PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 - Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 captures excellent images and is quite compact, but it's too expensive for what it is.
Best Deal£1583.42

Buy It Now

£1583.42

Pros & Cons

    • Compact.
    • Sharp through zoom range.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Great build quality.
    • Expensive.
    • Lacks optical stabilization.
    • Edges a little soft at widest angle.
    • Some color fringing when shooting JPG.

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 84 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 27
Dimensions 2.4 by 2.5 inches
Lens Mount Leica L
Optical Zoom 3.1 x
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 9

The Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 ($1,750) is one of a pair of lenses that launched with the T (Typ 701) ($1,398.24 at Amazon) mirrorless camera. It's not Leica's first attempt at an autofocusing zoom with this range—the X Vario uses a similar zoom lens—but it's the first for an interchangeable camera system. The Vario-Elmar is quite compact and plenty sharp through its range, though edges are on the soft side at 18mm. But it doesn't include any sort of image stabilization system, and its f/3.5-5.6 variable aperture is unambitious as far as zoom lenses go.

The 18-56mm ($1,895.00 at Amazon)  lens is designed to match the APS-C sensor used by the Leica T, so its field of view is more like a 27-84mm zoom on a full-frame camera system. At 2.8 by 2.6 inches (HD) and 11.6 ounces, it's fairly compact for a zoom lens, and its front element is on the small side, so you can use 52mm threaded filters. A reversible petal-style lens hood is included, as are the standard front and back caps and a carrying pouch. The lens can focus as close as 11.8 inches, which is typical for a zoom of this type.

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 : Sample Image

The Vario-Elmar is styled just like a black Leica rangefinder lens. The focal lengths are marked in yellow at the base of the black metal barrel, and the 18, 24, 35, and 56mm positions are marked in white on the zoom ring. Both the zoom control and manual focus ring feature ridges, so they're easier to grip during operation. One thing that is missing from the lens is image stabilization. Most standard zoom lenses for competing systems zooms offer that function, including the Fujifilm Fujinon 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS ($659.00 at Amazon) for Fuji X mirrorless cameras. Stabilization helps to capture sharper images at longer shutter speeds, and also steadies handheld video.

I used Imatest to check to see how the lens performs with the only compatible camera at this time, the 16-megapixel T (Typ 701). At 18mm f/3.5 its performance is the weakest, but it still scores better than the 1,800 lines per picture height we require to call an image sharp. Its center-weighted score is 1,928 lines, with good even performance through most of the frame. The outer edges of the frame are a little bit soft (1,455 lines), but that's not atypical for a zoom of this design. There's very little sharpness to be gained by stopping down—at f/5.6 the score improves to 2,011 lines, which isn't a significant increase. Barrel distortion is very well controlled; images show about 1.4 percent, which is much less than most 18-55mm designs show.

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 : Sample Image

At 35mm the distortion goes away, and the maximum aperture narrows to f/5. The lens scores 2,116 lines here, with solid performance through the edges of the frame (1,906 lines). Stopping down to f/8 shows a modest increase in the center-weighted score (2,212 lines) and edges (2,120 lines). At 56mm the maximum aperture is a narrow f/5.6, and the center-weighted score is still quite good (1,968 lines). The edges are just a hair shy of the 1,800-line mark at 1,747 lines, but they do hit 1,800 lines at f/8. Distortion is still a nonissue at 56mm.

There is some behind-the-scenes distortion correction going on in camera, but it's applied to both JPG and Raw output, so it's not anything you'll have to worry about when processing images. The processing varies a bit based on the file format. The camera leaves behind some yellow and purple color fringing at the edges of the frame when shooting in JPG, but Lightroom automatically removes it from the Raw file. Lightroom also applies a bit more advanced distortion correction, so if you shoot Raw+JPG and look at the images closely, you'll see that the Raw image has a slightly tighter field of view due to more aggressive distortion correction.

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 : Sample Image

The Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 is a fine performer from an optical standpoint, but for its asking price you'd expect optical stabilization, a wider aperture throughout its zoom range, or both. Leica equipment is generally priced at a premium, but even with that in mind the $1,750 sticker price seems on the high side, which prevents the zoom from getting a higher rating. If you've made the decision to invest in the T system, it's your only choice at the moment for zoom lenses. We'll have to wait and see what lenses Leica will release to round out the system in the future.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 - Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6

Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 Review

3.5 Good

The Leica Vario-Elmar-T 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 captures excellent images and is quite compact, but it's too expensive for what it is.

Get It Now
Best Deal£1583.42

Buy It Now

£1583.42

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio