PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Nikon Plena Lens Promises Beautiful Bokeh for Portraits

The Nikkor Z 135mm F1.8 S Plena matches a wide aperture and telephoto focal length for extreme background blur

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Nikon is excited about its latest lens, the Nikkor Z 135mm F1.8 S, even more so than usual. It's gone as far as to give the lens a name, Plena. It's the second named Z lens, following the 58mm F0.95 S Noct, an $8,000 lens that is more about what Nikon's engineers could do with an unlimited budget, and less so a practical tool for mere mortals.

The Plena is a more approachable lens; it costs about a third of the Noct, and includes autofocus, so we expect more photographers to actually own one. Its focal length and aperture make it an especially good pick for portrait work, or any photo where you want to place your subject against a blurred, defocused background.


Exotic Optics for Rounded Bokeh

The 135mm F1.8 isn't a unique concept, Canon and Sony both sell a version for their respective mirrorless systems. Nikon is touting a couple aspects of the Plena as difference makers versus the competition. Its 16-element/14-group optical formula uses a single aspherical element, which makes for rounder bokeh highlights toward the edges of the picture at f/1.8. Both the Canon RF 135mm F1.8 IS L USM and Sony FE 135mm F1.8 GM exhibit the cat's eye effect toward the periphery.

For stopped-down work, an 11-blade aperture maintains rounded highlights at smaller f-stops. Nikon also touts a minimal vignette as an advantage, though lens correction profiles make that more of a bragging point than practical concern for most photos.

Autofocus is a practical addition that's not included in the Noct; the Plena's STM motors work with eye detection and tracking features included in Z mirrorless cameras, so you should be able to get perfectly focused eyes, even if your model is moving. Stabilization isn't included, however, so Nikon photogs will need to be more mindful of shutter speeds than with Canon's stabilized RF 135mm.

Construction looks sturdy too. The Plena includes dust and drip protection and a metal barrel with an engraved logo. It's a classy looking lens. It's fairly heavy for its 3.9-by-5.5-inch barrel, 2.2 pounds, but still roughly half of the famously heavy Noct.


Pricing and Availability

The Nikkor Z 135mm F1.8 S Plena goes on sale in mid-October for $2,499.95. It's a bargain compared with the $8,000 Nikkor Noct, but costs a bit more than the Canon 135mm ($2,099) or Sony 135mm GM ($2,199). We'll report back after we've tested the Plena to see if it's worth the slight premium, or lofty marketing for that matter.

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio