PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Viewsonic PJD6235

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Viewsonic PJD6235 - Viewsonic PJD6235
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The ViewSonic PJD6235 business projector weighs just 4 pounds 10 ounces, making it highly portable, and it offers a bright, high-quality data image with a native XGA (1024 by 768) resolution.
Best Deal£1307.16

Buy It Now

£1307.16

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 3,000-lumen rating.
    • Highly portable.
    • High-quality data image.
    • Long lamp life.
    • Rainbow artifacts show relatively often in video.
    • Exceedingly low volume.

Viewsonic PJD6235 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces Ethernet
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 3000
Warranty 36
Weight 4.6

If you need a portable projector with XGA (1024 by 768) resolution, the ViewSonic PJD6235($749.00 at Amazon) is an obvious candidate. Light enough to carry easily, at 4 pounds 10 ounces, and bright enough to stand up to fairly high levels of ambient light, with a 3,000-lumen brightness rating, it also delivers high-quality data images and a long lamp life. Add in the LAN connector that lets you control it over a network, and it's even worth considering for permanent installation. Either way—portable or permanent—it's a potentially good choice.

The PJD6235 clearly outdoes its competition in some ways. In comparison to the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite 93+ in particular it's both lighter, by more than two pounds, and it offers a higher brightness rating. There's no arguing with the weight difference. However, the brightness comparison isn't as straightforward as it could be, given that the Epson projector is LCD based and the PJD6235 is DLP based.

Three-chip LCD projectors offer the same color brightness as white brightness. DLP projectors like the PJD6235, on the other hand, usually have  lower color brightness than white brightness, which can affect both the brightness of color images and color quality.

That's important to keep in mind, because it complicates brightness comparisons between the two technologies. It even complicates comparisons between DLP projectors. Just because the Dell S320wi( at Amazon) has the same brightness rating as the PJD6235, for example, doesn't mean it's color brightness is the same. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, and Why You Should Care.)

The Basics

The PJD6235 offers a suitably small size to go along with the light weight, at 3.3 by 10.5 by 8.7 inches (HWD). However, ViewSonic doesn't include a carrying case with it, so if you need one be sure to consider the added cost when you compare the price to other models that include a case. (ViewSonic's optional case is $20 street.)

Setup is standard. Plug in the power cord and appropriate cables, and adjust the manual zoom and focus. The zoom is only 1.1x, which doesn't give you much flexibility for how far you can put the projector from the screen for a given size image, but any zoom is better than none.

Connectors for image sources include the usual HDMI port for a computer or video source, VGA ports for computers or component video, plus S-Video and Composite video ports. Missing from the list is a USB A port for reading files from a memory key. And note that the LAN port I mentioned earlier is strictly for controlling the projector over a network.

Image Quality and Audio

Data image quality is one of the PJD6235's strong points, with the projector doing a good job on our standard suite of DisplayMate tests. Color balance was excellent in all modes, with suitably neutral grays at all levels from black to white, and colors in most modes were suitably eye catching, despite a slightly mustard color for yellow.

More important for data images is the fact that I saw little to no pixel jitter with an analog connection even on screens designed to bring out jitter. The projector also did a good job with fine detail, with both black text on white and white text on black crisp and highly readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points.

Video image quality is obviously limited by the native resolution, with the projector needing to scale HD video to fit in the available pixels on the chip. On the plus side, I didn't see any posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually) and the projector also did a good job with shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) even with test clips that tend to cause these problems.

One potentially key issue for video is rainbow artifacts—with light areas breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows. These are always a potential problem for single-chip DLP projectors because of the way the projectors create colors. I didn't see the artifacts often enough in data images to consider them a problem, but they showed up often enough in video images that anyone who sees them easily is likely to find them annoying. If you're sensitive to them, or are concerned that someone in your audience might be, this limits the PJD6235 to showing short video clips at most.

A less critical shortcoming is the underpowered audio. The two-watt speaker delivers acceptable quality for presentations, but the volume isn't enough to fill a small conference room. If you need audio, plan on using an external sound system.

Other Issues

Very much on the plus side for the PJD6235 is a longer than usual lamp life at 4,500 hours in Normal mode and 6,000 hours in Eco mode. The replacement cost for the lamp is a fairly typical, and hefty, $240 street, but the long lamp life will still help keep the total cost of ownership down.

One other feature that demands mention is support for 3D, with the HDMI 1.4a port letting you connect directly to a Blu-ray player or other video source for 3D. However, 3D video has the same issue with rainbow artifacts as 2D video, and, in my tests, I needed to use 144Hz DLP-Link glasses to work with Blu-ray 3D at 24 frames per second. For games, both my old 120Hz glasses and the 144Hz glasses worked without problems.

The PJD6235 delivers a potentially attractive balance of portability, brightness, data-image quality, and price. If you need to show much video and are concerned about rainbow artifacts, you'll be better off with an LCD projector like the Epson PowerLite 93+. But if video isn't an issue, the PJD6235 delivers good data image quality in a lighter, more portable, format. That can make it a more than reasonable choice, particularly if you don't need to use it for video or aren't concerned about rainbow artifacts.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Viewsonic PJD6235 - Viewsonic PJD6235

ViewSonic PJD6235 Review

3.5 Good

The ViewSonic PJD6235 business projector weighs just 4 pounds 10 ounces, making it highly portable, and it offers a bright, high-quality data image with a native XGA (1024 by 768) resolution.

Get It Now
Best Deal£1307.16

Buy It Now

£1307.16

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio