PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM - Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM lens is a solid replacement for the 18-55mm that shipped with your camera, but another Sigma zoom is our Editors' Choice.
Best Deal£353.08

Buy It Now

£353.08

Pros & Cons

    • Sharp.
    • 4.1x zoom range.
    • 1:2.9 macro magnification.
    • Optical stabilization.
    • Wide aperture.
    • Compact and light.
    • Available for multiple camera systems.
    • Compatibility with Sigma USB dock and mount conversion service.
    • Some distortion.
    • Edge softness at 70mm.

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 105 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 25.5
Dimensions 3.1 by 3.2 inches
Lens Mount Canon EOS
Lens Mount Nikon F
Lens Mount Pentax K
Lens Mount Sigma SA
Lens Mount Sony A
Optical Zoom 4.1 x
Stabilization Optical
Type Lens
Weight 1

When you consider its price, it's hard to argue with the value that the excellent Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM ($499) delivers. Its aperture is wider than the run-of-the-mill 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom lens that ships with most entry-level D-SLRs, and it covers both a wider and longer field of view. Add in image stabilization (for compatible camera systems) and 1:2.9 macro magnification at 70mm and you have a very versatile optic. We recommend it highly to anyone looking to upgrade from an 18-55mm lens, but our Editors' Choice for standard-angle APS-C zoom lenses goes to a shorter, faster zoom—the outstanding Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM($598.00 at Amazon), which maintains a maximum f/1.8 aperture throughout its zoom range.

The lens($322.18 at Amazon) covers a 4.1x zoom range, with a field of view that's equivalent to about 25-105mm on a full-frame camera. It's bigger than an average 18-55mm lens, but at 3.2 by 3.1 inches (HD) and 16.4 ounces, it balances well even on a compact body like Canon EOS Rebel T5. The lens uses larger 72mm front filters and it does extend when zoomed. A lens hood is included; it's reversible for storage. The 17-70mm is available for all of the major APS-C camera systems: Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Sigma, and Sony. If you switch systems it's eligible for Sigma's mount conversion service, and it's compatible with the inexpensive USB Dock($42.00 at Amazon) accessory for fine focus adjustment and firmware updates. Optical stabilization is built into the Canon, Nikon, and Sigma versions of the lens, with a toggle switch on the barrel to turn the system on or off. Pentax and Sony SLRs feature in-body stabilization, so the system is absent if you buy the lens in either of those mounts.

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM : Sample Image

The lens focuses as close as 8.6 inches, which delivers 1:2.9 macro magnification at the 70mm setting. When working that close to subjects you'll be able to get some seriously shallow depth of field, even at f/4 on an APS-C image sensor. The zoom ring occupies the majority of the lens barrel; it's covered in a textured rubber for easy gripping. There's a manual focus ring; it's really narrow and sits right behind the front element. You can only turn it when the focus toggle switch on the side of the lens is set to manual focus mode. It's far from the best manual focus experience I've ever had, thanks to the small size of the ring and the very gentle touch required for precise adjustments due to the shorter focus throw, but the mechanical operation is years ahead of focus-by-wire systems that you'll get with most mirrorless lenses and a few SLR optics like the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM($1,999.00 at Amazon).

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the lens when paired with the 18-megapixel Canon EOS Rebel T5. At 17mm f/2.8 it exceeds the 1,800 lines per picture height we require to call an image sharp, scoring 2,299 lines on our center-weighted test. Images maintain that level of quality through most of the frame, and even the outer edges show a crisp 1,904 lines. Stopping down to f/4 boosts the score to 2,416 lines, and it also hovers around 2,400 lines at f/5.6, with edges that top 2,000 lines.

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM : Sample Image

Zooming to 35mm narrows the aperture to f/3.5; the lens still shows 2,293 lines there, with edges that hit 1,950 lines. Stopping down to f/5.6 boosts the overall score to 2,492 lines and edges to 2,147 lines. At 70mm f/4 the lens is comparatively weak, but with a center-weighted score of 2,047 lines the only real issue is that the edges of the frame score just 1,719 lines. Stopping down to f/5.6 improves things a bit (2,192 lines average and 1,790 lines at the edges), and the entire frame is crisp at f/8 (2,205 lines average, 1,878 lines at the edges of the frame). The Sigma 18-35mm doesn't have the same zoom range, but its images are sharp throughout, even at f/1.8—they show more than 2,300 lines and edges never dip below 1,800 lines.

There is some distortion throughout the zoom range. At 17mm the lens shows 2.8 percent barrel distortion, which causes straight lines to curve noticeably outward. This gives way to pincushion distortion, which does the opposite to straight lines. At 35mm there's 1 percent, which is barely noticeable in field conditions; that increases to 1.2 percent at 70mm, which you may notice when shooting certain subjects. Both barrel and pincushion distortion can be corrected using software like Adobe Photoshop Lightroom.

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM : Sample Image

The Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM is a great choice for anyone who wants to move beyond the 18-55mm kit lens, but doesn't want to sacrifice zoom range in exchange for a wider aperture. Its macro focus capability projects subjects onto your camera's sensor about one-third life size, and the f/2.8-4 aperture makes it possible to shoot in more questionable light when compared with an f/3.5-5.6 lens. It doesn't have a constant f/2.8 aperture like similar lenses from Canon, Pentax, and Sony, but its $500 price tag is a lot more palatable than those competing optics. If you can live with a shorter zoom, consider the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM as an alternative; its exceptional performance, even at f/1.8, makes it our Editor's Choice, but it comes with an $800 price tag. If you'd prefer a longer zoom and close focus capability, the Sigma 17-70mm is an affordable alternative, and an excellent lens in its own right.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM - Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM Review

4.0 Excellent

The Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM lens is a solid replacement for the 18-55mm that shipped with your camera, but another Sigma zoom is our Editors' Choice.

Get It Now
Best Deal£353.08

Buy It Now

£353.08

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio