PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Lexmark X9575

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Lexmark X9575
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

Though the Lexmark X9575 Professional scores poorly as a printer, it largely makes up for that with network connections and lots of features for scanning, faxing, and copying.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Duplexer for printing on both sides of a page.
    • Ethernet and Wi-Fi support.
    • Scans and faxes over network.
    • Standalone fax and copier.
    • Slow.
    • Subpar text for an ink jet.
    • No printed installation instructions.
    • Some features are hard to find.

Lexmark X9575 Specs

Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, graph: 0:44 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, table A (with grid): 0:15 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 3 pages, charts and graphs: 1:54 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft PowerPoint 2003 - 4 full-page slides: 3:27 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Word 2003 - 2 pages, text: 0:20 (min:sec)
Claimed lifetime for photos - dark storage: 350 years
Claimed lifetime for photos - framed behind glass: 100 years
Color or Monochrome: 1-pass color
Connection Type: Ethernet
Connection Type: USB
Connection Type: Wireless
Cost Per Page (Color): 11.2 cents
Cost Per Page (Mono): 5.2 cents
Direct Printing from Cameras: Yes
Direct Printing from Cameras: Yes (via cable)
Direct Printing from Media Slots: CompactFlash Type I
Direct Printing from Media Slots: CompactFlash Type II
Direct Printing from Media Slots: Memory Stick
Direct Printing from Media Slots: Memory Stick Duo
Direct Printing from Media Slots: Memory Stick Pro
Direct Printing from Media Slots: Memory Stick Pro Duo
Direct Printing from Media Slots: Microdrive
Direct Printing from Media Slots: MiniSD Card
Direct Printing from Media Slots: MultiMedia Card
Direct Printing from Media Slots: Secure Digital
Direct Printing from Media Slots: SmartMedia
Direct Printing from Media Slots: xD-Picture Card
Duty Cycle: 7500 pages per month
Ink Jet Type: Standard All-Purpose
Input Capacity (printer input only): 150 sheets
LCD Preview Screen: Yes
Maximum Scan Area: 8.5" x 14"
Maximum Standard Paper Size: Legal
Network-Ready: Yes
Number of Cartridges: 2
Number of Ink Colors: 6
Photos - HIGH -QUALITY SETTINGS - Adobe Photoshop 7 - Average output time per print: 4" x 6" prints : 2:08 (min:sec)
Print Duplexing: Yes
Printer Category: Ink Jet
Scanner Optical Resolution: 1200 pixels per inch
Scanner Type: Flatbed with ADF (Standard or Optional)
Standalone Copier and Fax: Copier
Standalone Copier and Fax: Fax
Type: All-In-One
Water/smudge proof or resistant: Yes

As one of four initial models in Lexmark's new Professional Series of all-in-ones (AIOs), the Lexmark X9575 Professional ($249.99 direct) is explicitly aimed at the small office and home office. With that in mind, it's important to understand that although the printer is packed with office-centric features, it also offers photo-centric functions for home use. This combination makes the X9575 appropriate for double duty as a home and home-office AIO.

Setup—mostly standard fare—consists of finding some flat space for the 10.6-by-18.3-by-15.1-inch (HWD) AIO, installing the black and color ink cartridges, loading paper, connecting a cable, and running the automated installation routine. The one unusual—and potentially annoying—touch is a complete lack of printed instructions. Instead, the setup program walks you through each step onscreen. Some people may prefer this approach, but I find it disconcerting to be unable to look over the setup steps beforehand. In any event, I was able to test the AIO using a wired network connection and Windows XP. According to Lexmark, the disc will also install drivers and a full set of programs for Windows 2000, Vista, and Mac OS X 10.3 or later.

The X9575's photo-centric features include the ability to print photos from memory cards, PictBridge-compatible cameras, and USB keys. You can also preview photos on the 2.4-inch LCD display and edit them using the built-in menus.

Office-centric features start with the ability to scan and fax, even over a network, and work as a standalone copier and fax machine. Even better, the 50-page automatic document feeder (ADF) takes the work out of scanning, copying, or faxing multipage documents. A built-in duplexer lets you print on both sides of a page easily—an important requirement for some kinds of business documents, and an easy way to save money by cutting your paper use nearly in half.

The input tray holds 150 sheets of paper. That's a little on the low side, but if you need a higher capacity, Lexmark also sells a 150-sheet tray ($79.99) for a total 300-sheet capacity. By comparison, the Brother MFC-685cw, intended for the same target users, holds only 100 pages. On the other hand, the MFC-685cw includes a separate 4-by-6 tray for photo paper, so you can have both photo and plain paper loaded at once. With the X9575, unless you get the optional second tray, you have to change paper when you want to switch between printing photos and documents.

Three features define the Professional Series as distinct from Lexmark's other AIOs: availability of a high-capacity print cartridge that ships with the printer, lifetime priority phone support, and a one-year warranty that includes next-business-day replacement. Lexmark claims a cost of 11.2 cents per color page and 5.2 cents per monochrome page with the high-yield cartridges.

Speed is not one of the X9575's strong points, to put it mildly. Its total time on our business applications suite was 22 minutes 7 seconds (using QualityLogic's hardware and software for timing, www.qualitylogic.com). That's far slower than, for example, the less expensive Editors' Choice Canon Pixma MP610, at 12:18. But the MP610 focuses more on printing, without as many AIO features. A more direct comparison would be to the Brother MFC-685cw, which offers a similar set of features and roughly the same slow, but tolerable, speed (21:51). Photo speed was also on the slow side, averaging 2:08 for each 4-by-6 and 4:33 for each 8-by-10.

Output quality is on the low side overall as well. Graphics are on a par with those of most ink jets, but text and photos are both below par. All of the fonts on our text test that you might use in business documents were easily readable at 8 points, but they all needed a size of 10 points or larger to qualify as well formed. Even then, they lacked the crisp edges you'd see in the best-looking text output. I'd call the text good enough for basic business documents, but not suitable if you need to use small fonts, or need documents that look fully professional. I wouldn't even consider using the X9575 for something like a resumé, for example.

Graphics have a tendency to lose thin lines, but that's a common problem with printers. As long as you stay away from thin lines, the output is easily good enough for almost any business use, including material like PowerPoint handouts.

For my photo tests, I used a photo cartridge to print using six ink colors rather than four. The results were just short of true photo quality: a touch too much contrast, and a touch too punchy for serious photographers or for showing off in a frame. On the other hand, they're good enough for printing snapshots to hand out to family and friends or display on a refrigerator or bulletin board.

The X9575's relatively slow speed and subpar output quality limit its appeal. But if your print needs aren't particularly demanding and you need the X9575's other features—scanning to and faxing from your PC, connecting by wired or wireless network (or both), and standalone copying and faxing, it's a more than reasonable possibility. If you're considering it, however, make sure you also take a look at the Brother MFC-685cw, which is even more limited as a printer but less expensive.

Check out the Lexmark X9575 Professional's test scores.

More Multi-Function Printer Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Lexmark X9575

Lexmark X9575

3.0 Average

Though the Lexmark X9575 Professional scores poorly as a printer, it largely makes up for that with network connections and lots of features for scanning, faxing, and copying.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio