PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

These Lawmakers Want to Ban Online Porn and the VPNs You Use to Watch It

The Anticorruption of Public Morals Act outlines, in graphic detail, the type of sexual acts it doesn't want you watching. Its sponsor also wants porn distributors added to sex offender registries.

 & Emily Forlini Senior Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Credit: Isabel Pavia/Getty Images)

Don't miss out on our latest stories. Add PCMag as a preferred source on Google


Michigan Republicans have introduced sweeping legislation to ban sexual internet content, including standard porn, ASMR, AI-generated manga, and everything in between.

It would also ban using VPNs and other software and hardware tools, including proxy servers and encrypted tunneling networks, to circumvent the restrictions.

The primary sponsor of the Anticorruption of Public Morals Act is 33-year-old state Rep. Josh Schriver, who calls himself "Michigan's most conservative state representative."

"The intent of my bill is simple: Internet Service Providers block porn sites. Boom. Done. That’s it. They could do this in like 10 minutes if they wanted to," Schriver says.

(Credit: Josh Schriver/X)

He's also pushing to add porn distributors to the sex offender registry. "These measures defend children, safeguard our communities, and put families first," he tweeted last week.

The bill itself is a doozy to read. It details, in graphic detail, exactly the type of sexual acts it does not want circulating on the internet. For starters, the bill defines porn as any material whose "primary purpose...is to sexually arouse or gratify, including videos, erotica, magazines, stories, manga, material generated by artificial intelligence, live feeds, or sound clips."

Buckle up for this next part. The bill goes on to clarify that this includes anything showing "vaginal or anal intercourse, fellatio or cunnilingus, masturbation, ejaculation or orgasm, penetration with sexual devices, group sex, bondage, domination, or sadomasochism, acts involving bodily fluids, erotic ASMR, animated sexual activity generated by artificial intelligence," and more. (Seems like the lawmakers who wrote the bill might know a thing or two about this type of content.)

Another clause is raising alarm bells among civil rights and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups. The bill prohibits the depiction of transgender people, or individuals of "one biological sex imitating, depicting, or representing himself or herself to be the other biological sex." (Sorry, Shakespeare.)

The penalties for a person or website that posts this type of content range from up to 20 years in prison to $500,000 in fines. The bill demands that websites and social media services update their terms of service to prohibit that content in Michigan. That could mean sites like Pornhub or OnlyFans couldn't operate in the state, and possibly AI chatbots like Elon Musk's Grok, which now has a sexual anime companion and "spicy" image generator.

Co-sponsors of the Michigan bill include Matt Maddock, James DeSana, Joseph Fox, and Jennifer Wortz. It remains to be seen how much traction the bill will get. In the Michigan House, the GOP has a slight 58-52 edge. In the Senate, Democrats have a one-seat advantage, with one seat currently open.

Pornhub's parent company, Aylo, is currently blocking its sites in 17 states over age-verification laws that it says are a privacy nightmare that puts people's personal data at risk. The Supreme Court, however, recently upheld Texas's age-verification law, so Aylo is considering its options. In the meantime, people are getting around these bans by using VPNs. So, a blanket ban on the technology could mean fewer choices for web users, unrelated to sexual content.

The pornography issue, meanwhile, was addressed by the Supreme Court in 1973, with Justice Potter Stewart famously stating of obscenity: "I know it when I see it." The challenge was to define when sexual content veered into obscenity, and therefore illegal, territory. Ultimately, the justices developed a three-pronged test to determine if content could get someone in legal trouble, with Chief Justice Warren Burger acknowledging "the inherent dangers of undertaking to regulate any form of expression."

About Our Expert

Emily Forlini

Emily Forlini

Senior Reporter

My Experience

As a news and features writer at PCMag, I cover the biggest tech trends that shape the way we live and work. I specialize in on-the-ground reporting, uncovering stories from the people who are at the center of change—whether that’s the CEO of a high-valued startup or an everyday person taking on Big Tech. I also cover daily tech news and breaking stories, contextualizing them so you get the full picture.

I came to journalism from a previous career working in Big Tech on the West Coast. That experience gave me an up-close view of how software works and how business strategies shift over time. Now that I have my master's in journalism from Northwestern University, I couple my insider knowledge and reporting chops to help answer the big question: Where is this all going?

My Expertise

I'm the expert at PCMag for on-the-ground feature reporting and trending tech news, with a particular focus on electric vehicles and AI. I've published hundreds of articles and am also a podcast host, a bi-weekly tech correspondent for CBS News, a panel speaker and moderator, and a frequent contributor to a range of news and radio channels around the country.

The Technology I Use

All the latest from Apple and Microsoft, but I'll never give up my wired headphones! 

Read full bio