PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Banning Encryption Is Pretty Pointless, Report Finds

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The majority of encryption products on the market today are developed outside the United States, according to a new report, raising serious doubts about whether the U.S. government could actually limit encryption tools by building backdoors for law enforcement access.

Of the 865 hardware or software products incorporating encryption that the report's authors surveyed, 546 products originate from foreign countries. If the U.S. passes a law requiring encryption products to have backdoors for law enforcement, what's to stop the bad guys from using an encryption tool from a country that doesn't have such a law?

There's nothing too Earth-shattering about a report that simply takes inventory of encryption products available worldwide. Moreover, the authors are quick to note that their tally is a work in progress and is probably on the low side. But it comes at a pivotal time in the debate over how much access law enforcement should have to citizens' data in the U.S. and other Western nations.

Apple, Google, and other companies are embroiled in a tussle with the FBI, which wants access to iMessage and other communications tools for investigative purposes. To facilitate this, state lawmakers in New York and California have introduced bills that would ban the sale of encrypted smartphones, though Congress is pushing back on that. 

Law enforcement agencies face numerous challenges as they try to outmaneuver the most advanced cyber criminals and terrorists, who will be savvy enough to avoid encryption tools from countries that pass backdoor laws. The problem is ensuring that law-abiding citizens aren't caught in the crossfire.

As the report's authors wrote, "Any national law mandating encryption backdoors will overwhelmingly affect the innocent users of those products."

This article originally appeared on PCMag.com.

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio