PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Verizon's Phone Locking Push Draws Fire Over Cellular Starlink Restriction

Some consumers are slamming Verizon's push to lock carrier-sold phones beyond 60 days, noting it'll block their access to rival T-Mobile's cellular Starlink service.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Verizon is facing backlash over its efforts to keep phones locked, with some consumers pointing out the restriction threatens to block their access to rival T-Mobile’s cellular Starlink service. 

“Permanent locks would make it harder for consumers to switch carriers, use dual-SIM features, or take advantage of emerging services like SpaceX’s Starlink Cellular,” one consumer told the US Federal Communications Commission this week. 

Consumers are filing the complaints after Verizon asked the FCC for a waiver to let it keep carrier-sold phones locked beyond 60 days. Under its current FCC agreement, Verizon can only lock a phone to its network for two months. But the company now claims the restriction isn’t enough to stop fraudsters from buying subsidized Verizon phones only to unlock and resell them

“Verizon estimates that it lost 784,703 devices to fraud in 2023, costing it hundreds of millions of dollars annually,” the company told the FCC in May while noting other carriers, such as AT&T and T-Mobile, face no such restriction. (Verizon faces the 60-day limit as part of a 2008 deal to license 700MHz spectrum as well as acquire Tracfone in 2020.)

Locking phones means they only work on Verizon’s network. The carrier has suggested it wants to do so for six months or longer. In response, the commission is soliciting public comment on the proposal, which caused some consumers to criticize Verizon's effort.

Interestingly, some of the comments cite T-Mobile’s cellular Starlink service as a reason for the FCC to deny Verizon’s waiver. That’s because the T-Mobile satellite service is designed to work for customers on its own network and those on rival carriers, including Verizon and AT&T. 

(Credit: PCMag/Michael Kan)

To do so, T-Mobile has been issuing access to the cellular Starlink service through a secondary eSIM, which can work alongside a phone’s main SIM card. The phone can then switch to Starlink's mobile satellite network once you enter a cellular dead zone. T-Mobile plans on officially launching the T-Satellite service on July 23, selling it for $10 per month for most users. However, Verizon’s phone locking push would presumably shut down an affected handset’s ability to access an eSIM from another carrier.

It’s why some consumers are urging the FCC to deny Verizon’s request for a waiver. “Dual-SIM adds public safety by allowing people to use two networks, including Satellite networks like SpaceX's Starlink on T-Mobile, which will have an a la carte plan soon,” wrote one consumer.

This comes after some users took to Reddit, urging the public to push back on Verizon’s effort to lock phones beyond 60 days. Even T-Mobile users joined in, fearing all carriers might pursue longer phone-locking policies if the FCC grants the waiver.

Last year, the Democratic-led FCC pushed to require all cellular providers “to unlock customers’ mobile phones within 60 days of activation.” But whether the FCC, under new chairman Brendan Carr, will continue pursuing the rule remains unclear, although he voted in support of the initial inquiry.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio