PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

SpamCatcher 4

 & Neil J. Rubenking Principal Writer, Security

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Security
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

SpamCatcher uses a variety of techniques to identify spam, but it substantially slows the downloading of mail in Outlook. It does an average job of separating spam from valid mail, but we'd be inclined to choose a product that does so without putting the brakes on Outlook.

Pros & Cons

    • Filters POP3, IMAP, Hotmail, AOL, or Exchange under Outlook.
    • Separate version works with any POP3 client.
    • Advanced whitelist/blacklist features.
    • Blocks messages that other users have marked as spam.
    • Slows downloading of e-mail very significantly (from under 4 minutes to over an hour in one test).
    • Accuracy is only average.

SpamCatcher 4 Specs

Type: Personal

Allume's SpamCatcher 4 filters out spam for any POP3, IMAP, Hotmail, AOL or Exchange e-mail account when integrated with Microsoft Outlook. A separate "universal" version integrates with Outlook Express. For any other POP3 e-mail client, the universal version provides program access through an icon in the system tray. We evaluated the Outlook version.

In addition to the usual analysis of message content, SpamCatcher employs several other techniques to identify spam. It checks each message's "fingerprint" against an online database to see if other users have flagged it as spam. It rejects messages sent from known spam broadcasters. It looks for "tricks" (attempts to fool antispam analysis), and casts a suspicious eye on messages sent to many recipients. And it specifically blocks phishing scams.

SpamCatcher also offers blacklist/whitelist support beyond the simple ability to block or approve an individual address or an entire domain. You can list all of your e-mail addresses, so the program's analysis will correctly identify messages addressed to you. It handles mailing lists separately, since these typically don't have your address in the "To" field. And you can optionally set it to block all e-mail that's not from an address on your whitelist. If you like, you can block all e-mail that's marked as coming from specific countries, or block mail based on various public blacklists. Finally, you can choose to protect certain senders, countries, or domains from blacklisting.

Alas, this multifaceted protection comes at a price: SpamCatcher is seriously slow. The initial download of 10,000 messages took overnight. In our timed test, SpamCatcher took over an hour to process the same set of messages that Outlook alone downloaded in 4 minutes. Allume verified that the process does slow downloading, and suggested that turning off Spam Network checking might improve speed—at the expense of accuracy. We opted for accuracy.

Despite this choice and despite our initial training, SpamCatcher's ability to distinguish valid mail from spam was only average. It let 13 percent of the spam messages into the in-box and blocked almost 4 percent of the valid messages. Just to check, we changed its spam threshold from Lenient (the default) to Aggressive and rescanned the in-box. This skewed things the other way—only 4 percent of spam got through, but 22 percent of valid mail was blocked. Of course, a well-managed whitelist and blacklist would improve overall accuracy.

SpamCatcher uses a variety of techniques to identify spam, but it slows the downloading of mail in Outlook substantially. Though it does an average job of separating spam from valid mail, we'd be inclined to choose a product that does so without putting the brakes on Outlook.

More antispam software reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Security

SpamCatcher 4

2.5 Fair

SpamCatcher uses a variety of techniques to identify spam, but it substantially slows the downloading of mail in Outlook. It does an average job of separating spam from valid mail, but we'd be inclined to choose a product that does so without putting the brakes on Outlook.

About Our Expert

Neil J. Rubenking

Neil J. Rubenking

Principal Writer, Security

My Experience

When the IBM PC was new, I served as the president of the San Francisco PC User Group for three years. That’s how I met PCMag’s editorial team, who brought me on board in 1986. In the years since that fateful meeting, I’ve become PCMag’s expert on security, privacy, and identity protection, putting antivirus tools, security suites, and all kinds of security software through their paces.

Before my current security gig, I supplied PCMag readers with tips and solutions on using popular applications, operating systems, and programming languages in my "User to User" and "Ask Neil" columns, which began in 1990 and ran for almost 20 years. Along the way, I wrote more than 40 utility articles, as well as Delphi Programming for Dummies and six other books covering DOS, Windows, and programming. I also reviewed thousands of products of all kinds, ranging from early Sierra Online adventure games to AOL’s precursor Q-Link.

In the early 2000s, I turned my focus to security and the growing antivirus industry. After years of working with antivirus, I’m known throughout the security industry as an expert on evaluating antivirus tools. I serve as an advisory board member for the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO), an international nonprofit group dedicated to coordinating and improving testing of anti-malware solutions.

The Technology I Use

Much of the testing I do, particularly testing with real-world ransomware, is just plain dangerous. To perform such tests safely, I sequester them inside virtual machines managed by VMWare Workstation. For cross-platform testing, I use a MacBook Air, a Google Pixel 4, and a 6th-generation iPad.

I rely on my Delphi coding skills to create and maintain small applications. These include programs to check whether an antivirus correctly handled the malware it detected, launch dangerous URLs and record the security program’s reaction, and analyze the malware that I collect for use in testing. I also wrote a tiny browser and text editor for use in testing security apps that have predefined reactions for known products.

I do my writing and research on a Dell OptiPlex desktop, relying on Microsoft Word (my fingers know all the shortcuts). Many of my articles include charts and analysis; Excel is my go-to for those. When work hours end, though, I escape the bounds of Microsoft and Windows. There’s an iPhone in my pocket, I relax with my oversized iPad, and my Kindle Oasis is always loaded with the best science fiction and fantasy.

Read full bio