PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ - Digital Cameras
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ isn't a top-shelf optical performer, but it is impressively compact.
Best Deal£279.56

Buy It Now

£279.56

Pros & Cons

    • Very compact.
    • Power zoom operation.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • So-so performance at maximum aperture.
    • Edge sharpness leaves a lot to be desired.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 84 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 28
Dimensions 0.9 by 2.4" inches
Lens Mount Micro Four Thirds
Optical Zoom 3 x
Type Lens
Weight 3.2

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ ($349.99 direct)($224.00 at Amazon) isn't the sharpest lens available for Micro Four Thirds cameras, but it's one of the smallest zooms that you'll find for any camera. If you value compactness, and are willing to shoot at a narrower aperture for maximum image quality, it delivers images that are just a bit sharper than the similar Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH.($84.99 at Amazon) If you value image quality over size, consider the M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm f3.5-5.6 EZ, which offers a longer zoom range, a weatherproof design, and a macro shooting mode.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ : Sample Image

The lens is really, really small. It measures just 0.9 by 2.4 inches (HD), weighs 3.2 ounces, and supports 37mm threaded filters. It's a power zoom design, so it extends when you power up the camera; the zoom action is controlled by the textured ring that surrounds the lens barrel. The zoom action is smooth and quiet.The minimum focus distance varies based on focal length—you can get as close as 7.9 inches at 14mm and 9.8 inches at 42mm. Olympus doesn't offer a hood for the lens, nor does it include image stabilization: Olympus cameras have that feature in the body, not the lens.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the lens when paired with the OM-D E-M10($738.00 at Amazon). Compact designs like this often fall short of our 1,800-line sharpness mark, and suffer from edge performance issues. The 14-42mm is no different; at its widest angle and aperture it manages 1,640 lines per picture height using a center-weighted metric. The center resolution approaches 2,000 lines, but as you move partway from the center the lens manages just 1,400 lines, and edges fall just shy of 1,000.

Narrowing the aperture to f/5.6 improves performance dramatically. The center-weighted score jumps all the way to 2,284 lines, with edges that near 1,200 lines. There's a modest edge performance increase at f/8, they manage 1,334 lines there. There's a bit of barrel distortion, about 1 percent, at 14mm, but that's just barely noticeable in field conditions. The compact Panasonic power zoom performs similarly at 14mm—1,676 lines at f/3.5, but stopping down to f/5.6 only improves the sharpness to 1,719 lines.

Zoooming to 28mm narrows the maximum aperture to f/4.9. The lens scores 1,651 lines here, with edges that score 1,511 lines. Stopping down just a bit to f/5.6 improves the score to 1,829 lines, with edges that approach 1,600 lines. At 42mm f/5.6 the lens delivers it best wide-open performance at 2,018 lines with edges that score 1,644 lines. Stopping down to f/8 improves the center-weighted score to 2,244 lines with 1,700-line edges. There's no distortion worth mentioning at 28mm or 42mm. The Panasonic power zoom managed 1,670 lines at 28mm, but its score topped to 1,485 lines at 42mm.

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ : Sample Image

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ is a lens that's a good choice for Micro Four Thirds shooters who value compact design over all, but it comes with some caveats. It's much better built than the all-plastic Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II R($224.00 at Amazon) kit lens, but its sharpness doesn't quite measure up. We found it to be a better all-around performer than similar Panasonic 14-42mm power zoom, especially when stopped down to f/5.6, and it comes in at a slightly lower asking price. If size isn't a major concern, you're better served with a zoom that is a bit larger—and a bit sharper. The Olympus 12-50mm is $150 more, but it delivers better optics, a weatherproof design, macro focusing, and a more ambitious zoom range.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ - Digital Cameras

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ Review

3.5 Good

The Olympus M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ isn't a top-shelf optical performer, but it is impressively compact.

Get It Now
Best Deal£279.56

Buy It Now

£279.56

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio