PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Clearview AI To Be Banned From Selling Facial Recognition Tech To Most Firms

However, the controversial startup can continue selling the database access to US law enforcement agencies, according to the settlement agreement.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Clearview AI, a startup that operates a massive facial recognition database, has agreed to a nationwide ban prohibiting it from selling access to the technology to most private companies and private individuals. 

The ban comes from a settlement Clearview AI reached with the American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups. Back in 2020, the organizations sued Clearview AI on allegations the company’s facial recognition database violated a privacy law in Illinois that bars private entities from collecting biometric data on users without their consent. 

Clearview AI’s own database — which is made up of 10 billion photos — was created by scrapping people’s images from news sites and social media profiles, without first asking for permission. In turn, the company has been selling access to the facial recognition database to law enforcement agencies as a way to help them identify suspected criminals and terrorists. 

On Monday, the ACLU announced the settlement, calling it a major win for privacy advocates. However, it’s important to note Clearview AI already agreed to stop selling database access to private companies back in 2020 after it began facing a wave of class action lawsuits from consumers. 

The settlement also allows Clearview AI to continue to sell database access to federal and state law enforcement agencies, although in Illinois the company has agreed to a five-year ban on selling the technology to state and local government entities.

The other exception is how Clearview AI can sell the database access to financial institutions, an area which isn’t covered by Illnois’s biometric privacy law. However, the company told The New York Times it had no plans to supply the database to any private companies outside government agencies for the time being.  

As a result, the settlement changes little for Clearview AI, which is also calling the agreement a win for the company. “Clearview AI will make no changes to its current business model,” one of the company’s lawyers wrote in a statement. “It will continue to expand its business offerings in compliance with applicable law.  And it will pay a small amount of money to cover advertising and fees, far less money than continued litigation would cost.”

In the same statement, the CEO of Clearview AI Hoan Ton-That also noted the settlement allows the company to sell its facial recognition algorithms to private companies, so long as the database of photos is not included. 

Still, the ACLU is hoping the settlement encourages the US to adopt more  regulations aimed at reining in the privacy risks from today’s facial recognition technologies. 

“Other companies would be wise to take note, and other states should follow Illinois’ lead in enacting strong biometric privacy laws,” said Nathan Freed Wessler, an ACLU deputy director. 

In Illinois, residents can also request Clearview AI pull their biometric information from appearing in the company’s facial recognition database by filling out a digital form and submitting a picture of themselves.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio