PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ HT1075

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
BenQ HT1075 - BenQ HT1075
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

BenQ's HT1075 home-entertainment projector offers reasonably good video quality, 3D capability, and a brightness level suitable for projecting a large image even with the lights on.
Best Deal£1857.86

Buy It Now

£1857.86

Pros & Cons

    • Full 1080p in 2D and 3D.
    • Two HDMI connectors, one of which is Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)-enabled.
    • Shows some judder and rainbow artifacts in video.

BenQ HT1075 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Inputs and Interfaces MHL
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 2200
Warranty 12
Weight 6.3

The BenQ HT1075 3D home-entertainment projector ($1,099) is most notable for a feature it doesn't yet have at this writing. BenQ plans to offer a Wireless Full HD accessory ($349 list), so you can connect the projector to a video source—even in another room—to show 1080p video without having to string cables. Not having that option available to test makes it impossible to know how well it will work, but even without it, the HT1075 ($892.60 at Amazon) offers enough to make it worth considering.

Aside from being DLP-based, the HT1075 has a lot in common with the LCD-based Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 2030 ($895.00 at Amazon) , which is our Editors' Choice 1080p home-entertainment projector. In addition to full-HD native resolution, both models are similar in their rated brightness, weight, size, and even feature sets. Both, for example, include two HDMI ports, one of which is Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)-enabled, which opens up possibilities like being able to plug in, say, a Roku Stick for streaming TV.

Both are definitively home-entertainment projectors, suitable for supplementing or replacing a TV in a family room, rather than home-theater projectors designed primarily for permanent installation in a room with theater-dark lighting.

A projector in a family room or living room requires a bright image that can stand up to ambient light. Following the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations for theater-dark lighting, the HT1075's rated 2,200 lumens would be bright enough with a 1.0 gain screen for an image size of 183 to 248 (diagonal) inches. In moderate ambient light, it's bright enough for roughly a 120- to 130-inch image.

For smaller screen sizes or dimmer lighting, you can also lower the HT1075's brightness by switching to Eco mode or a lower brightness mode. Keep in mind, however, that as with most DLP projectors—and unlike LCD projectors like the Epson 2030—the HT1075 has lower color brightness than white brightness. I measured the difference at about 20 percent in each of its predefined modes. So although its rated brightness is a little higher than the Epson 2030's rated white brightness, its actual brightness for full-color images is a little lower. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why It Matters.)

One other factor that makes the HT1075 a home-entertainment projector is its built-in sound system. The 10-watt mono speaker delivers suitable quality and enough volume to fill a family room or living room.

Basics and Setup

Like most home-entertainment projectors, including the Epson 2030 and the BenQ W1080ST ($949.46 at Amazon) , the HT1075 is small and light compared with home-theater projectors. It measures 4.1 by 12.2 by 9.6 inches (HWD) and weighs 6.3 pounds. Setup is mostly standard, with a manual focus and 1.3x zoom. One useful extra is a vertical lens shift that can move the image up or down from the center position by about 5 percent of the screen height. The lens shift makes it a little easier to position the projector without having to tilt it up or down, and then having to worry about adjusting the image for keystone distortion.

Connectors for image input on the back panel include two HDMI ports, along with the usual VGA and composite video ports. In addition, there's a component video input, with three RCA-phono plugs. There's also a USB Type A port, but it's strictly for power output. You can connect a cell phone to charge, for example, but you can't read files from a USB memory key.

The MHL-enabled HDMI port makes it easy to connect a compatible phone or tablet to show images. And because both HMDI ports support all of the HDMI 1.4a 3D formats, you can show 3D from video sources like a Blu-ray player or a cable box. Still other ports include both RCA and mini-jack audio-in ports and a mini-jack audio-out for an external sound system. And the optional Wireless Full HD accessory, which BenQ expects to be available by the end of 2014, will add another connection choice. 

2D and 3D Performance

Image quality for the HT1075 was good, but well short of excellent in my tests. The projector handled shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) well, and I saw barely a hint of posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually) in clips that tend to cause that problem. Colors are nicely saturated, and color quality is more than acceptable, although a little dulled down, as is typical for a slightly low contrast ratio.

Related Story See How We Test Projectors

Unfortunately, the projector tends to show judder easily—the jerkiness in movement that's inherent in movies filmed at 24 frames per second. I even saw it in one clip with people simply moving their arms. I also saw some moderately obvious noise, even when I tried turning noise reduction to maximum.

One other potential issue, which the HT1075 shares with most single-chip DLP projectors, is that it shows rainbow artifacts, with light areas breaking up into flashes of red, green, and blue. If you see these flashes easily, as I do, you will definitely detect them with the HT1075. However, they show far less often than with many DLP projectors, so even those who are sensitive to them aren't likely to find them bothersome.

For 3D capability, the HT1075 offers essentially the same strong points as for 2D, with the additional benefit of much less of a tendency to show judder. I saw only the slightest hint of 3D-related motion artifacts, and I didn't see any crosstalk. Note that BenQ doesn't include any DLP-Link glasses with the projector, however, and you need 144Hz, rather than earlier-generation 120Hz, versions. BenQ's glasses are $59 each.

If you insist on a projector that's absolutely free of rainbow artifacts, you'll need to look at three-chip LCD models, like the Editors' Choice Epson 2030. Beyond that, if you want a projector for a small space, you might be better served with the BenQ W1080ST, which offers a short throw lens to give you a big image with the projector close to the screen. If you don't need the short throw, however, and you don't see rainbow artifacts easily, or at least don't find them bothersome, the BenQ HT1075 offers a bright, reasonably good image, with the tantalizing promise of wireless setup, once the Wireless Full HD accessory becomes available later this year.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

BenQ HT1075 - BenQ HT1075

BenQ HT1075 Review

3.5 Good

BenQ's HT1075 home-entertainment projector offers reasonably good video quality, 3D capability, and a brightness level suitable for projecting a large image even with the lights on.

Get It Now
Best Deal£1857.86

Buy It Now

£1857.86

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio