PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Optoma TW762

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Optoma TW762 - Optoma TW762
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

Rated at a bright 4,000 lumens, the 6.5-pound Optoma TW762 business projector manages to be both bright enough for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom and portable enough to carry.

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 4,000 lumen rating, yet light and portable.
    • HDMI port.
    • 3D-ready.
    • 1.2x zoom lens.
    • Although data image quality is certainly acceptable, it's a touch below top tier.

Optoma TW762 Specs

Aspect Ratio: 16:10
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 9.2 inches
Engine Type: DLP
Height: 3.8 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness: 4000 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 3000:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: Yes
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 575i/p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Business
Video Inputs: Component
Video Inputs: Composite
Video Inputs: HDMI
Video Inputs: S-Video
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Video Interfaces: S-Video
Warranty Labor: 36 months
Warranty Parts: 36 months
Weight: 6.4 lb
Width: 12.8 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Optical

If it weren't for its 4,000-lumen brightness rating, the Optoma TW762 ($1,100 street) would be a fairly typical lightweight projector. Built around a DLP-based WXGA (1,280 by 800) engine, it weighs in at 6.4 pounds. On the other hand, the 4,000 lumens pegs it as being suitable for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom, and bright enough to leave the lights on. That makes it notably bright for a projector that you can easily carry with you, and of obvious interest to anyone who can make use of the bright image, whether they need the portability or not.

As I pointed out in my review of the Editors' Choice WXGA Optoma TW610ST ($1,000 street, 4 stars), projectors in the TW762's weight class are generally less likely to wind up as constant traveling companions than they are to be permanently installed or put on a cart for room-to-room portability. However, Optoma includes a soft carrying case with the TW762, and the high brightness will give it special appeal for portable applications with a particular need for a bright projector. That's particularly true considering that the 4,000-lumen TW762 is a half pound lighter than the 3,000-lumen TW610ST.

Connections, Setup, and Brightness

Setting up the TW762 is absolutely standard, with a manual focus and manual 1.2x zoom. The back panel offers a reasonably full set of connectors, including an HDMI 1.3 port for a computer or video source, two VGA inputs for computers or component video, one pass-through monitor port, and both an S-Video and a composite video port.

In my tests, the TW762 was appropriately bright for its rating. The 78-inch wide (92-inch diagonal) image I tested with was easily bright enough to stand up to the ambient light in a typical office or classroom. The projector is well suited, in short, for throwing a reasonably large, bright image even with the lights on.

Data and Video Image Quality

The projector's data image quality is best described as acceptable, but a touch short of top tier. On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests the color balance was a little off, with supposedly neutral grays showing a distinctly greenish tinge in midtones. In addition, although most colors were suitably bright and vibrant, yellow was just a touch mustard-colored. On the other hand, both black text on a white background and white text on a black background were crisp and readable even at the smallest sizes we test with.

With video images, the TW762 handled skin tones well and did better than most data projectors with shadow detail (maintaining details based on shading in dark areas). I saw just a touch of posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually), but only in scenes that many projectors have problems with. On the minus side, however, I also saw unusually obvious noise in the image.

One other important problem was a more obvious than usual rainbow effect, with bright areas breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows. The effect is always a potential issue for any single-chip DLP projector, but some are more prone than others to showing it, and some people are more sensitive to seeing it. With the TW762 I saw the rainbows in both data and video screens much more often than with most DLP projectors. Anyone who is sensitive to the effect, as I am, may well find them annoying for either data or video sessions that last more than a few minutes.

Other Issues

The TW762's audio quality is better than average for its weight class. The 8-watt mono speaker is both loud enough to fill a small to mid-size conference room and high enough quality to be easily understandable.

Note too that the projector offers 3D support with DLP-Link glasses. As with all DLP-link projectors, there's some question about how practical this can be. The glasses sell for $70 or more each, and the 3D support is somewhat limited, so the projector won't work directly with a Blu-ray player, for example. However, I tested the 3D by connecting to a Blu-ray player through the Optoma 3D-XL ($400 street, 4 stars) external converter, and the 3D certainly works.

I'd be a lot happier with the Optoma TW762 if its data image quality were a touch better and if it weren't so prone to showing the rainbow effect. As it is, the best argument for considering it is because you need both brightness and portability. With most projectors in its weight class or below, including the TW610ST and the Casio Green Slim XJ-A250 ($1399.99 direct, 4 stars), rated in the range of 3,000 lumens or less, it's unquestionably a bright choice. Whether it's a smart choice too depends on how bright a projector you need and whether you're willing to trade a little image quality for a little more brightness.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

Optoma TW762 - Optoma TW762

Optoma TW762

3.0 Average

Rated at a bright 4,000 lumens, the 6.5-pound Optoma TW762 business projector manages to be both bright enough for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom and portable enough to carry.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio