PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector - Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

Tipping the scales at just 1.2 pounds, the Kodak Luma 450 is one of the smallest and lightest projectors available with 1080p resolution.
Best Deal£449.99

Buy It Now

£449.99

Pros & Cons

    • Lightweight
    • Full HD (1080p) native resolution
    • Android OS 9 for streaming, Wi-Fi, and screen mirroring
    • Battery rated at up to 2.5 hours per charge in Eco mode
    • No controls for adjusting image quality, even for brightness and contrast
    • Only one picture mode
    • Image is slightly oversharpened
    • Requires a network connection to mirror mobile devices
    • Hard to adjust for best focus

Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector Specs

Dimensions (HWD) 1.3 by 5 by 5 inches
Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI 2.2
Maximum Resolution 3840 by 2160 @ 30Hz
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 200
Warranty 1
Weight 1.2

At $549.99, the Kodak Luma 450 is the flagship model in Kodak's Luma line, a set of similar-looking projectors that includes the Luma 75, our Editors' Choice pick for a pocket projector, and the Luma 350, our top pick among 854-by-480-pixel palmtops. All the Luma models share the same flat, rectangular palmtop shape, differing primarily in size and features. The 450 is tied for biggest in the group, while still being small enough to sit comfortably on a palm, and it offers the highest native resolution. It doesn't earn an Editors' Choice slot, but it delivers more than enough to be worth considering. At 1.2 pounds, it's the smallest, lightest 1080p projector we've seen to date.


Small, Light, and Packed With Features

Size, of course, is a relative term. The Luma 450 is a lot bigger than the Luma 75, for example, but it's also small enough to fit in a coat pocket, at 1.3 by 5 by 5 inches (HWD). Like most small projectors than can be battery-powered, it's built around an LED light source and a diamond-array DLP chip, which offers a lower power draw compared with TI's rectangular chips to increase battery life. For the Luma 450, the rated runtime on a charge (along with the image brightness) varies with the three power modes, at 1.5 hours for High power mode, 2 hours for Normal, and 2.5 hours for Eco.

The diamond-array chip can also introduce artifacts to the projected image, but these show up only in images with small, repeating patterns. They can be a potential problem for presentations that use patterned fills, but they're not much of an issue for other graphics, or for watching film and video.

As with many projectors today (though uncommon among palmtops), the Luma 450 includes built-in streaming, using Android OS 9 in this case as opposed to Android TV. Wi-Fi is the only connection choice to your internet-connected network. After you've completed the initial setup routine, you'll find apps for a number of popular streaming sites installed (including Netflix, YouTube, and Hulu), as well as an app for downloading more. Note, though, that at least the ones I tested require installing Kodak's Luma app on your phone or tablet, and connecting the mobile device to the same network as the projector, to actually use them.

Kodak Luma 450 projector (on tripod)

Physical setup requires no more than (optionally) connecting to AC power and an image source, turning the power on, manually focusing, and adjusting the image size by moving the projector. The unit also features digital zoom and keystone features for that, but as with any projector, these are best ignored, since they lower brightness and can add artifacts.

Kodak also includes a table-top tripod in the box, which helps make it easy to aim at whatever you're using as a screen. In addition to streaming through a Wi-Fi connection, the Luma 450 offers an HDMI port and a USB Type-A port for reading files from USB memory or powering an HDMI streaming dongle. It also supports screen mirroring for iOS and Android devices connected to the same network.

Kodak Luma 450 (rear panel)

The onboard set of two 1-watt speakers is suitable for use in a small, quiet room. For higher volume or better audio quality, you can use Bluetooth or the 3.5mm audio-out to connect headphones or an external sound system.


Image Quality: Good Enough for Presentations, Home Entertainment

Image quality for both business presentations and home entertainment is best described as good enough to be useful, which is about as much as you can expect from any projector in this category. The Luma 450 offers only a single picture mode, and no controls for adjusting even such basic settings as brightness, contrast, and sharpening.

A sharpening control would be at the top of my wish list, since the locked-in setting was a touch over-sharpened. This was mostly an issue for small text that you might want to use in a presentation, since it resulted in ringing that made small fonts hard to read. But it also showed in fine detail in photorealistic images. In closeups of faces, for example, it tended to enhance small blemishes and pores.

The sharpening was less obvious in videos and film, since any movement of the image helped hide the effect. But the combination of the over-sharpening and a thumbwheel focus control that's hard to adjust for the best focus left the resolution, in the sense of ability to resolve detail, a bit below what 1080p promises.

Kodak Luma 450 (top, front, and left side)

Some colors in both business graphics and movies were off by enough to be obvious, with skin tones in our test suite showing a yellow bias in many cases. Also, some colors in photorealistic images were so oversaturated that they wandered a bit outside of a realistic range. However, that's not unusual for LED-based projectors, and forgivable for a palmtop. Some people even prefer oversaturated color. Some images also lost significant shadow in my viewing tests with movies and video, but enough held even in dark scenes to be able to make out what was happening in the shadows.

Note that there is no support for 3D, and input lag is too long for gamers. I measured the latter with a Leo Bodnar meter at 165ms for a 1080p, 60Hz input.

Kodak rates the projector at 200 ANSI lumens for the brightest mode. Don't compare that to the higher LED lumens that some competing projectors claim. (ANSI lumens are a standard, while LED lumens are not.) More important, the Luma 450's image was as bright as I expect from the rating. According to the Society for Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations, depending on how bright an image you prefer, 200 lumens is suitable in a dark room for long sessions to light up a 55- to 74-inch diagonal, 16:9, 1.0-gain screen. I tend to prefer the brighter end of the range, and in my tests, I settled on using a 56-inch image. (See our guide to choosing the right projector screen.)


The Verdict: A Tempting Lightweight Projector

If you want as light a projector as possible and a resolution that will show more detail on screen than models with 720p or lower resolutions, the Kodak Luma 450 is a strong contender. The AAXA M7 comes closer to delivering on the promise of its native 1080p spec, but without onboard streaming, and at about two-and-a-half times the weight.

On the other hand, if you don't mind a lower resolution, the 720p Kodak Luma 400 offers similar features to the 450 for lower cost, while the 854-by-480-pixel Luma 350, our top pick for its size and resolution, offers similar features, as well, at a still lower price. That said, if you need a projector with a built-in battery, a weight of little more than a pound, and the highest resolution for that weight, the 450 is the Luma projector you want.

Final Thoughts

Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector - Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector

Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector

3.5 Good

Tipping the scales at just 1.2 pounds, the Kodak Luma 450 is one of the smallest and lightest projectors available with 1080p resolution.

Get It Now
Best Deal£449.99

Buy It Now

£449.99

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio