PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Polaroid Go

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Polaroid Go - Polaroid Go
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

The Polaroid Go is among the tiniest instant cameras you can buy, but its prints are small and Go film costs too much given its mediocre quality.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Small, light design
    • Retro Polaroid aesthetics
    • One-touch exposure
    • Selfie mirror
    • USB charging
    • Expensive, finicky film
    • Tiny prints

Polaroid Go Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 34mm
Connectivity micro USB
Dimensions 2.4 by 3.3 by 5.9 inches
Memory Card Format Polaroid Go
Stabilization None
Type Analog
Viewfinder Type Optical
Weight 8.5

The Polaroid Go ($99.99) is the smallest instant camera on the market. It fits in your palm of your hand, snaps shots with point-and-click simplicity, and has a clever mirrored viewfinder to frame selfies. That's all good, but the film itself nets tiny prints with dull colors. Images taken by the Polaroid Go simply don't have a lot of impact, and the film is expensive. If you want an easy-to-use instant camera for square snapshots, get the $119.95 Fujifilm SQ1 instead.

Points for Cuteness

The Go's design is a throwback, one that plays on nostalgia for Polaroid cameras from the '70s. It's finished in white plastic with a few splashes of color. The company's rainbow stripe logo is positioned above the lens, and the shutter release, Polaroid Go logo, and wrist strap are bright red.

Polaroid Go
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

The camera is palm-size, at about 2.4 by 3.3 by 5.9 inches (HWD). It's made for one-hand use, with the shutter at the top right. There's a second button nearby, used to turn the flash on or off, and the power button is on the rear, next to the LED film counter display.

Polaroid Go : Sample Image
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

The lens covers about the same angle of view as a 35mm prime. It's good for single and two-person selfies. Optics are plastic, typical for affordable instant cameras. Details in prints are a little soft, but the photos are pretty small to begin with. The lens flares when shooting into the sun, so avoid backlit scenes.

Polaroid Go : Sample Image
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

An internal, rechargeable battery provides power. It charges via micro USB and Polaroid promises it can handle 15 packs of film between charges. I only had two packs to try, so I wasn't able to run down the battery to verify the claim.

Polaroid Go Film

The Go uses a new, eponymous film format. It's a cartridge format, with eight shots in each container. Polaroid prices it at $19.99 for two packs, about $1.25 per photo. If you use the Go with any frequency, it won't be long before you've spent more on film than the camera. Film isn't included, either, something to remember if you decide to buy one.

Polaroid Go : Sample Image
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

Prints are small, about two inches wide, including the border. The color film takes some time to develop and has to be shielded from light during the early stages of the process. Because of this, the Go includes an opaque film to cover pictures after they eject from the camera. You'll want to stow them in a camera bag or jacket pocket as they develop.

It's not the only issue with the film. Polaroid warns against color shifts toward green on cold days and red on hot ones.

Polaroid Go : Sample Image
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

Our test shots were a mixed bag. My first pack of film turned out poorly—images were underexposed, colors were dull, and my outdoor selfies looked like they were snapped inside a dim room (for the record, I shot them outdoors on a gray June afternoon). 

The second pack turned out a lot better. I used it on a summer morning at a nearby national park and netted shots with much brighter, vibrant colors. Accuracy wasn't perfect—the film shows my eyeglasses as having Walter Sobchak yellow lenses, which they don't.

Polaroid Go : Sample Image
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

But even with vibrant results, the pictures themselves are just small. Fujifilm's Instax Square format has proven to be more reliable and consistent over the years, and has a larger, more impactful size (2.4 inches). It costs a little less too, at about $0.90 per image for color. It's a better instant film, and there's even a black-and-white option available, though at a higher $1.49/image cost.

Polaroid Go : Sample Image
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

You Can Pass on the Go

The Polaroid Go is a cute, tiny instant camera. It's the smallest you'll find with a pure analog process. Once the novelty factor wears off, however, you're left with undersized prints that require more care in handling and cost more to make than the Fujifilm's competing Instax Square format.

Polaroid Go
(Photo: Jim Fisher)

The Fujifilm Instax Square SQ1 remains our Editors' Choice winner for affordable, square format instant cameras. It's not as svelte as the Go, but it's available in a few fun colors and lets you switch to black-and-white film if the artistic spirit catches you.

Final Thoughts

Polaroid Go - Polaroid Go

Polaroid Go

2.5 Fair

The Polaroid Go is among the tiniest instant cameras you can buy, but its prints are small and Go film costs too much given its mediocre quality.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio