PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

SpaceX Pokes Holes in Cellular Starlink Interference Claims

The company alleges that rival Omnispace merely configured a satellite to detect radio activity from Starlink satellites, instead of actually experiencing interference.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images)

SpaceX is pushing back against accusations that the company’s cellular Starlink system for phones could interfere with other satellites. 

According to SpaceX, rival Omnispace is using rigged testing that fails to provide any evidence of harmful radio interference. It "only proves that SpaceX’s direct-to-cell satellites were operating at the time of Omnispace’s tests and detectable under the narrow conditions of those tests, not that SpaceX’s emissions are causing or would cause harmful interference to Omnispace,” the company told the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday.  

The company sent the letter to the FCC after Omnispace claimed it had uncovered “empirical evidence” demonstrating the interference risks from SpaceX’s ongoing tests with its growing fleet of “Direct to Cell” Starlink satellites. As a result, Omnispace is urging the US regulator to force SpaceX to cease such tests. 

(Credit: Omnispace)

In a 43-page filing with the FCC, Omnispace explains it detected the interference in the 1990-1995MHz radio band while using a single “medium-earth orbit” satellite called Omni F2. But SpaceX claims the whole testing methodology is flawed. 

“Instead, Omnispace has merely demonstrated its ability to intentionally configure its lone MEO satellite to detect SpaceX’s direct-to-cell emissions,” the company told the FCC on Thursday, later adding: “Omnispace does not claim—or provide evidence to suggest—that SpaceX’s tests have harmfully interfered with any Omnispace service.”

Like SpaceX, Omnispace is also working to bring satellite connectivity to phones, but the company is still waiting to launch its fleet of satellites and remains years away from providing commercial services. 

In addition, SpaceX claims Omnispace has so far declined to coordinate satellite activities. “Unfortunately, Omnispace has never explained why it believes it is exempt from requirements to share information through coordination, choosing instead to refuse or ignore each of SpaceX’s requests to coordinate,” the letter from SpaceX says. 

However, Omnispace told PCMag that its findings should alarm the FCC since SpaceX is proposing operating thousands of direct to cell Starlink satellites in the coming years.

"Omnispace’s tests were conducted with our F2 satellite in its normal global operating configuration. The interference we measured came from a single SpaceX satellite, operating a single beam, to a single test location," the company argued. "Considering that a fully deployed SpaceX constellation will consist of hundreds to thousands of satellites, the potential for future interference would be exponentially greater."

"If Starlink were to choose another band, we’d have no complaints. We support SCS (Supplemental Coverage from Space) so long as the frequency selection does not result in interference to other SCS or MSS authorizations," Omnispace added. "SpaceX is operating on a 'cause no interference' basis, and as such is responsible to protect the operations of existing and future legally operating satellite systems across the globe."

The FCC has so far declined to comment on the matter. In the meantime, SpaceX is aiming to launch the cellular Starlink service for T-Mobile customers later this year, with the goal of connecting users in remote areas.

Editor's note: This story has been updated with a response from Omnispace.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio