PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Polaroid Insta-Share Printer

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Polaroid Insta-Share Printer attaches to compatible Motorola phones so you can share physical pictures wherever you go, but its print quality leaves a lot to be desired. - Polaroid Insta-Share Printer
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

The Polaroid Insta-Share Printer attaches to compatible Motorola phones so you can share physical pictures wherever you go, but its print quality leaves a lot to be desired.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Low print cost.
    • Photos are stickers.
    • Must be charged separately from phone.
    • So-so print quality.
    • Frustrating app.
    • Short battery life.
    • Bulky.

The Polaroid Insta-Share Printer ($199.99) is another in the Moto Mod lineup, a series of accessories that snap onto your phone to add functionality it isn't capable of on its own. But, despite the novelty factor, it's not one of the better Mods available. Print quality is so-so, with poor color fidelity and limited saturation, and the app that drives the printer has some pain points. If you want a photo printer for your phone, get the Fujifilm Instax Share SP-2 or SP-3 instead.

Design

Like all Moto Mods, the Insta-Share Printer snaps onto the back of your Moto Z series phone magnetically. It's finished in white plastic, so it creates a clashing two-tone look when paired with a compatible phone—current models are only available with a black finish. It also adds a bit of bulk.

The printer measures 6.1 by 2.9 by 0.8 inches (HWD) and weighs 6.6 ounces, and you certainly feel it when you're holding the phone. The size also makes it a bit much to fit into tighter pockets. It's not a complete brick, as the top portion is narrower, and includes a circular cutout so you can use your phone's camera with the printer attached. The slot from which prints eject is right underneath the cutout.

Polaroid Insta-Share Printer : AppThe Insta-Share uses heat-sensitive paper to make prints without the need for ink or chemicals. The first time you attach the printer it gives you some on-screen instructions on loading paper, a plus if you haven't used this type of printer before. The 3-by-2-inch (HW) prints are borderless, with a glossy, water-resistant finish and a peel-away back turns them into stickers. Paper is sold by Polaroid under the Zink brand, and can be had in a 20-pack for about $7.50—$0.38 per print.

The printer has its own battery and charging port. But the USB-C port is covered when it's attached to the phone, so you'll need to take it off and charge it separately. Pass-through charging from phone to printer is not supported. Battery life is also a concern. The printer is only rated to stay charged long enough to make 20 prints—that's more than you'll probably make in one sitting, but it does mean you'll have to be mindful to keep it charged when you want to use it. The square-format Fuji SP-3 ($134.00 at Amazon) , which works with phones via a Wi-Fi connection, can make 160 prints on a single charge.

App and Print Quality

The printer has its own app that downloads automatically from the Google Play store when you first attach it to your phone. The app is pretty straightforward—you'll need to give it access to your camera and photo library, and if you want to pull photos from Facebook, Google Drive, or Instagram, you'll need to log into those services via the app as well.

Polaroid Insta-Share Printer : AppPrinting an image without editing should be a simple task. But it's not. I downloaded a few test images to the phone and was surprised to see that, when loaded to print, the images were automatically zoomed in. This happened not only on photos where I'd expect the app to do so—images in a ratio other than 3:2, where zooming is necessary to fill the print, for example—but also when images were the proper aspect ratio for borderless printing to Zink paper.

No problem, just need to pinch and zoom out a bit, right? Unfortunately, no. Pinching does indeed zoom out, but it also acts as a free rotation tool. The two actions are tied together, so I had to do some digital gymnastics in order to pull out far enough to print all of my photo, while at the same time keeping things as straight as they were in the original shot.

Polaroid Insta-Share Printer : AppThere were a few other issues with the app. I made six test prints, but even with that low volume I dealt with two app crashes when setting them up. I also noticed that images in my Instagram feed appeared twice in a row as I scrolled through, when I knew that I had not double posted photos.

Once you get past the cropping interface and crashes, you'll find the app has some very basic image editing tools. You can apply filters, add stickers or text, and add borders to photos. But you don't get any sort of advanced layout tools like you do with Fuji's app for its Instax Share printers. That means no large-scale collages made up of dozens of smaller prints, and no way in the app to include more than one photo on a single print.

Polaroid Insta-Share Printer : Print Quality

And then there's the print quality. I've never been impressed with Zink, and the Insta-Share does nothing to change my opinion. Prints don't show the same color saturation as a photo contains, colors aren't always accurate, and streaky dithering is visible, especially so in areas where color is uniform, like defocused backgrounds or bright, open skies. Instax film, which is used by competing Fujifilm printers, delivers much truer results, although it does come at a higher cost—the Mini format, about the same size as Zink, is around $0.70 per image, and the larger Instax Square format is about $1.50 per image. But I'd rather pay more for a quality print than spend anything on a disappointing one.

Conclusions

At $200, the Insta-Share doesn't offer any sort of up-front cost advantage when compared with competing wireless instant film printers from Fujifilm. You can get the SP-2 for less than its $179.95 asking price and spend a little bit more money per print. Quality is better, and the 1.8-by-2.4-inch images aren't far off from the Zink format in size. If you don't mind spending a bit more on prints, the $200 Fuji SP-3 uses the 2.4-inch Instax Square format, and can work with any Android or iOS phone—you won't be forced to abandon it if you opt for something other than a Moto Z handset when it's time to upgrade. If the Zink paper format delivered better results we'd recommend the printer to Moto Z users, but it doesn't. You're better off skipping this Mod and looking elsewhere for on-the-go photo printing, or just going old-school and getting an instant camera.

Best Mobile Phone Accessory Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

The Polaroid Insta-Share Printer attaches to compatible Motorola phones so you can share physical pictures wherever you go, but its print quality leaves a lot to be desired. - Polaroid Insta-Share Printer

Polaroid Insta-Share Printer

2.5 Fair

The Polaroid Insta-Share Printer attaches to compatible Motorola phones so you can share physical pictures wherever you go, but its print quality leaves a lot to be desired.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio