PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

AT&T, Verizon Tell FCC to Reject SpaceX Plan for Cellular Starlink

The carriers tell the FCC that a SpaceX proposal to ensure robust coverage for its cellular Starlink system risks causing interference with their own networks.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Credit: CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images)

A SpaceX proposal to ensure its cellular Starlink system offers robust coverage to users is facing opposition from AT&T and Verizon over concerns it’ll cause interference on their networks. 

"Specifically, AT&T’s technical analysis shows that SpaceX’s proposal would cause an 18% average reduction in network downlink throughput,” the carrier claims

This week, AT&T and Verizon sent letters to the FCC urging the agency to reject SpaceX’s plan for its cellular Starlink system. The pushback risks restricting SpaceX's work on a fleet of satellites capable of beaming internet data to phones on the ground through radio signals.

To improve the technology, SpaceX in June requested a waiver from the FCC that would allow its cellular Starlink satellites to operate beyond normal radio frequency parameters, or what’s known as the “aggregate out-of-band emissions power flux-density limits.”

Despite the increase in radio emissions, SpaceX says its technology would still prevent interference with other networks while ensuring that “consumers and first responders can use an increasingly robust set of features even in the most challenging circumstances.”

“Moreover, waiving the rule would avoid placing artificial caps on the number of satellites that an operator may use to provide supplemental coverage, which in turn would limit the number of end users that the network could benefit,” the company told the FCC in June.

In February, the company also supplied its own study downplaying the interference concerns. Still, AT&T and Verizon are urging the FCC to reject SpaceX’s waiver request, citing their own analyses, which show the interference risk is real.

(Credit: AT&T/FCC)

“Here, SpaceX has not shown good cause to grant its Waiver Request, as its proposed ninefold increase to the allowable SCS OOBE PFD limit would cause unacceptable harmful interference to incumbent terrestrial mobile operations,” AT&T said. 

Meanwhile, Verizon told the FCC: “SpaceX’s proposal would undermine the Commission’s core goal of protecting incumbent terrestrial licensee operations from SCS satellite operations in adjacent bands by subjecting them to harmful interference.”

AT&T and Verizon submitted the comments to the FCC as both carriers are prepping their own cellular satellite systems through Texas startup AST SpaceMobile. Although AST SpaceMobile is looking to start a beta test with AT&T and Verizon customers by December, the company still needs to stage additional satellite launches over many more months before offering “continuous” coverage across the US. 

In contrast, SpaceX has already launched over 100 satellites for the cellular Starlink system and plans to launch the service with T-Mobile later this fall. Still, SpaceX needs to secure approval from the FCC before it can commercially offer the service to customers.

In the meantime, other rival companies, including Dish Network and Omnispace, have also lodged complaints with the FCC about the interference concerns. However, SpaceX is calling on the Commission to dismiss the objections as stalling tactics.

"Indeed, each time that SpaceX has demonstrated that it would not cause harmful interference to other operators—often based on those parties’ own claimed assumptions—those competitors have moved the goalposts or have claimed their analysis should not have been trusted in the first place," SpaceX told the FCC this week. "These operators’ shapeshifting arguments and demands should be seen for what they are: last-minute attempts to block a more advanced supplemental coverage partnership and siphon sensitive information to aid their own competing efforts."

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio