PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson PowerLite 93+

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson PowerLite 93+ - PowerLite 93+ LCD Projector - HDTV - 4:3 (F/1.58 - 1.72 - SECAM, NTSC, PAL - 1024 x 768 - XGA - 2,000:1 - 2600 lm - HDMI
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Epson PowerLite 93+ is a touch less bright than many small projectors today, but it's light weight, low cost, and offers good to excellent image quality.

Pros & Cons

    • Light.
    • Low price.
    • High quality data image.
    • High quality video for a data projector.
    • Good audio quality and volume.
    • Relatively low brightness by today's standards.
    • No carrying case included.

PowerLite 93+ LCD Projector - HDTV - 4:3 (F/1.58 - 1.72 - SECAM, NTSC, PAL - 1024 x 768 - XGA - 2,000:1 - 2600 lm - HDMI Specs

Aspect Ratio: 4:3
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 10.3 inches
Engine Type: LCD
Height: 3.7 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1024 x 768
Rated Brightness: 2600 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 2000:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: Yes
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480i
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Business
USB Ports: 1
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Video Interfaces: S-Video
Warranty Labor: 24 months
Warranty Parts: 24 months
Weight: 6.9 lb
Width: 13.6 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Optical

Whether you're looking for an inexpensive XGA (1,024 by 768) projector, a lightweight model to use as a regular traveling companion, or both, the 6.9-pound, Epson PowerLite 93+ ($549 direct) should be on your short list. Although its 2,600 lumen rating is a little low by today's standards, it's as bright as most earlier-generation projectors in its class. More important, it's easily bright enough for the small to mid-size conference room its meant for, and bright enough to be Editors' Choice.

It's not hard to find competing projectors, like the 3,000 lumen NEC Display Solutions NP-V300X ($779 direct, 3.5 stars) that offer higher brightness ratings, but they come with higher price tags as well. In addition, many of them, including the NP-V300X  and the still more expensive Editors' Choice Optoma TW610ST ($1,000, 4 stars) are built around a single DLP chip, which means they suffer to a greater or lesser extent from a rainbow effect—the tendency for light areas surrounded by dark areas on screen to break up into little red-green-blue rainbows.

These rainbow artifacts grow out of the way single-chip DLP projectors create color. Some people are more sensitive to the effect than others, and some DLP projectors show it more easily than others, but it's always a potential concern. A three-panel LCD projector like the 93+, in contrast, eliminates any possibility of the rainbow effect. That's an important plus if you're concerned that some people in your audience may find rainbow artifacts annoying.

loading...

The Basics

The 93+ is a little large for its weight, at 3.7 by 13.6 by 10.3 inches (HWD)—or 4.2 inches high if you include the feet. However, it's small and light enough, at 6.9 pounds, to carry without much effort. It doesn't come with a carrying case, though, so be sure to add the cost of one to the price if you compare it to other models that include one.

Setup is standard. Simply plug in the appropriate cables, adjust the 1.2x zoom, and focus the image. The connectors for image sources include an HDMI port for a computer or video source, two VGA ports for computers or component video, and a composite video and S-Video port. In addition, you can connect to the USB port to either send an image from the computer or control the computer mouse from your remote, although you can't do both at once.

Image Quality and Other Issues

Image quality for both data and video is among the projector's strongest points. The 93+ sailed through are suite of DisplayMate tests without any serious problems. Colors were vibrant and fully saturated and color balance was excellent, with all levels of gray from black to white suitably neutral in all but one of the color presets. Impressively, I saw no pixel jitter with an analog connection on screens designed to bring out jitter. Also very much worth mention is that both black on white and white on black text were crisp and highly readable down to the smallest sizes we test with.

Video image quality was well short of what you'd want from a home theater projector, but excellent for a data projector. I saw a touch of posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually) and a moderate loss of shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas), but only on test clips that are particularly hard to handle well. Most data projectors do far worse. And neither problem showed up on more typical scenes.

The built-in audio, with a 16-watt mono speaker, is still another plus. The speakers in most data projectors in this weight class are hardly worth having. The 93+ speaker is loud enough to fill a small to mid-size conference room or classroom, and high enough quality to make out every word of a low volume monologue in a particularly challenging clip in our test suite. Unlike most projectors in this weight class, even if you need good sound quality, you can very easily get by without needing an external sound system.

The Epson PowerLite 93+  offers a more than attractive combination of brightness, portability, data image quality, video image quality, audio quality, and price. Its relatively low brightness by today's standards is a small strike against it, but more important is that the projector is bright enough for its intended use. The overall balance of features is easily enough to make the Epson PowerLite 93+ the budget-priced Editors' Choice for an XGA portable projector. 

More Projector Reviews:

•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

Epson PowerLite 93+ - PowerLite 93+ LCD Projector - HDTV - 4:3 (F/1.58 - 1.72 - SECAM, NTSC, PAL - 1024 x 768 - XGA - 2,000:1 - 2600 lm - HDMI

Epson PowerLite 93+

4.0 Excellent

The Epson PowerLite 93+ is a touch less bright than many small projectors today, but it's light weight, low cost, and offers good to excellent image quality.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio