PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector - Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector is light enough to be portable and bright enough to throw a suitably large image for a mid-size room even with ambient light.
Best Deal£2082.95

Buy It Now

£2082.95

Pros & Cons

    • Bright.
    • Reasonably portable.
    • 1.6x zoom lens.
    • Near excellent data image quality.
    • Above-par video quality.
    • Color balance issues in Theater mode and in brightest mode.
    • Noticeably loud fan noise in non-Eco lamp mode.

Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector Specs

Engine Type LCD
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 3500
Warranty 24
Weight 7.4

Similar in many ways to the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite 1880 MultiMedia Projector, the Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector($1,365.61 at Amazon) is a little less bright and a little less expensive. Rated at 3,500 lumens, it's a better fit than the 1880 for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom where the 1880's 4,000 lumens would be overkill. Beyond that, however, it offers many of the same strengths, including high-quality data images and above-par video for a data projector. That's enough to also make it an Editors' Choice for data projectors.

Like the Epson 1880, and as the name clearly says, the 1835 is built around an LCD-based, XGA (1,024-by-768) engine. It's also the same weight as the Epson 1880, at 7.4 pounds. That puts it in a weight class that's most likely to wind up permanently installed or on a cart for moving from room to room, but is also light enough to use as a portable. A lot of projectors with similar weights, including, for example, the DLP-based Optoma TW762, even come with soft carrying cases. Epson doesn't provide one for the 1835, however, so if you want one, you'll have to buy it separately.

Connections, Setup, and Brightness

Setting up the 1835 is standard fare, with a manual focus and manual 1.6x zoom. The back panel offers a typical assortment of connectors, including an HDMI 1.3 port; the usual VGA, S-Video, and composite video inputs; a USB Type A connector, which lets you show JPEG, BMP, PNG, and GIF files from a USB memory key; and a USB Type B connector, which you can set to either let you send data images over a USB connection or control your PC's mouse pointer from the projector's remote. In addition, you can add a Wi-Fi dongle ($99 direct).

For my tests, I used a 78-inch wide (98-inch diagonal) image, which was easily bright enough to stand up to typical levels of ambient light in a conference room or classroom. As one point of reference, using recommendations developed by SMPTE (The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers), 3,500 lumens would be bright enough for a 275-inch diagonal image in theater-dark lighting.

Data and Video Image Quality

Data image quality for the 1835 is near-excellent. On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, colors were bright, eye-catching, and vibrant in all color presets, and color balance was good, with suitably neutral grays at all levels with most presets. The only exceptions were Theater mode, which showed a slight greenish tint at some gray levels and a reddish tint at others, and the brightest mode, which was a bit yellowish-green in its brightest levels. However, it's common for projectors to have color balance problems in their brightest modes, and if you're bothered by this issue in one mode, you can simply switch to a mode that doesn't have the problem.

More important for most data applications is that the 1835 maintains detail well. Text at small sizes is not the crispest I've ever seen but both black text on white and white text on black qualify as crisp, clean, and easily readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points. Also very much on the plus side is that with an analog connection, the image was rock solid with only a hint of moire patterns even on screens that tend to bring out both pixel jitter and moire. If the slight moire patterns are an issue for your needs, you can use a digital connection to get rid of them.

Video quality in my tests was good enough for sitting through a full-length movie, which makes the 1835's video above par for a data projector. It's not even close to what you'd expect from a home theater projector, but it's eminently watchable.

The 1835 did a good job with skin tones and shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas), and I didn't see any motion artifacts or posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually), even in scenes that tend to cause those problems. Also worth mention is that because it's an LCD projector, the 1835 can't show the rainbow artifacts that DLP projectors can show (because of the way they produce color), and which some people find annoying.

One potential problem the 1835 shares with the Epson 1880 is fan noise. I'm not usually sensitive to fan noise, but the 1835's fan, with its 37 dB rating in Standard lamp mode, was loud enough for even me to notice when I was sitting within two or three feet of the projector. In Eco mode, it drops to a far quieter 29 dB, which is a lot easier to ignore. But if you tend to find fan noise bothersome, you may well consider this a problem if you're sitting near the projector and using it in Standard mode.

Also worth mention is that the sound system, with its 16-watt mono speaker, is easily loud enough for a large conference room or even a small auditorium. However, the sound quality leaves a lot to be desired, with a bottom-of-the barrel echo effect. It's good enough for spoken words in most situations, but if you need good sound quality, plan on using an external sound system.

Whatever the Epson PowerLite 1835's XGA 3LCD Projector shortcomings for sound, it does an excellent job for a data projector overall. It's bright, it's easy to set up thanks to the 1.6x zoom lens plus a suitable variety of connectors, it offers near-excellent data image quality plus above par video quality, and it includes a useable, if not particularly impressive, sound system. All of this adds up to making the Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector an impressive little brother to the PowerLite 1880 and an easy pick for Editors' Choice for data projectors for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom.

More Projector Reviews:

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector - Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector

Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector Review

4.0 Excellent

The Epson PowerLite 1835 XGA 3LCD Projector is light enough to be portable and bright enough to throw a suitably large image for a mid-size room even with ambient light.

Get It Now
Best Deal£2082.95

Buy It Now

£2082.95

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio