PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Tech Giants: IoT Security Is Terrible, Here's How to Fix It

A report calls for future Internet of Things devices to have stronger encryption and allow less Internet access by default.

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Google, T-Mobile, Cisco and several other companies offered a plan this week to help boost the security of baby monitors, Wi-Fi routers, traffic lights, and the millions of other devices that make up Internet of Things (IoT).

SecurityWatchThe plan, published on Tuesday by the Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group, argues for a major shift in the way device manufacturers approach security. They should be "restrictive instead of permissive," meaning instead of automatically allowing Internet traffic, in some cases without a password or firewall, IoT devices of the future should be inaccessible to inbound connections by default.

Only after a user configures the device's security options would it be able to send and receive Internet traffic. For connected home devices like thermostats and baby monitors, that setup would have the additional benefit of not relying on the protection of a single firewall located in the home's Wi-Fi router.

The advisory group, formed in 2010, counts several major cellular and cable providers among its members, in addition to device manufacturers and content companies like Disney. Besides arguing for more default security, its report also suggests strong encryption and automated software updates, two measures that security experts have been calling for in the wake of a massive DDoS attack that crippled much of the Internet's infrastructure last month.

The inevitability of software bugs makes it critical for the IoT industry to "design their devices and systems based on the assumption that new bugs and vulnerabilities will be discovered over time," the report suggests.

It's a similar argument to one offered by ARM, the company that makes many of the chips that power IoT devices. The company's CEO Simon Segars expressed concern last month over the lax security of many of the devices its customers build.

"The security is non-existent," he said. "I mean, scarily bad. You can see the Wi-Fi password going by in clear text. Lots of people are building products like that."

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio