PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple iPhone 4S vs. Nokia Lumia 900: AT&T Smartphone Showdown

 & Alex Colon Executive Editor, Reviews

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The highly anticipated, Windows Phone-based Nokia Lumia 900 hits AT&T April 8 with an aggressively low $99.99 price tag, but it's already available for preorder. Since this is a flagship product for Nokia and Microsoft, everyone is sure be to paying extra close attention. And if what we saw at CES is any indication, the Lumia 900 will definitely be the Windows Phone to beat. But is it also good enough to best Apple's almighty iPhone 4S? We compare specs in the table below to help you decide.

The Lumia 900 is the third device in Nokia's Lumia portfolio, following the Lumia 800 overseas and the Lumia 710 for T-Mobile. Though the 710 was met with mostly lukewarm reviews, the Lumia 900 is more like a mix of the better-received Lumia 800 and the Nokia N9.

The 900 features a 4.3-inch, 800-by-480 pixel AMOLED ClearBlack display, which is significantly larger than the iPhone's 3.5-inch screen, though the iPhone has a sharper 960-by-640 pixel resolution. The Lumia is powered by a single-core, 1.4-GHz Qualcomm APQ8055 processor and runs on AT&T's super-fast new 4G LTE network. The phone also has an 8-megapixel primary camera with a Carl Zeiss lens, though it captures 720p video compared to the iPhone's 1080p.

One thing both phones definitely have in common is good looks. The Lumia 900 features rolled edges and a flat bottom, and will initially be available in black, blue, or white.

iPhone vs. Lumia

The iPhone 4S ($199.99 - $399.99 with a two-year contract), meanwhile, is powered by Apple's new dual-core A5 chip, which Apple claims can deliver up to two times more power and seven times faster graphics performance than the iPhone 4. It has an 8-megapixel rear camera with 1080p video capture, and is available in 16, 32, or 64GB versions.

While the specs for both phones are relatively similar, one of the biggest differences is that the Lumia 900 uses AT&T's 4G LTE network, while the iPhone 4S uses 3G. (Make no mistake, even though the iPhone 4S may now show a little "4G" icon, HSPA+ 14.4 is certainly not 4G.) LTE is far faster than HSPA+. Back when we initially reviewed AT&T's iPhone 4S, in a number of head-to-head speed tests the LTE-compatible Samsung Skyrocket averaged 15.4Mbps down and 3.9Mbps up, while the iPhone 4S pulled in 3Mbps down and 1Mbps up. That's a big difference, and one to pay attention to if you're a network speed freak.

There's also the matter of platforms. The Lumia 900 uses Windows Phone 7.5 (Mango), while the iPhone 4S is running iOS 5. WP 7.5 is the simplest smartphone OS out there, and places Facebook and Twitter at its core to make for a highly social experience. It even won our Reader's Choice award. But right now the Windows Phone Marketplace is home to just 65,000 apps. That may sound like a lot, but compare it to the 500,000 available from the Apple App Store and it's not nearly as impressive. Simply put, if you want a smartphone to play particular apps, like Cut the Rope, Draw Something, Pandora, Temple Run, or Words With Friend, you're out of luck on the Lumia.

So which phone is the winner? Both have strong specs and comparable hardware, so it largely comes down to software. If you're looking for speed and simplicity, with a dash of Facebook, the Lumia 900 is a great choice. But if you're looking to put your artistic skills to the test in a game of Draw Something, the iPhone 4S still offers an unbeatable app experience.

For more phone reviews, news, and tips, check out PCMag's Cell Phones Product Guide.

About Our Expert

Alex Colon

Alex Colon

Executive Editor, Reviews

My Experience

I’m PCMag’s executive editor of reviews, steering our coverage to make sure we're testing the products you're interested in buying and telling you whether they're worth it. I've been here for more than 10 years. I previously managed the consumer electronics reviews team, and before that, I covered mobile, smart home, and wearable technology for PCMag and Gigaom. 

My Areas of Expertise

  • I’ve written hundreds of reviews of cell phones, fitness trackers, robot vacuums, smartwatches, and various other products.
  • I’ve also edited thousands of reviews and articles on consumer electronics technologies and products. 

The Technology I Use

I’m writing this bio on my 24-inch blue iMac, which I initially bought for personal use, but quickly decided to use for work instead of my tiny, company-issued ThinkPad (sorry, IT team). The screen is big, bright, and sharp, and the speakers are surprisingly good considering how thin the machine is.

The other big screen in my life is a 65-inch LG C9 OLED TV. If you’re wondering whether OLED is worth the premium over LCD, I’m here to tell you that it is.

I’d be doing my beloved LG C9 a disservice if I didn’t have it hooked up to a capable sound system, so I have a Sonos Beam sitting on a media console underneath the TV, and two Sonos Ones set up as rear channels for surround sound. If you’re a Sonos user, I highly recommend adding the Sonos Sub to your setup. It’s definitely a little more expensive than it should be, but it's truly money well spent.

Of course, as an editor, I also do plenty of reading that isn’t related to work, and I love to sit down with a good, old-fashioned, paper-and-ink book. But when carrying a book isn’t convenient, I break out my first-generation Kindle Paperwhite, which is still working just fine nearly 10 years in.

With 15 years of experience in tech, Alex guides PCMag's product testing to help you decide what's worth buying and how to get the most out of it.

Read full bio