PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM - Digital Cameras
4.5 Outstanding

The Bottom Line

The Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM is a compact lens for rangefinder cameras with a moderate wide-angle field of view. It's extremely sharp from edge to edge, and worthy of our Editors' Choice award.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Very compact.
    • All-metal build.
    • Extremely sharp at all apertures.
    • Manual focus only.
    • Lens hood not incuded.

Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) N/A mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 35
Dimensions 2.2 by 2.0 inches
Lens Mount Leica M
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 7.1

The Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM ($860 list)($749.00 at Amazon) is a super-small 35mm lens for M-mount rangefinder cameras. Despite being priced on the budget end of the Zeiss spectrum, it retains the top-end build quality and actually betters the other lenses in the ZM series in terms of image sharpness. It's an easy pick for our Editors' Choice award, and if you're a rangefinder shooter of want of a 35mm lens it's a good one to get. Of course, it can also be used on mirrorless cameras, including the full-frame Sony Alpha 7R($629.99 at Amazon) and the Micro Four Thirds Olympus OM-D E-M5($499.00 at Amazon) via a simple mechanical adapter.

The lens measures just 2.2 by 2 inches (HD), weighs 7.1 ounces, and supports 43mm front filters. There's a metal lens hood available from Zeiss for $84. The closest Leica lens in terms of focal length and aperture is the 35mm Summarit-M f/2.5 ($1,950); it's a bit smaller at 1.3 by 2 inches, and despite its high asking price it also omits a hood. (And the add-on hood for the Leica is priced at $130.) Like most rangefinder lenses, the C Biogon has a minimum focus distance of 0.7-meter.

The C Biogon maintains the exquisite build quality shared by the other lenses in the ZM series. Its barrel is metal, its focus ring is tight with smooth operation, and its aperture ring can adjusts from f/2.8 through f/22 in third-stop increments. There's a small nub on the  focusing ring that makes it easy to adjust using a finger; it's not as large as the similar protrusion found on modern Leica lenses, but it gets the job done. There's a depth of field scale printed on the lens with full-stop markings from f/4 through f/22.

Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM : Sample Image

I used Imatest to check the performance of the lens when paired with the full-frame Leica M (Typ 240)($2,969.00 at Amazon). It's incredibly sharp at every tested aperture, and shows absolutely no distortion. At f/2.8 it already scores 2,955 lines per picture height on our center-weighted sharpness test. That's better than the 1,800 lines required to call a photo sharp, and impressively the very edges of the images are extremely sharp at 2,268 lines. The Biogon T* 2/35 ZM doesn't deliver that level of performance until its aperture is narrowed to f/4.

At f/4 the C Biogon improves to a staggering 3,668 lines, and at f/5.6 its at its best at 3,764 lines. Resolution starts to drop due to diffraction, as you stop down from there, but even at f/11 it kisses the 3,000 line mark. Yes, the lens doesn't have the maximum f/2 aperture of its more expensive sibling, but if you're willing to live with an f/2.8 optic you'll be rewarded with images that are absolutely tack sharp.

There's a lot to like about the Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM—it's quite compact, extremely sharp from edge to edge, and is priced attractively (for a Zeiss lens). If you're in want of an M-mount 35mm lens with a wider aperture, but don't want to spend the extra money for the Biogon T* 2/35, there are some alternatives available from Voigtlander. These include the compact Color-Skopar 35mm f/2.5 ($409) and the Nokton 35mm f/1.4 ($629). We haven't tested these as of yet to see how they stack up against the C Biogon, but Voigtlander lenses are generally well built and deliver good—but not off the charts—performance. As it stands the C Biogon earns our Editors' Choice award; it's an excellent 35mm lens for rangefinder and mirrorless camera shooters alike.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM - Digital Cameras

Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM Review

4.5 Outstanding

The Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM is a compact lens for rangefinder cameras with a moderate wide-angle field of view. It's extremely sharp from edge to edge, and worthy of our Editors' Choice award.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio