PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Zeiss Otus 1.4/55

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 is a no-compromise manual focus lens that makes no sacrifice in optical performance in deference to size, weight, or cost. - Zeiss Otus 1.4/55
4.5 Outstanding

The Bottom Line

The Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 is a no-compromise manual focus lens that makes no sacrifice in optical performance in deference to size, weight, or cost.

Pros & Cons

    • Extremely sharp.
    • Apochromatic design.
    • Nominal distortion.
    • All-metal build.
    • Manual focus only.
    • Big.
    • Heavy.
    • Expensive.

Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Wide) 55
Dimensions 5.6 by 3.6 inches
Type Lens
Weight 2.1

The Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 ($3,990 list) is a fine example of a lens that makes no compromises. The 55mm f/1.4 manual focus optic, available for Canon and Nikon cameras, is perfectly sharp from edge to edge at all apertures, features an apochromatic design (so there's no color fringing in images), and is capable of capturing a heck of a lot of light. But the lack of compromises come at a cost: The Otus is pretty big and heavy, doesn't support autofocus, and is expensive compared with other SLR lenses. It's still worthy of our Editors' Choice award, based on its performance alone, but there are imperfect options available for less money.

The Otus measures 5.6 by 3.6 inches (HD) and weighs 2.1 pounds, heavier than some cameras to which you can mount it. A metal lens hood is included; it adds about 2 inches to the height of the lens when attached. The large front element supports 77mm filters. It's available in a ZE version for Canon EOS cameras and an ZF.2 version for Nikon SLRs. The Nikon version of the lens has a physical aperture ring, but that's unnceccessary for the Canon lens, as all EOS SLRs (35mm and digital) support electronic aperture control. The wide focus ring occupies a good portion of the barrel, and is covered with a hard rubber material. It's a departure from the bare metal rings on other Zeiss SLR lenses, but I grew to like it. It's not as cold to the touch, which is a boon for cold-weather shooting, and it offers enough grip for comfortable adjustments to focus. Behind it is the focus scale, in yellow, along with a depth of field scale with lines that mark full-stops from f/1.4 through f/16.

Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 : Sample Image

I was able to shoot with both the ZE and ZF.2 versions of the Otus. The sample images in the review were shot with the ZE lens and the Sony Alpha 7R via an adapter from Metabones, and Zeiss provided me with a ZF.2 version for sharpness testing, which I paired with the full-frame Nikon D800SEE IT. Manual focus on a mirrorless camera like the Alpha 7R is a more pleasurable experience than the D800 with a stock focusing screen. The focus screens in modern D-SLRs are optimized for autofocus lenses, and don't quite provide the precision that a split-prism screen in a vintage camera like the Nikon F3 offers. You can use Live View and magnification when time allows in order to achieve perfect focus. If you frequently use manual focus lenses, it's wise to consider a third-party focus screen for your SLR; Canon sells one that is optimized for wide-aperture lenses, and both Canon and Nikon shooters can look to third-party sources for traditional split-image screens, some of which have additional aids like microprism collars.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the Otus using a standard SFRPlus test chart. At f/1.4 it's an outstanding performer, scoring 3,015 lines per picture height on a center-weighted test. That's much, much higher than the 1,800 lines we require for a photo to be called sharp, and impressively the extreme edges of the frame are just as sharp as the center. It only gets better as you stop down: 3,265 lines at f/2, 3,602 lines at f/2.8, 3,829 lines at f/4, 3,899 lines at f/5.6, and 3,951 lines at f/8. Distortion is a nonissue; the lens shows 0.7 percent barrel distortion, but that's barely relevant in field conditions. There's no evidence of falloff at the corners; the vignette in the shot below was added in Lightroom.

Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 : Sample Image

Zeiss is no stranger to delivering impressive lenses. The Otus can be looked at as a premium version of one of the exceptions to that rule, the Planar T* 1,4/50SEE IT, a rare Zeiss lenses that is downright soft at its maximum aperture. The Zeiss-Makro Planar T* 2/50 is a better lens if you want a high-quality manual focus lens without spending $4,000. It's not inexpensive, but it's an impressive performer that's a feather weight compared to the Otus; but it only captures half the light at its maximum aperture.

The Otus 1.4/55 is an accomplishment. It's as impressive an optic as the last lens that the company introduced, the excellent Apo Sonnar T* 2/135. Aside from the lack of autofocus, which is a design choice that allows for a smooth focus ring with a very long throw, the only real complaints with the lens are its size and weight. But a lens requires a lot of glass to capture images like the Otus does. If you're the type of photographer who values image quality over all, the Otus is a dream lens.

Final Thoughts

The Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 is a no-compromise manual focus lens that makes no sacrifice in optical performance in deference to size, weight, or cost. - Zeiss Otus 1.4/55

Zeiss Otus 1.4/55

4.5 Outstanding

The Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 is a no-compromise manual focus lens that makes no sacrifice in optical performance in deference to size, weight, or cost.

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio