getting up close and personal with subjects to capture images with a vast background, and delivering 1:5 magnification at 30mm.

Image Quality
I paired the 15-30mm with the 36MP K-1 for our standard round of performance tests. At 15mm f/2.8, Imatest shows that the lens scores 2,311 lines per picture height on a center-weighted sharpness test, better than the 2,200 lines we want to see in an image. Performance is strong throughout the frame, even at the edges. At f/4 the scores improves to 2,749 lines, and it remains steady at 2,763 lines at f/5.6. You get the best results at f/8 (2,921 lines) and f/11 (2,905 lines) before losing a bit of clarity at f/16 (2,744 lines) and f/22 (2,422 lines).

Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR : Sample Image

At 24mm image quality remains very strong. At f/2.8 the resolution is 2,728 lines, with strong performance from edge to edge. Image quality is steady at f/4 (2,724 lines), f/5.6 (2,753 lines), f/8 (2,896 lines), and f/11 (2,907 lines). There's a modest drop at f/16 (2,753 lines) and f/22 (2,424 lines).

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

The story is about the same at 30mm. The lens manages 2,698 lines at f/2.8, improves to 2,812 lines at f/4, and gets better as you stop down further—2,868 lines at f/5.6, 2,959 lines at f/8, 2,988 lines at f/11, and 2,936 lines at f/16. There's a drop in fidelity at f/22 (2,418 lines).

Barrel distortion is a noticeable issue at 15mm. The lens shows about 4.5 percent, which gives images a mild fish-eye look. As you zoom distortion changes. At 20mm there is none, and it gives way to pincushion distortion at 24mm and 30mm.

Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR : Sample Image

Corner dimness is also noticeable. At 15mm f/2.8 the corners lag behind the center by about 2.5 stops (-2.5EV), a deficit that's cut to -1.6EV at f/4 and is less than -1EV at narrower apertures. At 21mm and 30mm f/2.8 the corners drop by -1.8EV, which is cut to -1EV at f/4 and less than a stop at narrower apertures. Illumination and distortion can both be compensated for in-camera if you shoot JPG. If you opt for Raw capture you can correct for it using a lens profile built into Lightroom.

Conclusions
As is the case with the Tamron 15-30mm, the Pentax clone is a big, bulky lens. But that's par for the course with wide-angle zooms, and when you consider that the 15-30mm is rated at f/2.8 through its entire zoom range and captures images that are sharp from edge to edge, the size is understandable. It does show a bit of distortion, and corners and edges are dim at f/2.8, but both of those performance aspects are easily compensated for using software tools. So if you're in want of an ultra-wide zoom for your full-frame Pentax, you'll be happy to know that the Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR is an excellent performer.

Final Thoughts

The Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR is a huge lens, but one that covers an ultra-wide field of view with excellent sharpness, even at f/2.8. - Lenses

Pentax HD D FA 15-30mm F2.8 ED SDM WR

None

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio