PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

PestPatrol 4.1

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - PestPatrol 4.1
1.0 Dismal

Pros & Cons

PestPatrol 4.1 Specs

Type: Personal

We had serious problems with PestPatrol, which crashed and refused to run on either test configuration after removing spyware and adware. PestPatrol Inc. had no explanation. Our results might reflect some idiosyncrasy in our test configurations, but they were disturbing nonetheless.

We actually used PestPatrol's command line version to test for spyware on our readers' machines, because PestPatrol let us automate scanning and disinfection.

PestPatrol searched for and found a large variety of what it calls pests, including cookies, spyware, Trojans, and key loggers, but it found only half of our target spyware. In addition, PestPatrol took action on only about 70 percent of the identified target pests, because the tested version can't directly disable the folders and Registry entries installed by some spyware (according to the company, Version 5 will be able to do this). All it can do is recommend deleting them.

Finally, after we rebooted, Norton AntiVirus's ccEmailProxy, a resident e-mail monitor, failed at start-up. The PestPatrol staff had no explanations and suggested we wait to test the next version, but our deadlines made this impossible.

We hope to reexamine PestPatrol in the future, but for now we can't recommend it.

Final Thoughts

 - PestPatrol 4.1

PestPatrol 4.1

1.0 Dismal

About Our Expert

Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer has been writing software for and English about computers ever since—much to his own amazement—he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1983.

He was one of the authors of NPL and NPL-R, fourth-generation languages for microcomputers by the now-defunct DeskTop Software Corporation. (Larry is sad to find absolutely no hits on any of these +products on Google.) His work at Desktop Software included programming the UCSD p-System, a virtual machine-based operating system with portable binaries that pre-dated Java by more than 10 years.

For several years, he wrote corporate software for Mathematica Policy Research (they're still in business!) and Chase Econometrics (not so lucky) before being forcibly thrown into the consulting market. He bummed around the Philadelphia consulting and contract-programming scenes for a year or two before taking a job at NSTL (National Software Testing Labs) developing product tests and managing contract testing for the computer industry, governments and publication.

In 1991 Larry moved to Massachusetts to become Technical Director of PC Week Labs (now eWeek Labs). He moved within Ziff Davis to New York in 1994 to run testing at Windows Sources. In 1995, he became Technical Director for Internet product testing at PC Magazine and stayed there till 1998.

Since then, he has been writing for numerous other publications, including Fortune Small Business, Windows 2000 Magazine (now Windows and .NET Magazine), ZDNet and Sam Whitmore's Media Survey.

He is co-author of Linksys Networks: The Official Guide, author of ADMIN911: Windows 2000 Terminal Services and Webmaster of ADMIN911 and CPA911.

Larry can be reached at larryseltzer@ziffdavis.com.

Check out Larry Seltzer's introductory column: Ziff Davis' Security Supersite: Blocking the Bad Guys

Read full bio