PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II - Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II is better than the older version of the lens, but it still suffers compared with other 18-55mm kit zooms.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Sharp at widest angle.
    • Light.
    • Compact.
    • Internal focus motor.
    • Front element rotates during focus.
    • Sharpness suffers as you zoom.
    • Edges are never that sharp.
    • Plastic lens mount.

Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II Specs

Type Lens

The Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II ($219.99 direct) is the standard kit lens that ships with Sony D-SLR cameras. It replaces the older DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM( at Amazon) lens, which was not a good performer, and does offer some improvements. It's still not as good as other low-cost 18-55mm lenses, and can't touch our Editors' Choice Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM($598.00 at Amazon), a more expensive lens that gathers much more light and is extremely sharp throughout its range.

The SAM II($79.99 at Amazon) measures 2.7 by 2.8 inches (HD) and weighs in at 7.8 ounces. The front element accepts 55mm filters, but it rotates while focusing. This makes it difficult to use a polarizing filter, which requires you to rotate it properly to remove reflections from your photos. It's compatible with Sony cameras with APS-C image sensors (although it could be used on a full-frame body in crop mode if you really wanted to) and covers a field of view that matches 27-83mm on a full-frame camera. The lens mount is plastic, a less durable design than more expensive lenses with metal mounts. There is an internal focus motor, which is quick to adjust focus and quieter than older screw-drive systems. The lens lacks image stabilization, but that isn't an issue as Sony cameras have shake reduction built into the body.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness and distortion characteristics of the lens when paired with the Alpha 58($369.99 at Amazon) D-SLR. It's sharpest at its widest angle; at 18mm f/3.5 it notches 1,912 lines per picture height using a center-weighted testing method; that's better than the 1,800 lines we require to call a photo sharp. Edges are just a little soft at 1,604 lines. Barrel distortion is noticeable here, there's about 3.7 percent, which causes straight lines to noticeably curve outward.

Zooming into 35mm narrows the maximum aperture to f/4.5, but performance suffers. It only manages 1,612 lines here, and edges are very fuzzy at 1,117 lines. Stopping down to f/5.6 improves the overall score to 1,939 lines with edges that near 1,500 lines. The best performance is at f/8, with a center-weighted score of 2,073 lines with edges that near 1,600 lines. Distortion is negligible here. At 55mm the maximum aperture is f/5.6, and the lens manages 1,605 lines with edges that hover around 1,450 lines. Stopping down to f/8 brings up the overall image quality to 1,898 lines with edges that near 1,700 lines. Again, distortion isn't an issue here. Both the Nikon 18-55mm($74.99 at Amazon) and Canon 18-55mm($96.18 at Amazon) are sharper, and show a less distortion at the wide end.

There are better lenses available for your Sony D-SLR; but they're more expensive. The  Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 covers a similar range, but does it at a fixed f/2.8 aperture and is very sharp throughout its zoom range. It also shows distortion at its widest angle, but that can be fixed with software. But it's priced at $800, and for that money you are much, much better off with the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 lens. Its zoom range isn't as long, but it captures an incredible amount of light and delivers image quality that's on par with prime lenses.

If you're after a longer zoom range, and don't want to spend a ton of money on a lens, consider the Sony 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6($498.00 at Amazon). It's priced around $500, but can be had for less when bundled with a new body, and is a solid performer. You're not likely to buy the 18-55mm SAM II on its own; most shooters will get it as a kit lens. It's not the best of that type that we've looked at, but it does deliver decent performance if you narrow its aperture a bit. It's definitely an improvement over the original 18-55mm SAM lens, but it's not as good as Sony's more expensive 18-135mm kit zoom, and can't touch the Sigma 18-35mm.

Best Camera Picks

Camera Product Comparisons

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II - Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II

Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II Review

3.0 Average

The Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM II is better than the older version of the lens, but it still suffers compared with other 18-55mm kit zooms.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio