PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 - Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Epson Home Cinema 3500 projector, for 2D and 3D, offers a bright image along with features that give you significant flexibility as to where to put the projector relative to the screen.
Best Deal£259.99

Buy It Now

£259.99

Pros & Cons

    • Full 1080p 3D.
    • Works directly with HDMI 1.4a devices like Blu-ray players and cable set-top boxes.
    • Vertical and horizontal lens shift.
    • 1.6x zoom.
    • Minor image-quality issues in particularly demanding scenes.
    • Long lag time.

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 Specs

Engine Type LCD
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Inputs and Interfaces MHL
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 2500
Warranty 24
Weight 14.9

Equal parts home theater and home entertainment projector, the Epson Home Cinema 3500 ($1599.99) delivers both suitable image quality for a home theater and several features—including a bright image that can stand up to ambient light—that make it equally suitable for home entertainment use in, say, a family room. The combination of image quality (for both 2D and 3D), brightness, modest price, and setup conveniences like the 1.6x zoom makes the 3500 ($1,210.98 at Amazon) an easy pick as Editors' Choice.

The 3500 delivers full 1080p HD in 2D and 3D. Its three-chip LCD design distinguishes it from DLP models like the BenQ HT1075 ($892.60 at Amazon) by guaranteeing that it can't show rainbow artifacts (red-green-blue flashes). The LCD engine also ensures that the projector's white brightness and color brightness match, so you don't have to worry about differences between the two potentially affecting color quality. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why It Matters.)

The 1.6x zoom is a welcome convenience for setup, giving you more flexibility than most models for how far you can put the projector from the screen for a given size image. Potentially even more helpful is a significant level of vertical and horizontal lens shift. Lens shift lets you move the image without moving the projector and without turning the rectangular image into a trapezoid. According to Epson, the 3500 can shift images by as much as 60 percent of the screen height up or down from the center position and as much as 24 percent of the width left or right from the center.

My measurements confirmed Epson's claim for the vertical shift, but came in a little lower for the horizontal shift, at 21 percent left or right of the center position. That still gives you lots of freedom for where you can put the projector relative to the screen without needing to adjust the image shape with keystone correction, which can add artifacts.

Setup, Brightness, and Sound

Epson says that the 3500 is designed to fit on a bookshelf, at 6.4 by 16.1 by 12.6 inches (HWD) and 14 pounds 14 ounces. It also offers front ventilation, so there's no need to leave room for air flow in back. However, all the ports are on the back, so you'll need an extra two or three inches of open space behind the projector to make room for cables.

Aside from the advantages of lens shift, setup is standard, with manual focus and zoom. Image input include two HDMI ports, VGA and composite video ports, and a component video port with three RCA connectors. One HDMI port is Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)-enabled, and there's a USB Type A port for reading files from USB memory devices or connecting an optional ($99) Wi-Fi dongle. Both HDMI ports support 3D from video sources like a Blu-ray player or a cable or FiOS box.

Related Story See How We Test Projectors

Based on Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations for theater-dark lighting, and assuming a 1.0 gain screen, the 2,500-lumen rating for the 3500 makes it bright enough for a screen size (measured diagonally) of roughly 195 to 264 inches at 1080p's 16:9 aspect ratio. With moderate ambient light, it's bright enough for a roughly 130- to 145-inch image. For dimmer lighting or more realistic screen sizes for home use, you can adjust the brightness by using Eco mode, a lower-brightness predefined mode, or both.

The two 10-watt speakers deliver excellent audio quality—for a projector at least—with easily enough volume to fill a family room or living room. If you want still better sound quality, or a system with speakers far enough apart to hear a stereo effect, you can easily plug in an external audio system. Also note that the speakers are on the back of projector, which means that if you put the projector on a bookshelf in the back of a room, you'll probably want to use an external sound system in any case.

Performance: 2D, 3D and Lag Time
Image quality for the 3500 is excellent or close to it across the board. With 2D, color quality in my tests was impressive, and the image showed crisp detail. I saw some minor issues, but only in the most demanding test clips, which we use precisely because each one tends to bring out a specific problem. Among these is a hint of posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually) in faces in one badly lit scene and a mild loss of shadow detail in another. However, the projector handled both skin tones and shadow detail without problems otherwise.

For 3D, the 3500 comes with two pairs of Epson's RF glasses. Additional pairs are $99 each, although Epson says you can use any glasses that follow the Full HD RF 3D standard. Image quality is essentially the same as for 2D, with excellent color quality and a level of sharp detail that stands out as unusual for 3D projectors. In addition, I didn't see any crosstalk and saw barely a hint of 3D-related motion artifacts.

The one disappointment is the 3500's lag time performance. Using the projector's default settings, I measured it with a Leo Bodnar Video Input Lag Tester at 116.9 milliseconds (ms), which translates to a 7-frame lag at 60 frames per second. Even with all the settings that could affect lag turned off and with Image Processing set to Fast instead of the default Fine, it still scord a 45.8 ms—or 2.7-frame—lag. As a point of reference, the Optoma HD141X ($379.99 at Amazon) came in at 33 milliseconds.

If you're looking for a projector for game playing, you'll probably prefer one with a shorter lag time, like the Optoma HD141X. For a home theater or as a substitute for a TV in a family room, however, the Epson Home Cinema 3500 offers the advantage of rainbow-free images, excellent color quality, and near-excellent overall image quality for both 2D and 3D. The added conveniences of the 1.6x zoom and lens shift are the proverbial icing on the cake. They turn the 3500 into a compelling pick and our Editors' Choice for a moderately priced home theater and home entertainment projector.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 - Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 3500 Review

4.0 Excellent

The Epson Home Cinema 3500 projector, for 2D and 3D, offers a bright image along with features that give you significant flexibility as to where to put the projector relative to the screen.

Get It Now
Best Deal£259.99

Buy It Now

£259.99

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio