PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ TH685

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
BenQ TH685 - BenQ TH685
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The BenQ TH685 is a solid 1080p choice for gaming or for viewing movies or video even in a room with ambient light. The package of good color accuracy and contrast, fast input lag, high brightness, and support for HLG and 4K input is especially appealing at this affordable price.
Best Deal£729

Buy It Now

£729

Pros & Cons

    • Good color accuracy and contrast for the price
    • Supports HDR, including HLG
    • Accepts 4K input to downconvert to 1080p
    • Low input lag for gaming
    • Supports Full HD 3D
    • Hard to adjust for sharpest image
    • Doesn't read files from USB memory keys

BenQ TH685 Specs

Dimensions (HWD) 4 by 12 by 9 inches
Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI (MHL)
Inputs and Interfaces RGB Passthrough
Inputs and Interfaces VGA/Component
Maximum Resolution 1920 by 1200
Native Resolution 1920 by 1080
Rated Brightness 3500
Warranty 3
Weight 6.2

The BenQ TH685 ($799) is one of a growing number of 1080p projectors that can accept 4K (3820-by-2160) HDR input, downconvert the image to show at 1080p resolution, keep the HDR, and deliver a bright, highly watchable picture. Like other projectors in this category, including the Optoma GT1080HDR  and Optoma HD39HDR, it supports HDR10, found on UHD Blu-ray discs and other recorded material. Unlike many, it also supports HLG, the emerging standard for broadcast TV. For both HDR and SDR (standard dynamic range) content, it delivers good color accuracy and contrast, especially given its relatively low price. And at a rated 3,500 lumens, it's easily bright enough to deliver a satisfyingly big picture in ambient light. 


Built for Both Brightness and Color

The TH685 pairs a single 1920-by-1200 DLP chip with a six-segment, RGBWYC (red-green-blue-white-yellow-cyan) color wheel, but uses only 1920-by-1080 pixels on the chip as its native resolution. The extra pixels let you shift the picture up or down from the center position by 5 percent of the image height, as a convenient way to position the image for your screen.

The color wheel's white segment lets it deliver a brighter image than you would get from an otherwise identical projector without one. However, it also affects color accuracy, which is why color wheels in projectors meant for traditional home theater in a dark room—such as the BenQ HT2150ST—don't include white panels. The yellow and cyan segments help correct for that, with the yellow segment helping deliver brighter, more vibrant yellows than many DLP projectors can manage. 

BenQ TH685 top
Adjusting the TH685 for the sharpest picture can be tricky.

Setup and Viewing

At 6.2 pounds and 4 by 12 by 9 inches (HWD), the TH685 is easy to handle for setup. The digital image shift and 1.3x zoom lens also add flexibility for positioning. And if you need to tilt the projector up or down even after adjusting the shift, you can square off the image with the +/- 30 degree vertical keystone control.

I set up the projector for a 90-inch image at 7 feet, 3 inches from the screen. One small annoyance is that it's harder than it should be to get the image well focused. Moving the focus ring just a little changes the focus a lot, making it hard to adjust without overshooting the right setting.

Image inputs include two HDMI 2.0b ports, which both support HDCP 2.2 (the copy protection version on 4K Blu-ray discs). There's also a USB port, meant strictly for supplying power to HDMI dongles. 

BenQ TH685 back ports
The back panel hosts various ports for input and power.

Even with default settings, image quality is good for the price, and easily rates as more than acceptable by most standards. Once you get the focus right, image detail is appropriate for the 1080p resolution, and colors for movies and video are well within the range for realistic color in all but one of the predefined color modes. As with most projectors, Bright mode sacrifices color accuracy for visibility in a setting with lots of ambient light, such as in a family room with lots of sunny windows. But you'll probably find the slight green shift tolerable if you only need to use Bright mode occasionally.

For SDR content, Cinema mode has the best color accuracy and is the one I chose for most of my testing. But Living Room, Standard, and Game modes were not far behind. Sports mode isn't as good, but its color was rarely outside of a realistic range in my tests, and only slightly off when it was. The four modes with better color accuracy were all closely matched on contrast, black levels, and sense of three-dimensionality in dark scenes. Living Room and Game modes both brightened up shadow detail just a little. This can steal visual impact from dark scenes in movies, but can help gamers spot what's happening in dark areas more quickly. All these modes did a good job of showing the subtle gradations that make close-ups of rounded objects, such as faces, look three-dimensional. 

BenQ TH685 front and top
For a small and relatively inexpensive 1080p projector, the TH685 produces impressive color accuracy.

For HDR testing, I used 4K discs only, since HLG content is still more of a promise than a reality at this writing. But, according to BenQ, both modes work essentially the same way. In my tests, the TH685 switched to its single HDR10 mode and automatically downconverted the 4K image to the projector's native 1080p. As with most HDR projectors, the TH685 offers what's usually called an HDR brightness setting for manual adjustment. The best setting will vary with the ambient light level as well as from movie to movie.

See How We Test ProjectorsSee How We Test Projectors

In my tests with 4K HDR movies, brightly lit scenes had nicely saturated color and good contrast. Dark scenes were similar enough to the SDR versions of the same movies that—with no way to do a side-by-side comparison—differences were hard to pinpoint. My impression is that they offered the same shadow detail as in SDR, but with darker gray levels to yield a more dramatic image and greater sense of dimensionality. 

Like most of its direct competitors, the TH685 has several settings for fine-tuning the image range: general brightness, contrast, and gamma adjustments, plus a color management system for adjusting hue, saturation, and gain separately for each primary and secondary color. 

The rated 3,500 lumens is bright enough, according to the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendations, to light up a 270-inch diagonal screen in a dark room or a 150-inch screen in moderate ambient light, assuming a 1.0-gain, 16:9 white screen. As with most projectors, however, the modes you're most likely to use don't project at full brightness. For my formal tests in a dark room, Cinema mode was bright enough to fill a 90-inch-diagonal white screen. In informal tests in a family room with lots of windows, it was still bright enough to light up an 80-inch 1.0-gain white screen for nighttime viewing with lights on or for daytime viewing on a rainy day. 

As is typical in this price range, the TH685 offers a single 3D picture mode and works with DLP-link glasses only. I saw no crosstalk or ghosting in my tests, and only minor 3D-related motion artifacts. 

The TH685 gets mixed reviews for rainbow artifacts. I saw these red-green-blue flashes often enough to notice, but they were fleeting, so if you're not sensitive to them, you may not see them at all. As with any single-chip projector, if you see these artifacts easily—or don't know whether you do—buy the projector from a source that allows returns without a restocking fee, in case the artifacts do end up bothering you.


Light and Fast With Good Sound

Gamers will appreciate the TH685's fast lag time. With Fast mode on—the default setting for Game picture mode—my Bodnar meter measured the lag for 1080p, 60Hz input at 16.4 ms. BenQ doesn't include a carrying case, but the projector is still quite portable; gamers who need a projector they can easily carry from room to room or to a friend's house will appreciate the small size and light weight.

BenQ TH685
The TH685 is small, light, and easy to carry.

As a pleasant surprise, it also delivers far more robust audio than you would expect from its onboard 5-watt mono speaker, thanks to the chamber design. Audio quality is good for such a small projector, and the volume is high enough to fill a large family room. For stereo or truly high quality, however, plan on using an external sound system. 


A Top Contender

If you're on a tight budget, you might want to consider less expensive 1080p projectors. The ViewSonic PX701HD ($590) and BenQ's own TH585 ($599), for example, are also designed for gaming and for watching movies and video in ambient light. But they leave out support for HDR and 4K input.

Two other choices that are more directly competitive and worth a close look are the Optoma HD39HDR and Optoma GT1080HDR. Both share the TH685's ability to accept 4K HDR input and downconvert it to 1080p HDR, and both offer somewhat higher brightness ratings. However, the TH685 is the only one of the three that also supports HLG, which gives it an important edge.

Our tests found little to complain about, and perks such as the good onboard audio sweeten the deal. If you want HDR and HLG support in a sub-$1,000 1080p projector, the BenQ TH685 is the one to beat. 

Final Thoughts

BenQ TH685 - BenQ TH685

BenQ TH685

4.0 Excellent

The BenQ TH685 is a solid 1080p choice for gaming or for viewing movies or video even in a room with ambient light. The package of good color accuracy and contrast, fast input lag, high brightness, and support for HLG and 4K input is especially appealing at this affordable price.

Get It Now
Best Deal£729

Buy It Now

£729

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio