PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai - Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai film scanner offers high resolution, hardware-based dust and scratch removal, and simple color calibration for scans.
Best Deal£389.99

Buy It Now

£389.99
£495.99

Pros & Cons

    • Optical resolution rated at 7,200 pixels per inch.
    • Hardware-based dust and scratch removal.
    • Automatic color calibration.
    • Scans only one slide or frame of film at a time.
    • Little automation in software.

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai Specs

Automatic Document Feeder
Ethernet Interface
Film Scanning
Flatbed
Maximum Optical Resolution 7200 pixels
Maximum Scan Area 35mm
Mechanical Resolution 7200

The 8200 Ai ($499.99) is Plustek's top-of-the-line model for 35mm dedicated film and slide scanners. The next step up from the Plustek 8200i SE, it offers the same 7,200 pixel-per-inch (ppi) resolution and hardware-based dust and scratch removal, along with a less-robust, but faster, software-based alternative. In fact, the scanner itself is virtually identical to the Plustek 8200i SE. Where the two differ is in their scan utilities. The 8200i Ai comes with software that lets you color calibrate the scanner for images that are truer to the originals.

As with the Plustek 8200i SE, one of the 8200i Ai's obvious competitors is the Epson Perfection V700 Photo, which offers several advantages to go along with its higher price. Among the most obvious are the Epson V700's ability to scan up to 12 slides or 24 frames of film at once, scan transparencies (meaning slides or film) as large as 8 by 10 inches, and a selection of software that includes an option for fully automated scanning with surprisingly good results. The 8200i Ai offers at least two advantages over the Epson V700, with color calibration and 7,200 pixel-per-inch optical resolution, which can potentially provide more detail in scans than the 6,400ppi Epson V700, or the less expensive Editors' Choice Epson Perfection V550 Photo Scanner, also 6,400ppi. Color calibration can potentially give scans with the 8200i Ai better color fidelity.

Basics
A key difference between both Epson models and the 8200i Ai is that the Epson models are flatbeds, suitable for general-purpose scanning, while the 8200i Ai is a dedicated film scanner. Because they are flatbeds, the Epson models can scan photographic prints and documents, as well as transparencies. The 8200i AI is limited to 35mm transparencies.

Limiting scanning to 35mm slides and film helps keep the scanner size down, too. The 8200i Ai measures only 4.7 by 4.7 by 10.7 inches (HWD), so it won't take up much room on your desk. You can also use the padded case to store it away when you're not using it or to carry it to a different location.

For scan software, you get the same Plustek QuickScan utility as with the 8200i SE, but with LaserSoft Imaging SilverFast Ai 8.0, rather than SilverFast SE Plus.

SilverFast, which also comes with the Epson V700, is to scan utilities what Photoshop is to photo editing. It's one of the most capable choices for professional photographers and serious amateurs, but it's not particularly easy to use. SilverFast Ai is the high-end version, adding the automated color-calibration the SE Plus lacks. Also included with the scanner is a standard IT8 target slide, so you can take advantage of the calibration feature in the software.

Setup and Scanning
I tested the 8200i Ai on a Windows Vista system. Setup was standard, with little required beyond installing the software and plugging in the supplied USB cable and power cord. Typically, you would also calibrate the scanner as part of the initial setup.

To calibrate, you first go to the LaserSoft Web site to download the appropriate comparison file for the particular slide that comes with the scanner. You then choose the IT8 calibration icon in SilverFast, and scan the slide. The program will compare the colors in the scan to what they should be according to the comparison file and then create a calibration file to adjust for the differences.

The first step for scanning is to mount a strip of film with a maximum of six frames, or one to four slides, in the appropriate carrier, then insert the carrier into a slot on the side of the scanner. The carriers each click into place for each frame or slide, so you can easily line the original up correctly. After you finish each scan, you manually reposition the carrier for the next one.

To start the actual scan, you press either the QuickScan or IntelliScan button on the front of the scanner. With the QuickScan button, the software will, by default, scan and save to a file. With the IntelliScan button, SilverFast will open on your PC.

Unfortunately, neither utility offers the kind of sophisticated algorithm that will prescan, analyze the image, and then set assorted features to reliably give you a high-quality scan. You have to set everything manually, or you'll most likely wind up with a poor-quality image. QuickScan offers only a limited number of settings, so you're well advised to skip the QuickScan utility and use SilverFast instead.

Once you're familiar with SilverFast, you'll probably want to simply adjust settings as needed. Until you learn the program well enough for that, you can use the Workflow Pilot feature in Silverlight to walk through the process step by step. Depending on which Workflow you choose, however, the program may leave out some steps you need to get a good scan. If you're new to SilverFast, plan on investing some time learning how to use it before you scan many images.

Speed and Scan Quality
Given that Plustek rates the 8200i Ai at the same speed as the Plustek 8200i SE, it's not surprising that it delivered similar overall speeds in testing. However, there was some variation between them, most likely because of minor differences in scan settings and related processing time for the computer. With the 8200i Ai, I timed prescanning a single slide or frame of film at a consistent 18 to 19 seconds, and actual scans ranged from 33 seconds at 1,800ppi to 6 minutes 49 seconds at 7,200ppi.

If you take advantage of the SilverFast Multi-Exposure feature, the scans take significantly longer. Multi-Exposure takes two scans using different exposure times and then integrates the information into one image. The result is an increase in the scanner's effective dynamic range (the ability to distinguish detail based on shading) particularly in dark areas of the image. With the 8200i Ai, I timed a scan at 7,200ppi with Multi-Exposure at 14 minutes 17 seconds.

Overall scan quality was also similar between the 8200i Ai and the 8200i SE. For both models, the scans showed appropriate detail for the resolution and also maintained detail based on shading in both dark and light areas of the image. On one of our standard test images, with a bride being walked down the aisle, the 8200i Ai handled skin tones well, and showed both the white-on-white detail in the bridal gown and the two levels of black in the tuxedo. As with the Plustek 8200i SE, however, to get that level of quality, I first had to get familiar with the settings choices in SilverFast.

Benefits of Color Calibration
Because the color-calibration feature is the primary difference between the 8200i Ai and the 8200i SE, and the only reason to spend extra to get the Ai version, I made a point of scanning several slides and negatives before and after calibration.

Note that the color calibration is primarily meant for slides and other positive film images, rather than negatives. And, indeed, most of the scanned negatives showed little to no difference between the versions scanned before and after calibration. In contrast, all of the slide scans showed obvious differences in color after calibration, with significantly better color quality in every case.

When I tested the Plustek 8200i SE, I wished it shipped with software that would deliver good scans with little to no effort, like the point-and-shoot modes in most cameras. The same comment applies here, although I'm more inclined to forgive the oversight with the 8200i Ai, since it's clearly aimed at the kind of professional or serious amateur who's willing to learn a complex program to get the best possible scan.

If all you want is easy automated scanning, you'll be better off with a scanner like the Epson Perfection V550. And even if you want the full capability of SilverFast, but with the option to use an easier approach at least some of the time, you should look at the Epson V700. Also keep in mind that if you need to scan at larger than 35mm film size, the V700 can go all the way to 8 by 10 inches.

If 35mm film and slide scanning is all you need, however, and you're willing to spend the time learning SilverFast and using it on every scan, the Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai could be a good choice. More than that, between its 7,200ppi resolution, its hardware-based dust and scratch removal, and particularly its color calibration, it may be the best choice.

Final Thoughts

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai - Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai

Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai

3.5 Good

The Plustek OpticFilm 8200i Ai film scanner offers high resolution, hardware-based dust and scratch removal, and simple color calibration for scans.

Get It Now
Best Deal£389.99

Buy It Now

£389.99
£495.99

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio