PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 - Digital Cameras
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 is an excellent standard-angle lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras, and an affordable alternative to Panasonic's lens.
Best Deal£349.06

Buy It Now

£349.06

Pros & Cons

    • Wide aperture.
    • Impeccably sharp.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Compact.
    • Includes lens hood.
    • Lacks focus clutch.
    • Not weather sealed.

Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 50
Dimensions 1.6 by 2.2 inches
Lens Mount Micro Four Thirds
Type Lens
Weight 4.8

The Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 ($399.99 direct)($299.00 at Amazon) is one of a handful of standard-angle prime lenses currently available for Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras, and the first entry from Olympus. It's priced attractively, but it doesn't capture as much light as the Panasonic Leica 25mm f/1.4 ($599.99) or the manual focus Voigtlander Nokton 25mm f/0.95. Its optical quality is excellent; images are sharp from edge to edge, even at f/1.8, and distortion is minimal. It's a lens that's deserving of accolades, and earns our Editors' Choice award.

The lens is fairly compact, but it's by no means a pancake. It measures 1.6 by 2.2 inches (HD), weighs 4.8 ounces, and supports 46mm filters. A reversible hood is included; it bayonets around the front of the lens, but you'll need to remove a decorative ring to mount it. The M.Zuiko can focus on objects as close as 9.4 inches, which hardly makes it a macro design—if you want to focus closer, consider the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f2.8 Macro($399.00 at Amazon).

Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 : Sample Image

It's not weather sealed, which is a concern if you're an all-weather shooter with a sealed camera like the Olympus OM-D E-M5($499.00 at Amazon) or EM-1($799.95 at Amazon). And the build quality, while solid, isn't on par with the all-metal M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f1.8($349.00 at Amazon). That lens also features a focus clutch mechanism for quick changes between manual and automatic focus—just pull back on the ring to switch to manual, or push it forward for autofocus. You'll need to toggle the focus mode in-camera with the 25mm. There's no optical stabilization either: Olympus Micro Four Thirds cameras have that feature in the body. Panasonic shooters (with the exception of GX7 owners, which is currently the lone Lumix Micro Four Thirds camera with in-body stabilization) may be concerned, but neither the Panasonic 25mm f/1.4 nor the Voigtlander Nokton f/0.95 include optical stabilization.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the lens when paired with the OM-D E-M10($738.00 at Amazon). At f/1.8 it records 2,201 lines per picture height, which is noticeably sharper than the 1,800 lines we require to define an image as sharp. Impressively, the edges are nearly as sharp as the center at 1,956 lines. Stopping down to f/2.8 improves the score only modestly (2,259 lines), and the best performance is at f/4 (2,284 lines). Barrel distortion is a nonissue; the lens shows 0.6 percent, which is irrelevant in field conditions. The Voigtlander Nokton is just as sharp at comparable apertures and it can focus a bit closer, but it's a manual focus design. If you're willing to forgo autofocus and deal with a larger, heavier lens, you'll be rewarded with the ability to capture about 3.6 times the light at its f/0.95 aperture—but the lens is downright soft (1,380 lines) at that setting. It doesn't start to perform at acceptable levels until f/1.4, and doesn't top 2,000 lines until f/2.

Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 : Sample Image

But the Nokton is three times the cost of the Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8. If you're in want of a standard-angle lens for a Micro Four Thirds camera, the Olympus is our pick as Editors' Choice. It's incredibly sharp, compact, and fairly light. It won't give you the light-gathering capabilities or shallow depth of field of an f/0.95 lens in all situations, but you can definitely get that look with the right shot. If you prefer a wider field of view the Olympus 17mm is as impressive of a performer, and includes the focus clutch mechanism, and there's also the M.Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f1.8($499.99 at Amazon) and M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f1.8($898.00 at Amazon) for photographers who prefer a tighter field of view.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 - Digital Cameras

Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 Review

4.0 Excellent

The Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 is an excellent standard-angle lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras, and an affordable alternative to Panasonic's lens.

Get It Now
Best Deal£349.06

Buy It Now

£349.06

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio