PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm captures a field of view that's a little tighter than your average standard-angle lens and is extremely sharp. - Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm captures a field of view that's a little tighter than your average standard-angle lens and is extremely sharp.

Pros & Cons

    • Extremely sharp.
    • Minimal distortion.
    • Short telephoto field of view.
    • In-lens shutter.
    • Modest aperture.
    • Dim corners at wide aperture.
    • Long minimum focus distance.

Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 70
Dimensions 3.9 by 3 inches
Lens Mount Hasselblad X
Stabilization None
Type Lens
Weight 1.4

The Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm ($2,695) is one of just a trio of lenses available for purchase along with the X1D-50c mirrorless camera. The 90mm covers a short telephoto angle of view, and is the closest thing system owners will get to a standard lens until a promised 65mm comes out later this year. The tight field of view and long minimum focus distance don't make it an ideal standard prime, but that's not what it's supposed to be. It is an exceptionally sharp performer and an excellent option if you want a short telephoto lens for portraiture.

Design

The 3,2/90mm ( at Amazon) measures 3.9 by 3.0 inches (HD), weighs 1.4 pounds, and supports 67mm front filters. It's on the long side for the slim X1D body due to its short telephoto focal length, but balances well. The lens is finished in black, with a metal barrel and a rubberized focus ring. A metal lens hood is included. It secures tightly to the barrel, and has arrow indicators to let you know the correct attachment point for its standard orientation for shooting, or its reverse orientation for storage and transport.

Hasselblad X1D-50c : Sample Image

Due to the larger-than-35mm sensor in the X1D, the 90mm lens covers a field of view that's about equal to a 70mm prime on a full-frame system. It's a fine option for portraiture, but the long minimum working distance—2.3 feet (0.7-meter)—means you'll find yourself backing up to grab a shot in a tight space. If you want to work closer, you'll need to wait for the XCD Macro 3,5/120mm, which is set to ship later this year.

Like all XCD lenses, the 90mm has an in-lens leaf shutter. It can stay open at set durations between 60 minutes and 1/2,000-second, and due to its design can sync with a flash at any duration. Cameras that use focal plane shutters typically sync at 1/250-second at the fastest, so a leaf system is appealing to photographers who often employ flashes.

A motor drives focus in both manual and autofocus. But unlike other lenses with electronic manual focus, the 90mm's focus ring has quite a bit of tension, so you get a similar sensation of tactile feedback when turning it. Mirrorless lenses often deliver a disappointing manual focus experience, but that's not the case here.

Hasselblad 3,2/90mm : Sample Image

The lens is an f/3.2 design, which is a narrower maximum aperture than similar lenses for 135 format systems. It's easy to find an 85mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 prime for a smaller sensor, either of which will capture images with a shallower depth of field. Medium format lenses typically have narrower apertures than those designed for 135 systems. The Hasselblad HC 2,2/100mm is an exception. It can be used on the X1D via an adapter, but our tests show it to be not as crisp as the XCD 3,2/90mm, even when stopped down.

Image Quality

I used Imatest to check sharpness with the lens paired with the 50MP X1D. It puts up very solid scores on the center-weighted test. At f/3.2 it notches 4,199 lines per picture height, close to double what we want to see from a high-resolution camera at minimum. Image quality is strong from edge to edge, with the periphery of the frame showing 4,116 lines.

Hasselblad X1D-50c : Sample Image

Resolution improves as you narrow the aperture. The lens shows 4,656 lines at f/4, 4,770 lines at f/5.6, and 4,707 lines at f/8. Diffraction cuts into resolution at narrower f-stops, but it remains a solid performer at f/11 (4,454 lines), before underperforming at f/16 (3,804 lines), f/22 (2,765 lines), and f/32 (1,805 lines).

Related Story See How We Test Digital Cameras

Images show no visible distortion. There is some corner dimness at f/3.2 (-1.9EV), f/4 (-1.7EV), and f/5.6 (-1.4EV), but at narrower apertures the corners are within one f-stop of the center in illumination. Dim corners give images a slight, natural vignette, so some portrait shooters may actually like the look. But if you are shooting a landscape or similar image with the lens, you can use Lightroom CC or a similar Raw conversion tool to bring the brightness of the edges of the frame in line with the center with a simple adjustment.

Hasselblad X1D-50c : Sample Image

Conclusions

The Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm is an optical gem, with a focal length that is sure to appeal to portrait photographers. The maximum f/3.2 aperture doesn't blur backgrounds to the same extend as an f/1.4 or f/2 lens, so you'll want to be careful of what's behind your subject. It's a little large, and like most medium format glass on the pricey side. But the large size is required to deliver excellent optics, along with an integral leaf shutter and a pleasant manual focus experience, both of which are sure to please photographers serious enough to invest in medium format equipment.

Best Lens Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

The Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm captures a field of view that's a little tighter than your average standard-angle lens and is extremely sharp. - Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm

Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm

4.0 Excellent

The Hasselblad XCD 3,2/90mm captures a field of view that's a little tighter than your average standard-angle lens and is extremely sharp.

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio