PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

AOL

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - AOL
2.0 Subpar

Pros & Cons

AOL Specs

Type: Personal

AOL ($23.90 per month) doesn't have a great reputation when it comes to spam, though it does try. The company keeps track of known spamming servers and blocks them, which it says eliminates about 20 percent of spam. You probably wouldn't know that by looking at the amount of spam in your account, though.

AOL marks all incoming mail as being either from People I Know, Bulk Senders, or Unknown Senders. If you consistently add to your address book bulk and unknown mailers from whom you want messages, you can effectively use the People I Know view as a spam-free view of mail. But you'll have to do a lot of training to get to the point where you no longer have to check your other views. To cut down further on junk mail, AOL's Mail Controls let us configure our mail to create various types of whitelists, such as only AOL users or only specified e-mail addresses.

New in Version 8.0, we could fink on a spammer to AOL with the Report Spam button on the message window. AOL gets almost 2 million spam referrals daily, which gives you an idea of how much spam gets through the systemwide filters. It uses the referrals to feed its own blacklist.

In the bigger picture, AOL argues that software can never be the whole solution to the problem, and the company lobbies for stronger laws to end some spamming techniques and hold spammers financially liable for misleading and dishonest tactics. Recently, the company was actually able to prosecute a spammer successfully, but we're less sanguine about trying to make a dent in spam through the nation's courtrooms.

Final Thoughts

 - AOL

AOL

2.0 Subpar

About Our Expert

Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer has been writing software for and English about computers ever since—much to his own amazement—he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1983.

He was one of the authors of NPL and NPL-R, fourth-generation languages for microcomputers by the now-defunct DeskTop Software Corporation. (Larry is sad to find absolutely no hits on any of these +products on Google.) His work at Desktop Software included programming the UCSD p-System, a virtual machine-based operating system with portable binaries that pre-dated Java by more than 10 years.

For several years, he wrote corporate software for Mathematica Policy Research (they're still in business!) and Chase Econometrics (not so lucky) before being forcibly thrown into the consulting market. He bummed around the Philadelphia consulting and contract-programming scenes for a year or two before taking a job at NSTL (National Software Testing Labs) developing product tests and managing contract testing for the computer industry, governments and publication.

In 1991 Larry moved to Massachusetts to become Technical Director of PC Week Labs (now eWeek Labs). He moved within Ziff Davis to New York in 1994 to run testing at Windows Sources. In 1995, he became Technical Director for Internet product testing at PC Magazine and stayed there till 1998.

Since then, he has been writing for numerous other publications, including Fortune Small Business, Windows 2000 Magazine (now Windows and .NET Magazine), ZDNet and Sam Whitmore's Media Survey.

He is co-author of Linksys Networks: The Official Guide, author of ADMIN911: Windows 2000 Terminal Services and Webmaster of ADMIN911 and CPA911.

Larry can be reached at larryseltzer@ziffdavis.com.

Check out Larry Seltzer's introductory column: Ziff Davis' Security Supersite: Blocking the Bad Guys

Read full bio