PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ MX522

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
BenQ MX522 - BenQ MX522
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The BenQ MX522 business projector is light enough to carry easily, at 5.1 pounds and offers a bright, high-quality data image at a native XGA (1024 by 768) resolution, plus watchable video and 3D.
Best Deal£570.54

Buy It Now

£570.54

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 3,000-lumen rating.
    • Lamp rated at up to 10,000 hours.
    • High-quality data image.
    • Works with Blu-ray for 3D.
    • Low-volume sound system.

BenQ MX522 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 3000
Warranty 12
Weight 5.1

If you're looking for an inexpensive XGA (1,024 by 768) projector, add the BenQ MX522($216.50 at Amazon) to your list of possibilities. It weighs just 5 pounds 2 ounces, making it easy to carry if you need to; it's bright enough, with a 3,000-lumen rating, for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom; and it delivers high-quality data images along with watchable, if not high-quality, video. It also offers 3D with sources like Blu-ray players. And, as a bonus, its 10,000-hour lamp life can help keep running costs down. That all adds up to making the MX522 a potentially attractive choice.

Like the directly competitive ViewSonic PJD6235($749.00 at Amazon), the MX522 is built around a DLP engine. It also shares the same advantages the PJD6235 has over the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite 93+ of being more than two pounds lighter and offering a higher brightness rating. As with the ViewSonic model, however, the brightness comparison to the Epson 93+ isn't as straightforward as you might think.

Differences between white brightness and color brightness are often significant for DLP projectors, but not for three-chip LCD projectors like the Epson 93+.Those differences can affect both the brightness of color images and color quality. So just because the MX522 and Viewsonic PJD6235 both offer a higher white brightness rating than the Epson model doesn't mean they'll be brighter for all images. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why it matters.) As a point of reference, I found the MX522 bright enough in my tests to stand up to moderate ambient light with a 98-inch diagonal image at its 4:3 native aspect ratio.

The Basics

Projectors in the MX522's size and weight class often wind up permanently installed or on a cart. Even so, the projector is both light enough and small enough, at 4.4 by 11.9 by 8.7 inches (HWD), to carry with you if you want to. It comes without a carrying case, however, so you might want to add in the cost of one if you're comparing prices with another model that comes with a case. (BenQ's optional case is $40 street.)

Setup is standard, with manual zoom and focus controls. The 1.1 zoom isn't much, but it's typical for a low-cost projector, and it gives you at least a little flexibility in how far you can put the projector from the screen for a given size image. Connectors for image sources include the usual HDMI port for a computer or video source, VGA ports for computers or component video, plus S-Video and composite video ports.

Image Quality and Audio

The MX522 did a good job on data image quality, sailing through our standard suite of DisplayMate tests without any significant issues. Color balance was good to excellent in all modes, with suitably neutral grays at all levels from black to white. Colors in most modes were fully saturated and suitably eye catching. The only important exception was the brightest mode, with some colors a little dark in terms of a hue-saturation-brightness color model. The projector also did a good job with fine detail, with both black text on white and white text on black crisp and highly readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points.

Video quality is best described as watchable, as long as you're not too demanding. It's obviously limited by the native resolution, with the projector needing to scale HD video to fit in the available pixels on the chip, and it suffers from both visible noise and a low contrast ratio that leaves colors a little dull. However, I didn't see any posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually) and the projector did a good job with shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) even with test clips that most data projectors have problems with.

Also very much on the plus side is that I saw so few rainbow artifacts, for both data and video images,that it's unlikely anyone in your audience would find them bothersome.

The 3D image quality deserves special mention. The projector offers an HDMI 1.4a port, which means it will let you connect directly to a Blu-ray player or other video source for 3D. As you would expect, the 3D video quality suffers from the same limitations as 2D video, but I didn't see any crosstalk in my tests and saw only a hint of 3D-related motion artifacts. If you want to use 3D, however, you'll have to buy 144Hz DLP-Link glasses separately.

Other Issues

As I've already mentioned, the MX522 claims an extraordinarily long lamp life of up to 10,000 hours, compared with 2,000 to 5,000 hours for most projectors. It gets the long life largely though what BenQ calls SmartEco technology, which adjusts the lamp power based on the image content, a trick that both lengthens lamp life and lowers electricity costs. The 10,000 hour claim is based on what BenQ considers typical use.

The one shortcoming for the projector is its audio system. The two-watt speaker arguably delivers enough volume to fill a small conference room but not much more. If you need audio, you should plan on using an external sound system.

The BenQ MX522 doesn't quite rise to the level of Editors' Choice, but it offers a highly attractive mix of features. It's portable, bright, and delivers high-quality data images and watchable video. It doesn't hurt either that it's nearly as rainbow-free as an LCD projector, or that its SmartEco technology helps save on running costs, or that, even if you don't plan to use 3D now, the 3D support helps future-proof your investment. All this makes the BenQ MX522 well worth considering, and should earn it a place on your short list.

 

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

BenQ MX522 - BenQ MX522

BenQ MX522 Review

4.0 Excellent

The BenQ MX522 business projector is light enough to carry easily, at 5.1 pounds and offers a bright, high-quality data image at a native XGA (1024 by 768) resolution, plus watchable video and 3D.

Get It Now
Best Deal£570.54

Buy It Now

£570.54

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio