PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple: Parental Control Apps Were Pulled for Security Reasons

Last year, Apple removed and restricted at least 11 popular screen-time and parental control apps from third-party developers. Apple says they're a security risk; the devs think Apple wants people using its own Screen Time service.

 & Michael Kan Principal Reporter

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Apple's attempts to help parents fight smartphone addiction among children should've been a PR win. But a group of third-party developers says Cupertino has been unfairly cracking down on their parental control apps in favor of its own products. Apple claims the takedowns are for security purposes.

Last year, Apple added a parental control system, called Screen Time, to iOS 12. But it also removed and restricted at least 11 popular screen-time and parental control apps from third-party developers, The New York Times reports.

As a result, some app makers have had no choice but to shut down. "They yanked us out of the blue with no warning," the head of OurPact, a parental control iPhone app, told the Times. "They are systematically killing the industry."

OurPact

In a Sunday statement, Apple claimed the crackdown had nothing to do with stifling competition. "We recently removed several parental control apps from the App Store, and we did it for a simple reason: they put users' privacy and security at risk," the company claimed.

According to Apple, the third-party apps in question used a "highly invasive technology," called Mobile Device Management. "MDM gives a third party control and access over a device and its most sensitive information including user location, app use, email accounts, camera permissions and browsing history," the company said.

Although MDM does have legitimate uses, especially among enterprises, Apple has banned its use in consumer-facing apps available on the official App Store. "Parents shouldn't have to trade their fears of their children's device usage for risks to privacy and security, and the App Store should not be a platform to force this choice. No one, except you, should have unrestricted access to manage your child's device," the company added.

Apple didn't provide hard evidence of the MDM usage, but it says affected third-party developers were given 30 days to change their apps. Those that did not were pulled from the App Store.

The developers cited in Times' report dispute Apple's take on the crackdown. They claim Apple's Screen Time feature system is a watered-down parental control app children can quickly learn to circumvent. And they accuse Apple of denying consumers a choice over how families monitor and control device usage.

According to the Times, two popular parental-control apps, Kidslox and Qustodio, have filed complaints with the European Union's competition office over Apple's crackdown.

About Our Expert

Michael Kan

Michael Kan

Principal Reporter

My Experience

I've been a journalist for over 15 years. I got my start as a schools and cities reporter in Kansas City and joined PCMag in 2017, where I cover satellite internet services, cybersecurity, PC hardware, and more. I'm currently based in San Francisco, but previously spent over five years in China, covering the country's technology sector.

Since 2020, I've covered the launch and explosive growth of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service, writing 600+ stories on availability and feature launches, but also the regulatory battles over the expansion of satellite constellations, fights with rival providers like AST SpaceMobile and Amazon, and the effort to expand into satellite-based mobile service. I've combed through FCC filings for the latest news and driven to remote corners of California to test Starlink's cellular service.

I also cover cyber threats, from ransomware gangs to the emergence of AI-based malware. In 2024 and 2025, the FTC forced Avast to pay consumers $16.5 million for secretly harvesting and selling their personal information to third-party clients, as revealed in my joint investigation with Motherboard.

I also cover the PC graphics card market. Pandemic-era shortages led me to camp out in front of a Best Buy to get an RTX 3000. I'm now following how the AI-driven memory shortage is impacting the entire consumer electronics market. I'm always eager to learn more, so please jump in the comments with feedback and send me tips.

The Best Tech I've Had:

  • My first video game console: a Nintendo Famicom
  • I loved my Sega Saturn despite PlayStation's popularity.
  • The iPod Video I received as a gift in college
  • Xbox 360 FTW
  • The Galaxy Nexus was the first smartphone I was proud to own.
  • The PC desktop I built in 2013, which still works to this day.

Read full bio