PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

UK 'Snooper's Charter' Expands Police Access to Web Histories

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

It's time for more snooping in the U.K. Not content with a draft bill that would allow the government to access up to 12 months of citizens' browsing histories, yesterday a Parliamentary committee introduced a final version of the bill that would expand the scope of those powers.

The final bill would allow police investigating crimes to access all web browsing activities, not just those suspected to be illegal, The Guardian reports. Hours after the bill was introduced, in what the paper described as a "highly unusual" move, the Home Office issued a clarification, explaining that the hacking powers aren't new and that accessing those records are standard police practice.

"The revised Bill we introduced today reflects the majority of the committees' recommendations – we have strengthened safeguards, enhanced privacy protections and bolstered oversight arrangements - and will now be examined by Parliament before passing into law by the end of 2016," Home Secretary Theresa May said in a statement.

But security advocates aren't convinced. They've nicknamed the bill the "Snooper's Charter," and claim that it will interfere with encryption. One provision allows the police to request that tech companies break their own encryption in some circumstances, but only if it is practical to do so.

Entrepreneur and Tech London Advocates director Russ Shaw told Newsweek that the expansive power the bill affords the government is a double-edged sword.

"While it is important that police and security services are equipped with the tools required to tackle online crime, the Investigatory Powers Bill ignores the recommendations of technology companies and irrevocably sacrifices consumer privacy," Shaw said in a statement.

The Joint Committee on Investigatory Powers apparently shares some of those concerns, since it has already revised and clarified the bill several times. As the bill heads for debate in Parliament, it could be revised again.

This article originally appeared on PCMag.com.

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio