PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM Review

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM is a fine standard angle zoom with a fixed f/2.8 aperture throughout its range, but it's a little pricey. - Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM is a fine standard angle zoom with a fixed f/2.8 aperture throughout its range, but it's a little pricey.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Sharp throughout zoom range.
    • Fixed f/2.8 aperture.
    • 3.1x zoom range.
    • Lots of distortion at 16mm.
    • Edges could be sharper.
    • Pricey.

Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 75 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 24
Dimensions 3.5 by 3.2 inches
Lens Mount Sony A
Optical Zoom 3.1 x
Type Lens
Weight 1.6

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM ($799.99) may be available as a kit lens with the Sony Alpha 77 II ($1,198.00 at Amazon) camera, but its fixed f/2.8 aperture and wide-angle field of view separate it from more common lenses like the DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II ($79.99 at Amazon) . It's pretty sharp throughout its zoom range, but it doesn't quite measure up to some others that are available for the Sony system, notably the Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM and our Editors' Choice, the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM ($598.00 at Amazon) .

The lens is fairly large, measuring in at 3.5 by 3.2 inches (HD). It weighs 1.3 pounds, uses 72mm front filters, and includes a reversible lens hood. It covers a field of view which matches that of a 24-75mm lens on a full-frame camera, and its maximum aperture is a constant f/2.8 throughout that range. It can focus as close as 12 inches, which translates to a maximum 1:5 magnification ratio. That puts it a bit behind the Sigma 17-70mm ($322.18 at Amazon) , which can capture images with 1:3 life size magnification.

Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM : Sample Image

There aren't a lot of controls on the lens, just a manual zoom ring and a manual focus ring, both with ridged rubber finishes. A locking switch can keep the lens from zooming, which will prevent the barrel from drifting during transport or when the camera is hanging from your neck or at your side. There's no optical stabilization built into the lens; Sony includes stabilization in its camera bodies instead.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness and distortion characteristics of the lens when paired with the 24-megapixel Alpha 77 II. At 16mm f/2.8 the lens records 2,377 lines per picture height, a better score than the 1,800 lines per picture height that we use to mark an image as sharp. Our testing methodology uses a center-weights scoring method, but we do look at how the lens performs at its edges as well. Imatest shows a 1,719-line edge score at 16mm f/2.8, which is pretty good. There's some improvement at f/4 (2,623 lines), at f/5.6 (2,689 lines), and at f/8 (2,706 lines). If you want to stop down, they improve to 1,815 lines at f/5.6 and 1,940 lines at f/8.

Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM : Sample Image

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

At 24mm the sharpness is about the same; the lens shows 2,289 lines at f/2.8 and improves to 2,657 lines at f/4. Edges are a little soft (1,735 lines) at f/2.8, but are tack sharp (2,247 lines) at f/4. At 35mm the overall sharpness is still good at f/2.8 (2,123 lines), but quality at the edges drops off quickly (1,405 lines). Stopping down to f/4 bumps the overall sharpness to 2,640 lines, and edges jump to 1,792 lines.

At the maximum zoom (50mm) the lens is again sharp in the center, which gives it a center-weighted score of 2,055 lines, but edges hover around 1,000 lines and the area of the frame between the center and outer edges is also a bit soft (1,656 lines). The lens is a lot better at f/4, with a 2,552-line center-weighted score that carries throughout the frame. Edges are still an issue, showing just 1,393 lines, and even at f/5.6 they only improve to 1,676 lines. Distortion is a nonissue through most of the zoom range, but at 16mm there's quite a bit—about 2.7 percent barrel distortion. That makes straight lines appear to curve outward, but it can be corrected via software. Lightroom includes a lens profile that will compensate for distortion with a single click.

Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM : Sample Image

Despite some issues with edge performance when zoomed in and distortion at the wide end, the Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM represents a significant upgrade over the more pedestrian 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom that is bundled with entry-level Sony SLRs. At $800 it's on the pricey side, especially when you can get the Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM, a lens that covers a longer zoom range and can focus at closer distances, for $500. Our Editors' Choice zoom, the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM, doesn't cover as much of a range, but it's impeccably sharp and captures more than twice the light as the Sony 16-50mm, for the same asking price.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM is a fine standard angle zoom with a fixed f/2.8 aperture throughout its range, but it's a little pricey. - Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM

Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM Review

3.5 Good

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM is a fine standard angle zoom with a fixed f/2.8 aperture throughout its range, but it's a little pricey.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio