PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Everything

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Everything can be highly useful as a lean desktop search utility that doesn't take up a lot of your PC's resources. - Everything
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

Everything can be highly useful as a lean desktop search utility that doesn't take up a lot of your PC's resources.

Pros & Cons

    • Fast.
    • Requires minimal computer resources.
    • Can choose search options from menus or type them in as part of the search phrase.
    • No full-text search.
    • Can't search for email messages.

Everything (free, with a $5 donation suggested) from voidtools is the sort of lean desktop search utility that virtually anyone will find useful. However, it will be particularly appealing if you find it quicker to type commands (like file:, path:, or case:) rather than look for them on menus. Despite being in the same broad category as, and sharing basic features with, desktop search utilities like Lookeen and X1 Search, which is our Editors' Choice, Everything (now in version 1.3.4) is a very different class of program. Where both Lookeen and X1 Search are robust business productivity tools, Everything is better thought of as a highly useful, but somewhat limited, utility.

Basics

All three programs create an index, so they don't have to search your entire drive or drives every time you search, and all three find results almost instantly, coming up with hits as you type the search into the search text box. They also all offer a window with a list of hits, which for Everything looks similar to Windows Explorer.

The default columns for Everything are Name, Path, Size, and Date Modified, but you can customize the choices, such as adding Extension and Type. As with Internet Explorer, you can move or copy files to the Desktop or to an Explorer window by dragging the file name from the Everything window. Similarly, right-clicking on the file name opens a context-sensitive menu that includes most of the same choices as the Explorer context-sensitive menu (including Open, Cut, Copy and Delete), plus some useful additions, most notably Copy Full Name to Clipboard (which copies the full path along with the file name).

There are two things that differentiate Everything from Lookeen and X1 Search. First, the other two programs index and search email, as well as documents. Second, they both index the full text of each item, so you can search for any text in the file or email. Everything limits the index and the search to file names and paths only.

There's a third important difference as well. The Everything utility is free. Although voidtools suggests a modest $5 donation, you don't have to pay anything. Simply download it from the voidtools website, and run the file to install it. It will then take a few moments to create its index, after which all of its features are immediately available.

Capabilities and Limitations

The ability to search for emails, as well as documents, makes Lookeen and X1 Search far more capable than Everything as general-purpose business tools. But even if you are only interested in finding documents, the lack of full-text search in Everything makes it a little harder to find what you're looking for.

After spending years reviewing printers, scanners, and other products, I have thousands of files on my drive with HP in the name. If I need to find a particular HP printer review or other document, searching for HP with Everything turns up over 10,000 hits. Entering the search as file:hp, to eliminate folder names, turns up well over 9,500 hits, and if I use Everything's built-in Document filter option to limit the search to documents, I still get more than 2,500.

If I want a shorter list to search through, I can add the model name as part of the search, but if I have the information I'm looking for in a file with a name like Notes, it won't show up with Everything. With Lookeen or X1 Search, as long as the model number is somewhere in the full text of the file, the file will show up in the results. And with full-text search I can also search for any other snippets of text I happen to remember as being in the file.

Even with this big a haystack to search through, however, Everything can still be highly useful. For some percentage of searches, it will find the right file in a shorter, more manageable, list of hits based strictly on having the model number in the file name. Or, since I keep files on the same subject together in the same folder, it may find another file in that folder. If so, I can take advantage of the command on the context-sensitive menu to go to the folder and then browse through the file names there.

This approach won't let you find the file you're looking for as quickly or as reliably as with a program that indexes the full text of each file. However, it will usually let you find it, even if it takes a bit more time and effort.

More Ways to Use Everything

There are also times when it's useful to find all the files of a given kind on your drive, so you can delete them, move them, or do some other housekeeping task. The Everything utility can handle this kind of search with ease.

As part of my writing process, for example, I create multiple image captures for each review. I keep each set in the same folder as the review itself, so the images are scattered over my drive in well over 100 separate folders for any given year.

It's helpful to delete some of these files every so often to free up the space on the drive. I could do that by navigating to each folder in turn. But that's daunting enough that I'd probably never do it. Everything solves the problem.

By default, the capture utility I use, CaptureWizPro, names each file CaptureWiz plus a number, and I rarely have a reason to change the name. To delete all the CaptureWiz images, I only have to search for file:CaptureWiz, click on the Date Modified column to sort by date, highlight the files in the date range I want to delete, and hit the Delete key. Thanks to the Everything utility, what would otherwise be a time-consuming chore takes me less than minute.

Conclusion

If you need a desktop search program that can search for email, as well as files, consider X1 Search or Lookeen. If searching for email is not an issue, and you can't justify the cost of a full-fledged desktop search tool, consider the free version of Lookeen, which lacks an email search capability but still offers full-text search for documents.

If you can do without full-text search, however, and particularly if you value a utility that doesn't use much of your computer resources—taking far less drive space for index files, for example, than Lookeen or X1 Search needs—check out Everything. Even though it can't search email or do a full-text search, it's fast, easy to use, and offers a powerful set of search options, all of which makes it impressively good at what it does.

Final Thoughts

Everything can be highly useful as a lean desktop search utility that doesn't take up a lot of your PC's resources. - Everything

Everything

3.0 Average

Everything can be highly useful as a lean desktop search utility that doesn't take up a lot of your PC's resources.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio