PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ MX600

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The BenQ MX600 projector offers a 3,200-lumen rating, XGA (1024 by 768) resolution, and a claimed 10,000 hour lamp life. - BenQ MX600
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The BenQ MX600 projector is light enough to carry easily, at 5.1 pounds, and delivers both a bright, high-quality data image and surprisingly good video, along with 3D and MHL support.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Bright.
    • High-quality data and video.
    • MHL enabled.
    • Works with Blu-ray for 3D.
    • Lamp life rated at up to 10,000 hours.
    • Although it shows fewer rainbow artifacts than most DLP projectors, it's not entirely rainbow free.

BenQ MX600 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 3200
Warranty 36
Weight 5.1

Only a little more expensive than the BenQ MX522, the BenQ MX600 ($499 direct) projector delivers everything the MX522 offers—including high-quality data images along with highly watchable video—and more. The two most obvious differences are its far more usable audio system, with a 10-watt, rather than 2-watt, speaker, and the MHL support, which makes it easy to show images from MHL-enabled mobile devices. Either of these by itself would be a tempting sweetener. Together, they help make the MX600 well worth the step up in price.

Beyond these two features, the two models have a lot more in common than they have differences, starting with both being bright enough for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom. The MX600 offers a smidge higher brightness rating, at 3,200 lumens, but that's a small enough jump so it's hard to see any difference. Both offer 3D support for video sources like Blu-Ray players, and both claim a 10,000-hour lamp life to help keep running costs down.

Both models are also built around a DLP engine with a native XGA (1,024-by-768) resolution, and both share essentially the same advantages and disadvantages compared with the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite 93+. The BenQ models each weigh more than two pounds less than the Epson model, and they offer a higher brightness rating. As I discussed in my review of the MX522, however, the brightness comparison isn't as straightforward as you might think.

Color brightness matches white brightness for three-chip LCD projectors like the 93+, but the two are often significantly different for DLP projectors, an issue that can affect both the brightness of color images and color quality. What this translates to is that a higher white brightness rating for the BenQ models compared to the 93+ doesn't mean they'll be brighter for all images. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why it matters.) That said, the MX600 was bright enough in my tests to stand up to moderate ambient light with a 98-inch diagonal image at its 4:3 native aspect ratio.

The Basics

The MX600 is a little bigger than the BenQ MX522, at 4.5 by 11.3 by 9.2 inches (HWD), but essentially the same weight, at five pounds 1 ounce. That puts it in a size and weight class that often winds up permanently installed or on a cart, but it is also small and light enough to carry with you. As with the MX522, however, it comes without a carrying case. (BenQ's optional case is $39 list.)

Setup is standard, with manual focus and 1.1x manual zoom, which gives you a little flexibility in how far you can put the projector from the screen for a given size image. Connectors for image sources include the usual HDMI port for a computer or video source, two VGA ports for computers or component video, plus S-Video and composite video ports.

The HDMI port is MHL-enabled. That means you can connect an MHL-enabled smartphone or tablet to show whatever is on the mobile device's screen, and charge the device at the same time. You can also control your phone or tablet from the projector's remote, although figuring out how to do this may take a call to BenQ. The instructions that show onscreen when you connect to an MHL device are misleading.

Also note that the port is HDMI 1.4a, which means that you can connect to a Blu-ray player or other video source for 3D. However, you'll need to buy 144Hz DLP-Link glasses separately. Older 120Hz glasses will also work for games, but not Blu-ray video.

Image Quality and Audio

The MX600 delivered near excellent data image quality on my tests, handing our standard suite of DisplayMate images with ease. Color balance was a little off in the two brightest preset modes, with some shades of gray a touch yellow compared with others, but not enough for most people to notice, much less consider it a problem.

Colors in most modes were fully saturated, although yellow was a little dark in most in terms of a hue saturation brightness color model, and all colors were a little dark in the brightest mode. More important for most data image, the projector handled fine detail well, with both black text on white and white text on black crisp and highly readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points.

Video quality is easily watchable for long sessions. It's necessarily limited by the native 1,024-by-768 resolution, but is good for the resolution. I saw the slightest hint of posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually) in one clip that tends to bring out that problem, but no other issues worth mention. Very much in the plus column is that the projector doesn't show as many rainbow artifacts (in the form of red-green-blue flashes) as many DLP projectors. I saw few enough that it's unlikely anyone in your audience would find them bothersome.

The audio also counts as a plus, with the 10-watt mono speaker offering acceptable sound quality and enough volume to fill a small to mid-size room. If you want stereo, higher quality, or more volume, you can plug an external sound system into the stereo audio output.

Although the BenQ MX600 doesn't offer quite enough to replace the Epson 93+ as Editors' Choice, it offers enough to put it in the running. It's portable and bright, it delivers both high quality data images and surprisingly good video, and it offers some features that the 93+ lacks, notably MHL support and 3D. Even if you don't need either feature right now, having them helps future-proof your investment. And if you need either or both, that may be enough to make the BenQ MX600 your XGA projector of choice.

Final Thoughts

The BenQ MX600 projector offers a 3,200-lumen rating, XGA (1024 by 768) resolution, and a claimed 10,000 hour lamp life. - BenQ MX600

BenQ MX600

4.0 Excellent

The BenQ MX600 projector is light enough to carry easily, at 5.1 pounds, and delivers both a bright, high-quality data image and surprisingly good video, along with 3D and MHL support.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio