PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Tesla Challenges $243M Ruling Tying Autopilot to Fatal Crash

The judgment, which found Autopilot partially responsible for a fatal 2019 crash, 'flies in the face of basic Florida tort law, the Due Process Clause, and common sense,’ Tesla says.

 & Will McCurdy Contributor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Credit: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)

Don't miss out on our latest stories. Add PCMag as a preferred source on Google.


Tesla is now seeking to overturn a ruling that found its self-driving Autopilot feature partially responsible for a fatal crash in 2019.

According to a new filing in a Florida federal court, Tesla's lawyers argue that the crash “was a tragedy that was entirely the doing of a driver who was reckless in the extreme by ignoring or overriding every safety feature in his car.”

The EV giant’s legal team says that “the $243 million judgment against Tesla flies in the face of basic Florida tort law, the Due Process Clause, and common sense.”

"In 2019, no vehicle—anywhere in the world—could have prevented the tragic consequences of George McGee’s extraordinary recklessness," read the filing, spotted by Reuters.

The crash in a rural area of Key Largo, Florida, resulted in the death of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon, while the victim's boyfriend was severely injured and suffered a brain injury. The crash occurred while the driver, George Brian McGee, was driving a Model S electric sedan with Tesla’s Autopilot feature engaged. McGee dropped his phone, and while he stooped down to pick it up, his Model S accelerated through an intersection at over 60mph, crashing into an empty parked car and its nearby owners.

At the time of the decision, some lawyers said the legal judgment could prove highly important, encouraging others to seek legal action following future crashes involving self-driving cars.

The move to overturn the case comes as the general public is clearly open to holding Tesla's self-driving system accountable in serious crashes. According to new research from the Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report, when it comes to car accidents involving Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving, two-thirds of consumers say that Tesla should compensate victims of crashes involving its advanced driver-assistance technologies.

Meanwhile, Tesla’s self-driving tech is no longer a major selling point for many. As per the research, now only a slim minority—4%—say Full Self-Driving makes them “much more” likely to purchase a Tesla. Meanwhile, 7% of respondents said that Full Self-Driving made them “somewhat less” likely to buy a Tesla.

About Our Expert

Will McCurdy

Will McCurdy

Contributor

I’m a reporter covering weekend news. Before joining PCMag in 2024, I picked up bylines in BBC News, The Guardian, The Times of London, The Daily Beast, Vice, Slate, Fast Company, The Evening Standard, The i, TechRadar, and Decrypt Media.

I’ve been a PC gamer since you had to install games from multiple CD-ROMs by hand. As a reporter, I’m passionate about the intersection of tech and human lives. I’ve covered everything from crypto scandals to the art world, as well as conspiracy theories, UK politics, and Russia and foreign affairs.

Read full bio